9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
26-12-2015, 02:15 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 12:10 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  What would that do to the Center of Gravity?

Oh yeah, you need a PhD in physics to think of that.

Oh yeah, and if you never say anything about conspiracies in relation to 9/11 then one must be psychotic for mentioning physics.

Do morons need to rationalize their stupidity?

psik

The center of gravity of the building has nothing to do with anything.
That you think it does demonstrates your utter misunderstanding of the entire issue.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
26-12-2015, 02:57 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 02:15 PM)Chas Wrote:  The center of gravity of the building has nothing to do with anything.
That you think it does demonstrates your utter misunderstanding of the entire issue.

Let's take a tall man-made structure that we have center of gravity data on:

The CN Tower in Toronto:

Quote:The base of the tower floats on bedrock more than 12 meters below ground. The tower is stable because it is so massive and heavy and its center of gravity is low — less than 61 meters from the ground.
https://prezi.com/6mrmrokxjxsb/the-cn-tower/

Strangely that article does not specify the height of the tower.

Quote:“It takes a fair amount of breath to blow it over,” says the architect, who estimates it would take a 1,600 km/H wind to topple the 553-metre tower, “a wind that would never exist.”
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/02/..._last.html

So the center of mass is at 1/9th the height of the CN Tower. Although even that does not truly specify the distribution of mass it does mean the vast majority must be toward the bottom. Curiously I cannot find CoG or mass distribution of any skyscraper.

But in the case of the north tower it raises the question of how could the lighter and weaker top 13% of the north tower fall straight down and destroy the stronger and heavier lower 85% in less than 30 seconds?

The conservation of momentum is so unscientific.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 03:10 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
So....... from your above posting..... you seem to be having a hard time understanding the events clearly witnessed on the day.

Is such a comment fair/accurate, Psikeyhackr ?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 02:57 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  The conservation of momentum is so unscientific.

Is this what you mean?

[Image: momentum.gif]

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 04:06 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 03:12 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(26-12-2015 02:57 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  The conservation of momentum is so unscientific.

Is this what you mean?

[Image: momentum.gif]

No, I don't see the mass in that equation.

Of course you are free to explain the relevance of that equation to show how smart you are.

If that equation is not for masses greater than hundreds of kilograms and velocities less than 1% of light speed then what is the point?

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 04:29 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 12:48 PM)adey67 Wrote:  So I'm not a moron except when I am. Listen to Seth's show on conspiracy theories. Dude you called everyone a moron who disagrees with you re read your own posts man. You wanna know what,? I bet if we met and had a conversation we might actually like each other inspite of our differences.Its easy to be bitches to each other when we are on a keyboard with only a screen to separate us but we both have to have the balls to meet half way! Peace Adey

Well I tried I guess it was pointless. Sad
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 04:31 PM (This post was last modified: 26-12-2015 04:41 PM by adey67.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 04:06 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(26-12-2015 03:12 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Is this what you mean?

[Image: momentum.gif]

No, I don't see the mass in that equation.

Of course you are free to explain the relevance of that equation to show how smart you are.

If that equation is not for masses greater than hundreds of kilograms and velocities less than 1% of light speed then what is the point?

psik

Dude... oh never mind Sad
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 05:06 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 04:31 PM)adey67 Wrote:  
(26-12-2015 04:06 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  No, I don't see the mass in that equation.

Of course you are free to explain the relevance of that equation to show how smart you are.

If that equation is not for masses greater than hundreds of kilograms and velocities less than 1% of light speed then what is the point?

psik

Dude... oh never mind Sad

ROFLMAO

Yeah, it is so impressive that you don't try to explain an equation that you posted. We are just supposed to assume that you know what it meant.

NOT! Laugh out load

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 05:24 PM (This post was last modified: 26-12-2015 05:57 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 04:06 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(26-12-2015 03:12 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Is this what you mean?

[Image: momentum.gif]

No, I don't see the mass in that equation.

Of course you are free to explain the relevance of that equation to show how smart you are.

If that equation is not for masses greater than hundreds of kilograms and velocities less than 1% of light speed then what is the point?

psik
[Image: momentum.gif]
[Image: maxwell_2.png]

Now do you get it?

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-12-2015, 05:53 PM (This post was last modified: 26-12-2015 07:32 PM by adey67.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(26-12-2015 05:06 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(26-12-2015 04:31 PM)adey67 Wrote:  Dude... oh never mind Sad

ROFLMAO

Yeah, it is so impressive that you don't try to explain an equation that you posted. We are just supposed to assume that you know what it meant.

NOT! Laugh out load

psik
Your right I don't but I diddnt post the equation
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: