12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
20-08-2014, 07:38 PM
RE: 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
(20-08-2014 07:35 PM)diddo97 Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 08:30 PM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  Well seeing as america is complaining about its education but has a 40% creationist population, while a country like japan has a low creationist count but a good education seems to show why this argument stands.

Japan is highly religious. Their religions are just not nearly as assertive as Christianity.

This is not true, seeing as 65% do not have a religion at all.

http://www.infobarrel.com/25_Most_Atheis..._the_World

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2014, 07:44 PM
RE: 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
(20-08-2014 07:38 PM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  
(20-08-2014 07:35 PM)diddo97 Wrote:  Japan is highly religious. Their religions are just not nearly as assertive as Christianity.

This is not true, seeing as 65% do not have a religion at all.

http://www.infobarrel.com/25_Most_Atheis..._the_World

Some of their religions are atheistic.

Truth seeker.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2014, 08:39 PM
RE: 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
(20-08-2014 07:44 PM)diddo97 Wrote:  
(20-08-2014 07:38 PM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  This is not true, seeing as 65% do not have a religion at all.

http://www.infobarrel.com/25_Most_Atheis..._the_World

Some of their religions are atheistic.

No they are talking about atheist with no religion, and that is being fair and not including the people who are atheist by definition but don't say they are one. Japan is a very secular country, a lot in fact. Even then with religion, they are still a science accepting country. If they were not I would not have my eyes set on it.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
21-08-2014, 08:54 PM
RE: 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
I love this one:

"Argument 4 Doubting evolution is like doubting gravity
Why does this argument fail? We’ll show you. Take a pencil or pen. Hold it in the air. Then drop it to the floor. That’s gravity. Next, make a single-celled organism—like an amoeba—turn into a goat. Go ahead. We’ll wait. . . . No? As you can see, there’s a fundamental difference between operational science, which can be tested through repeatable experimentation, and historical science, which cannot."

Not only is this argument idiotic because they don't have a clue what evolution is, but their claims are so idiotic that we could easily say to them: "Go ahead and build a giant boat and put two of every animal on it for 314 days. We'll wait...No? As you can see, ridiculous fairy tales of magic are not reliable.

“Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.” - Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
21-08-2014, 11:16 PM
RE: 12 arguments evolutionists should avoid, according to AIG
(21-08-2014 08:54 PM)WindyCityJazz Wrote:  I love this one:

"Argument 4 Doubting evolution is like doubting gravity
Why does this argument fail? We’ll show you. Take a pencil or pen. Hold it in the air. Then drop it to the floor. That’s gravity. Next, make a single-celled organism—like an amoeba—turn into a goat. Go ahead. We’ll wait. . . . No? As you can see, there’s a fundamental difference between operational science, which can be tested through repeatable experimentation, and historical science, which cannot."

Not only is this argument idiotic because they don't have a clue what evolution is, but their claims are so idiotic that we could easily say to them: "Go ahead and build a giant boat and put two of every animal on it for 314 days. We'll wait...No? As you can see, ridiculous fairy tales of magic are not reliable.

There is no such thing as historical science.

For our creation friends who might be here on this site.
Historical science is a term coined only by creationists and you are using it as a strawman and just shows your ignorance.

If I murder someone, how would you know it if you were not there?

Blood?
Finger Prints?
A Motive?
My name written in blood by my victim?
My foot prints?
My Hair I left behind as it was torn off my head when the victim tried to protect themselves?
The murder weapon with the victims blood on it and my finger prints with a registration papers that says its registered to me?

Now pretend that Instead of me saying the world murder, I said evolution and instead of the words above. Replace them with
Fossil Record?
DNA Research?
Mapped Human Genome?

and so on.

Show me the metal given to your scientists that proved 95% of all science on the planet wrong that was given to them personally by stephen hawking, michio kaku and bill nye personally and I will accept intelligent design. Until than, fuck off.


My Youtube channel if anyone is interested.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEkRdbq...rLEz-0jEHQ
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: