9/11 Coincidence ?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-03-2011, 10:54 PM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
Alright then, deny the overwhelming evidence of 9/11 being an inside job along with lot's of other terrorist plots by your own government, and how they never was suppose to be oversea fighting a pointless war. We shouldn't be doing this losing to much tragedy. War doesn't solve anything....

"don't jump to conclusions until your 99%"

"dreams are the best source of creativity" me
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 12:48 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
You are applying theist logic - "prove god doesn't exist" - I don't have to to be an atheist , I simply refuse to believe in God without evidence.
I refuse to believe 9/11 was an inside job without evidence.
The burden of proof is on you Laxion.

Atheism is a religion like OFF is a TV channel !!!

Proud of my genetic relatives Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 01:21 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
Also Laxion many many organizations outside the government shown all the events of like the towers collapsing is scientifically possible.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo...ws/1227842

[Image: 20060619.gif]

[Image: buddhasig.png]
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” ~ Gautama Buddha
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 01:45 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
The evidence are in the videos, so do I have to detailed write it out ? D:

"don't jump to conclusions until your 99%"

"dreams are the best source of creativity" me
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 01:48 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
(12-03-2011 01:45 AM)Laxion Wrote:  The evidence are in the videos, so do I have to detailed write it out ? D:

That's not evidence. It has already been debunked many, many times.

"Liberty without socialism is privilege, injustice; socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality." Mikhail Bakunin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 02:02 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
To quote Maddox:

Quote:The fact that this man is alive.
[Image: dylanaverybig.jpg]
...is proof that "Loose Change" is bullshit.
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/...911_morons

[Image: buddhasig.png]
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” ~ Gautama Buddha
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 07:01 AM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
Quote:and that website gives very little information, the videos showed so much evidence, did it say the building was a class A structure, and bomb proof ?
The website, and their links, were about steel structured buildings that collapsed due to fire before 911.

Part 2, 'free fall speed'.
You can see debris falling down faster than the building collapsed, so it collapsed under free fall speed.
http://www.debunking911.com/Collapse3.jpg
Quote:The kinetic energy of the top part of the tower impacting the
floor below was found to be about 8.4 larger than the plastic
energy absorption capability of the underlying story, and considerably
higher than that if fracturing were taken into account
Bažant and Zhou 2002a. This fact, along with the fact that
during the progressive collapse of underlying stories Figs. 1d
and 2 the loss of gravitational potential per story is much greater
than the energy dissipated per story, was sufficient for Bažant and
Zhou 2002a to conclude, purely on energy grounds, that the
tower was doomed once the top part of the tower dropped through
the height of one story or even 0.5 m. It was also observed that
this conclusion made any calculations of the dynamics of progressive
collapse after the first single-story drop of upper part superfluous.
The relative smallness of energy absorption capability compared to the kinetic energy also sufficed to explain, without any further calculations, why the collapse duration could not have
been much longer say, twice as long or more than the duration
of a free fall from the tower top.
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people...rs/466.pdf

Part 3, 'the explosions'.

Small things can make explosive sounds under certain conditions. Electric devices explode and flash in fires.
Which do you think is more probable, 1. alot of explosives were planted to the building by the conspirators to make sure that the buildings collapse or 2. something else made the sounds. In a demolition, the explosives make a huge sound that is heard miles away. You like videos, so see the demolition at 2:19. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacYjsS-g...ded#at=207

Part 4, 'no plane seen'

Which is more probable, 1. all of the eye-witnesses were bribed and none of them have squealed about it not being a plane or 2. eye-wintessers being right and the plane hitting too fast for a 6FPS surveillance camera to see it?

Part 5, 'new pearl harbor'

Probably a quote mine. http://911myths.com/html/new_pearl_harbour.html

Correct me when I'm wrong.
Accept me or go to hell.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 02:18 PM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
The fact that the towers collapsed like that puzzled me for a long time. Until I saw a picture on the internal construction of those. that explained a lot.
What still puzzles me a bit is the fact that there are no aeroplane parts in front of the pentagon. Perhaps I’ve been looking at the wrong pictures. Smile

It’s quite a piloting job to hit the towers. In 2001 I was working for a company that has full flight simulators for rent. A few days after 9/11 we fired up the sim and tried to hit the towers. We missed for 6 times.

Observer

Agnostic atheist
Secular humanist
Emotional rationalist
Disclaimer: Don’t mix the personal opinion above with the absolute and objective truth. Remember to think for yourself. Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 05:02 PM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
Three things,

1. Maybe it is possible that there was thermate (not thermite) was created from the collapse of the towers, this may have been caused by a reaction between any number of chemicals within the building and any of the chemicals in the plane, I'm not a chemist, so I can not say that there was no reaction at all to create thermate. That is the only part of the conspiracy which I see as plausible at all. I do not think it was intended however.

2. I've seen videos with the planes in them (which I thought was strange considering it was 2001, who walks around with a video camera? New Yorkers apparently). I even saw the second plane as live footage, the whole school watched the news that day.

3. You really need to get away from these conspiracies, your logic is becoming more and more fallacious the more you try to defend them.

By the way, I hate watching movies, especially on youtube, text sources are the golden to me.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2011, 06:05 PM
RE: 9/11 Coincidence ?
"Conspiracy theories are man-made to assist in controlling the weak minded individuals because during times of atrocity and despair they feel strength in numbers."

"Liberty without socialism is privilege, injustice; socialism without liberty is slavery and brutality." Mikhail Bakunin
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: