9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
28-02-2016, 03:20 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
WOPR you really are a class 1 plonker if you think the government would waste any valuable resources on a crank in a forum. The article is five years old for fucks sake and are you really that paranoid ? If you are perhaps you should go see a doctor.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2016, 03:33 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(28-02-2016 03:20 AM)adey67 Wrote:  WOPR you really are a class 1 plonker if you think the government would waste any valuable resources on a crank in a forum. The article is five years old for fucks sake and are you really that paranoid ? If you are perhaps you should go see a doctor.

Probably caused by all that fluoride in the water. Hobo

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2016, 04:18 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(28-02-2016 03:33 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  
(28-02-2016 03:20 AM)adey67 Wrote:  WOPR you really are a class 1 plonker if you think the government would waste any valuable resources on a crank in a forum. The article is five years old for fucks sake and are you really that paranoid ? If you are perhaps you should go see a doctor.

Probably caused by all that fluoride in the water. Hobo
Hey now we are all government agents that means I can have a gun cool, Smith and Weston 40 cal please Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2016, 04:45 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(28-02-2016 04:18 AM)adey67 Wrote:  
(28-02-2016 03:33 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  Probably caused by all that fluoride in the water. Hobo
Hey now we are all government agents that means I can have a gun cool, Smith and Weston 40 cal please Big Grin

Well, fuck. In that case I want a HK Mark 23 SOCOM, because if it's good enough for Solid Snake, it's good enough for me!

[Image: wallpaper_metal_gear_solid_2_04_1600.jpg]

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes EvolutionKills's post
28-02-2016, 09:21 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Alpha warning: Subject WOPR suspects agent presence. We are compromised. Pull back, pull back!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like ghostexorcist's post
28-02-2016, 10:13 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(28-02-2016 09:21 AM)ghostexorcist Wrote:  Alpha warning: Subject WOPR suspects agent presence. We are compromised. Pull back, pull back!

Roger that message received and understood all agents stand down I repeat stand down we cannot stand against wopr and his superior intellect ( he wishes) Laugh out load
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2016, 05:05 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED



NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Banjo's post
29-02-2016, 01:55 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-02-2016 02:45 PM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  Are you seriously comparing the weight of the aircraft against the weight of the building? Are you that fucking clueless?

And after all this was done you would be just as fucking clueless.

So why did the NIST say in three places in their report that they needed the weight on each level of the tower to analyse the motion of the building due to the aircraft impact.

How much did they say the south tower deflected due to the impact?

[50,468]
psik

Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 Fiziks has been History
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-02-2016, 04:56 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(29-02-2016 01:55 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(25-02-2016 02:45 PM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  Are you seriously comparing the weight of the aircraft against the weight of the building? Are you that fucking clueless?

And after all this was done you would be just as fucking clueless.

So why did the NIST say in three places in their report that they needed the weight on each level of the tower to analyse the motion of the building due to the aircraft impact.

How much did they say the south tower deflected due to the impact?

[50,468]
psik

The motion of the building due to impact is important for what reason?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-02-2016, 10:01 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Quote:Konstantin P. Petrov (August 23, 1945, Noginsk, Moscow Region - July 21, 2009, Moscow) - Soviet and Russian military leader, a Russian social and political activist. Candidate of Technical Sciences. Member of International Informatization Academy. Major-General. Prematurely discharged from the Armed Forces in November 1995. Chairman of the Presidium of the Central Council of the political party "Course of Truth and Unity." Head of the department at the Udmurt State University.-Russian general reveals truth about 9 11

Here is the video of the Russian General revealing information about 9/11:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OncBdtnPMU
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: