3 questions for atheists
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 8 Votes - 1.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-01-2014, 03:07 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 02:18 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  ... and take this wholly than thou bullshit perspective ...

Ah, I see that in addition to your ignorance and stupidity, you are also largely illiterate. Thumbsup

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
08-01-2014, 03:07 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 02:53 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 02:38 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Yes try applying them to your view.

I have, that is how I am an agnostic atheist. I don't claim knowledge of (agnostic) or belief in gods (atheist).

Did you even look at the definitions? I won't ask if you understood them.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-01-2014, 03:10 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:07 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 02:53 PM)Chas Wrote:  I have, that is how I am an agnostic atheist. I don't claim knowledge of (agnostic) or belief in gods (atheist).

Did you even look at the definitions? I won't ask if you understood them.

Obviously I did since I bolded the applicable one. It is used as an adjective. Do you know what an adjective is?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Chas's post
08-01-2014, 03:10 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:07 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 02:18 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  ... and take this wholly than thou bullshit perspective ...

Ah, I see that in addition to your ignorance and stupidity, you are also largely illiterate. Thumbsup

meh, holy. Why are so many atheists so simple minded? It appears that the attempt to appear rational on an irrational subject completely throws you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-01-2014, 03:14 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
*brownshirt walks into a bar*
A black guy bumps into him.
Brownshirt replies, "gosh, why are so many black people so clumsy?"
Brownshirt does not understand why he sounds like an idiot prick.

I prefer fantasy, but I have to live in reality.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Adrianime's post
08-01-2014, 03:14 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:06 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 02:56 PM)Chas Wrote:  Are you brain-damaged? Atheist means without a belief in gods. I have no belief in gods because there is no evidence for their existence.
I make no assumption about, or claim as to, the availability of evidence.

Lack of evidence simply means lack of evidence.

You don't entertain the notion that it cannot be unknowable, as it lacks proof of being unknowable.

You're going down fast. You're scrabling to hold onto something... How many negatives was that?

Its like you're drawing sentence fragments from a hat at random.

"Hmmm, that sounds like a good argument"
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-01-2014, 03:17 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:10 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 03:07 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  Did you even look at the definitions? I won't ask if you understood them.

Obviously I did since I bolded the applicable one. It is used as an adjective. Do you know what an adjective is?

Oh of course it's an adjective for the noun of either theist or atheist. Laughat

Yes, did you understand what this means? "asserting the uncertainty of all claims to knowledge." Does this mean we don't know if something exists, or that we cannot know? If you assert uncertainty it should be fairly obvious to anyone with half a brain.

That reminds me, back to my other question could you be a agnostic theist?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-01-2014, 03:18 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:14 PM)Adrianime Wrote:  *brownshirt walks into a bar*
A black guy bumps into him.
Brownshirt replies, "gosh, why are so many black people so clumsy?"
Brownshirt does not understand why he sounds like an idiot prick.

You sound like a thick cunt without a point or understanding of what's being said.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-01-2014, 03:19 PM (This post was last modified: 08-01-2014 03:22 PM by Tartarus Sauce.)
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 02:35 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 02:28 PM)Chas Wrote:  No. I don't say that knowledge can or can't be obtained, just that it hasn't been obtained. Huxley died in 1895, I don't give a shit what his definition was.

...if you use a lack of evidence to justify your position you've assumed evidence must be available otherwise why do you depend on it?

That is complete and total bullshit.

Lack of evidence is used as a justification to disregard the hypothesis as valid UNTIL that evidence is presented, not that it actually exists. It may never show up because it doesn't exist, it may never show up because we never find it, it may never show up because it exists but we are incapable of comprehending it, but until (and it may never) shows up, it's just a worthless assertion with no standing and no use and is therefore a waste of time seriously contemplating.

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Tartarus Sauce's post
08-01-2014, 03:20 PM
RE: 3 questions for atheists
(08-01-2014 03:14 PM)WeAreTheCosmos Wrote:  
(08-01-2014 03:06 PM)Brownshirt Wrote:  You don't entertain the notion that it cannot be unknowable, as it lacks proof of being unknowable.

You're going down fast. You're scrabling to hold onto something... How many negatives was that?

Its like you're drawing sentence fragments from a hat at random.

"Hmmm, that sounds like a good argument"

Since you're struggling there I will help you.

It can only be knowable as it lacks proof of being unknowable. Did that make it easier for your brain?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: