9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
16-11-2015, 01:54 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(16-11-2015 11:46 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  I didn't say they were not dislodged. I said there were no witnesses reporting their being dislodged. Anyone in the areas exactly where the planes came in probably didn't survive anyway.

But the CLAIM of fireproofing coming off is nothing but that. A CLAIM! Even scraping from flying airplane pieces should only affect one side.

If the shock of impact could make much fireproofing come off it should have knocked lots of ceiling tiles down on levels just below the impact. Where did any witnesses report that?

Who said witnesses reported the fireproofing was compromised? The investigation afterwards identified that that had happened. You are so blinded by your misconceptions you can't understand anything being said to you.

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-11-2015, 02:19 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(16-11-2015 12:14 PM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  So...other than you seeming being unable to believe what you've seen.....

(02-11-2015 01:16 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Please, share your thoughts on what you think happened on that day.

Actually putting forward a single positive statement would derail the trollercoaster of JAQing off.

You know that. I know that. And he definitely knows that.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-11-2015, 04:49 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(16-11-2015 11:46 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(15-11-2015 10:09 PM)Chas Wrote:  Ceiling tiles weren't dislodged? You are fucking nuts.

I didn't say they were not dislodged. I said there were no witnesses reporting their being dislodged. Anyone in the areas exactly where the planes came in probably didn't survive anyway.

But the CLAIM of fireproofing coming off is nothing but that. A CLAIM! Even scraping from flying airplane pieces should only affect one side.

If the shock of impact could make much fireproofing come off it should have knocked lots of ceiling tiles down on levels just below the impact. Where did any witnesses report that?

But it should not be that difficult to do simulations of how hot the steel could get in TWO HOURS without fireproofing. But that would require knowing the amount of steel due to the conduction of heat through the steel.

But you BELIEVERS don't want accurate data on the amount of steel on every level, so how is the effect of conduction supposed to be analysed? Of course that cannot be seen from outside the building. BELIEVERS just accept what they see without thinking about the details necessary to make it happen. How can anyone know the steel could weaken in two hours without knowing the quantity of steel? Laugh out load

psik

Steel does not heat uniformly. Do you know the rate of diffusion of heat in steel? The precise amount of steel doesn't matter.

Yet another meaningless red herring from psychofucker.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 10:15 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(16-11-2015 01:54 PM)unfogged Wrote:  Who said witnesses reported the fireproofing was compromised? The investigation afterwards identified that that had happened. You are so blinded by your misconceptions you can't understand anything being said to you.

So tell us the EVIDENCE that the so called investigation provided for that CLAIM.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 10:57 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-11-2015 10:15 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(16-11-2015 01:54 PM)unfogged Wrote:  Who said witnesses reported the fireproofing was compromised? The investigation afterwards identified that that had happened. You are so blinded by your misconceptions you can't understand anything being said to you.

So tell us the EVIDENCE that the so called investigation provided for that CLAIM.

psik

Yawn Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-11-2015 10:15 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(16-11-2015 01:54 PM)unfogged Wrote:  Who said witnesses reported the fireproofing was compromised? The investigation afterwards identified that that had happened. You are so blinded by your misconceptions you can't understand anything being said to you.

So tell us the EVIDENCE that the so called investigation provided for that CLAIM.

psik

The link to the NIST reports has already been given. It doesn't take much searching to find their descriptions of the investigations they did into the type of fireproofing used, known issues, and the effects of the impact of the debris on it. Start with NIST NCSTAR 1-6D (not that you will read any of it or, if you do, understand what it is saying)

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 01:33 PM (This post was last modified: 17-11-2015 03:00 PM by adey67.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-11-2015 10:15 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(16-11-2015 01:54 PM)unfogged Wrote:  Who said witnesses reported the fireproofing was compromised? The investigation afterwards identified that that had happened. You are so blinded by your misconceptions you can't understand anything being said to you.

So tell us the EVIDENCE that the so called investigation provided for that CLAIM.

psik
Er so a national sanctioned investigation is considered a so called investigation because its conclusions differ to yours ? Its not just about the physics of materials ( although this is majorly important) the whole issue is multifaceted involving many different sciences combined. If a moron like me can understand this why can't you?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 02:32 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Deliberate implosions video. Thumbsup

Notice how the explosives are always set on the lower supports and painfully obvious as the detonations are triggered.

On 9/11 there were no detonations anywhere below where the airplanes impacted. Remember that people were fleeing from the higher floors below the impact floors and first responders were heading up. No one reported any explosions during this time.

It amazes me that psychohack can maintain that anything other than the planes and the subsequent fires brought the buildings down.





Psycho, no need to respond to this post, it isn’t aimed at you, this is meant for the logically thinking, non-brained damaged members. Drinking Beverage

“I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man’s reasoning powers are not above the monkey’s.”~Mark Twain
“Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man - who has no gills.”~ Ambrose Bierce
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-11-2015, 02:53 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
He will argue that he doesn't maintain any position regarding the reason for the cause of the fall of the buildings and that he is only interested in the physics. Which we and he knows is bullshit lol
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-11-2015, 03:34 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-11-2015 02:53 PM)adey67 Wrote:  He will argue that he doesn't maintain any position regarding the reason for the cause of the fall of the buildings and that he is only interested in the physics. Which we and he knows is bullshit lol

Like you know so much when you don't notice that the NIST does not even specify the amount of concrete in the towers and how the steel must be distributed to hold it up.

The ignorant accusing someone of being ignorant. Laugh out load Laugh out load

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: