3 questions for atheists
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 8 Votes - 1.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-01-2014, 02:31 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:26 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:18 PM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  Obviously, since you have been trolling this same stupid "I don't get it" bullshit for so many pages.



If you wish to be taken seriously.


Your sorry punk ass doesn't speak for me and what I would prefer.

Love it. Can you even provide evidence why you expect evidence to be presented?

You would happily accept any claim at all without backing evidence -- the moon is made of cheese, there are fairies and leprechauns and pink dragons and unicorns, etc. This is what you are undeniably arguing for when you claim there is no need to back a given claim with evidence. You can have that for yourself if you want it, but it's fucking stupid.


We know better.


Quote:Oh no, you don't expect it you just need it for it believe it. Laughat

You don't speak for me and what I expect, you pathetic shitstain.







(19-01-2014 02:30 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Your position is infantile, you speak "but why, but why, but why". Some kids come out of that stage around 3 or 4, some don't and believe it holds a deep philosophy to espouse with great fervour on internet forums.

OH, look, it's talking to itself again. HoboLaughat

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 02:34 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:09 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 01:51 PM)Chas Wrote:  How many times and ways telling you why does it take? Apparently you will never understand, so why don't you just piss off.

Perhaps you can outline how you would ever accept the claim of it being unknowable?
Or you can dodge and play with your puthssy.

C'mon Chas I need one of your emphatic one liners to make me understand how you would accept this claim.

You can do it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 02:38 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:31 PM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:26 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Love it. Can you even provide evidence why you expect evidence to be presented?

You would happily accept any claim at all without backing evidence -- the moon is made of cheese, there are fairies and leprechauns and pink dragons and unicorns, etc. This is what you are undeniably arguing for when you claim there is no need to back a given claim with evidence. You can have that for yourself if you want it, but it's fucking stupid.


We know better.


Quote:Oh no, you don't expect it you just need it for it believe it. Laughat

You don't speak for me and what I expect, you pathetic shitstain.







(19-01-2014 02:30 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Your position is infantile, you speak "but why, but why, but why". Some kids come out of that stage around 3 or 4, some don't and believe it holds a deep philosophy to espouse with great fervour on internet forums.

OH, look, it's talking to itself again. HoboLaughat

I love how you use the fairies, moon is made of cheese type argument as if they provide anything of value.

The irony is many atheists promote their position as an intellectual one.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 02:42 PM
Re: RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:04 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 01:32 PM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  You have failed to support your assertion that such evidence is "unknowable".

And


[Image: 43873369.jpg]

Ha ha love it, I need to provide evidence that it is unknowable. You would rather work off of the the assumption that you can assess it, despite a complete lack of evidence for this assumption.

Wow you are so dense. it's not an assumption to not know whether know, can know, or will know something.

I asked you to give a rationale because I was willing to think you had more than 1 claim for your position other than the 1 you keep repeating. So what if we are a product of a system? That's not a valid grounding scientifically that shows we can't go beyond it. We are also the product of a biological system and we're following the trail of information to learn about that systems previous form. To assert there's a limit we can't reach at this stage is presumptuous.

We would rather not make an assertion. While you would rather make one. That's our difference.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 02:50 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:42 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:04 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Ha ha love it, I need to provide evidence that it is unknowable. You would rather work off of the the assumption that you can assess it, despite a complete lack of evidence for this assumption.

Quote:Wow you are so dense. it's not an assumption to not know whether know, can know, or will know something.

I asked you to give a rationale because I was willing to think you had more than 1 claim for your position other than the 1 you keep repeating. So what if we are a product of a system? That's not a valid grounding scientifically that shows we can't go beyond it. We are also the product of a biological system and we're following the trail of information to learn about that systems previous form. To assert there's a limit we can't reach at this stage is presumptuous.

We would rather not make an assertion. While you would rather make one. That's our difference.

You make implied assertions to rationalise your materialist position. That you can't admit this is your problem.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 02:59 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:38 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:31 PM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  You would happily accept any claim at all without backing evidence -- the moon is made of cheese, there are fairies and leprechauns and pink dragons and unicorns, etc. This is what you are undeniably arguing for when you claim there is no need to back a given claim with evidence. You can have that for yourself if you want it, but it's fucking stupid.


We know better.



You don't speak for me and what I expect, you pathetic shitstain.








OH, look, it's talking to itself again. HoboLaughat

I love how you use the fairies, moon is made of cheese type argument as if they provide anything of value.


It's called Reductio Ad Absurdum. You wouldn't understand. And even if you could, you would refuse to understand.


Quote:The irony is many atheists promote their position as an intellectual one.


It's a logical, rational one, which is something you don't know anything about.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 03:17 PM
Re: RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 02:50 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:42 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  I asked you to give a rationale because I was willing to think you had more than 1 claim for your position other than the 1 you keep repeating. So what if we are a product of a system? That's not a valid grounding scientifically that shows we can't go beyond it. We are also the product of a biological system and we're following the trail of information to learn about that systems previous form. To assert there's a limit we can't reach at this stage is presumptuous.

We would rather not make an assertion. While you would rather make one. That's our difference.

You make implied assertions to rationalise your materialist position. That you can't admit this is your problem.

How? How about you be intellectual honest point opposed to making assertions and complain about your inferred views.

I'm actually willing to accept my positions may be wrong. Even skeptical of that materialistic view, but no other valid claim overshadows it.

Why are you okay with making assertions?

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 04:26 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 03:17 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  
(19-01-2014 02:50 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  You make implied assertions to rationalise your materialist position. That you can't admit this is your problem.

How? How about you be intellectual honest point opposed to making assertions and complain about your inferred views.

I'm actually willing to accept my positions may be wrong. Even skeptical of that materialistic view, but no other valid claim overshadows it.

Why are you okay with making assertions?

How would you expect materialism to be proven wrong?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-01-2014, 04:43 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
[Image: dude-what-if-matrix.jpg]

[Image: 3d366d5c-72a0-4228-b835-f404c2970188_zps...1381867723]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes cheapthrillseaker's post
19-01-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(19-01-2014 04:43 PM)cheapthrillseaker Wrote:  [Image: dude-what-if-matrix.jpg]

Love people who think the matrix was deep.

[Image: puddle-stomping1.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: