9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
17-03-2016, 03:43 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
And I said what about any conspiracy theory?


Please see pages 160 & 161 of this thread.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-03-2016, 07:56 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-03-2016 03:43 AM)adey67 Wrote:  And I said what about any conspiracy theory?


Please see pages 160 & 161 of this thread.

Well.. the problem with Psikeyhackr is getting them to post anything which resembles a coherent, actual point.

It's always just been strange, disjointed ramblings about 'Concrete' and 'Center of mass' among other weird minor details.

When asked rather simple things such as;

"What do you think happened on the day in question?"

There isn't much of any sort of substance being replied with.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Peebothuhul's post
17-03-2016, 08:01 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-03-2016 07:56 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  
(17-03-2016 03:43 AM)adey67 Wrote:  And I said what about any conspiracy theory?


Please see pages 160 & 161 of this thread.

Well.. the problem with Psikeyhackr is getting them to post anything which resembles a coherent, actual point.

It's always just been strange, disjointed ramblings about 'Concrete' and 'Center of mass' among other weird minor details.

When asked rather simple things such as;

"What do you think happened on the day in question?"

There isn't much of any sort of substance being replied with.

Don't forget the Spoxe!

[Image: DSC_1889-800x344.jpg]

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-03-2016, 09:57 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-03-2016 07:56 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  When asked rather simple things such as;

"What do you think happened on the day in question?"

There isn't much of any sort of substance being replied with.

"Much" substance?

Wink

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes cjlr's post
17-03-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-03-2016 09:57 AM)cjlr Wrote:  
(17-03-2016 07:56 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  When asked rather simple things such as;

"What do you think happened on the day in question?"

There isn't much of any sort of substance being replied with.

"Much" substance?

Wink

Laugh out load

Well.. I always try and be nice. Tongue
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-03-2016, 12:44 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(17-03-2016 07:56 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Well.. the problem with Psikeyhackr is getting them to post anything which resembles a coherent, actual point.

Stating that skyscrapers must hold themselves up isn't a coherent actual point?

This has certain obvious implications.

The bottom of the skyscraper must be strong enough to support more weight than the top. This should mean more steel. So as long as we do not have data on the distribution of steel in the building then this is scientific nonsense.

Of course that isn't a problem for people who can BELIEVE things without data.

By using paper loops in my washer model I demonstrated that the lower portion had to get stronger toward the bottom hold the static load. Your models demonstrated what exactly?

psik

Physics is Phutile
Fiziks is Fundamental
Since 9/11 Fiziks has been History
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-03-2016, 12:47 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(19-03-2016 12:44 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  By using paper loops in my washer model I demonstrated that the lower portion had to get stronger toward the bottom hold the static load.

Dude, you wouldn't have even received a certificate of participation in a fifth grade science fair with that "demonstration".

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-03-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(19-03-2016 12:44 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  By using paper loops in my washer model I demonstrated that the lower portion had to get stronger toward the bottom hold the static load.

Oh brother, we got a real rocket engineer here Rolleyes

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-03-2016, 08:08 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
I don't have to look at the past pages to know that the same arguments were debunked 10 times and yet the truthers still don't get it.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-03-2016, 08:19 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
At work.

Never have I wanted to simply post:

"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHH!!!"

As much as now.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: