9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
24-06-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(24-06-2015 10:08 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  No, I was serious. I want you to go back to talking about your conspiracy theory regard the Twin Towers. It was so much more entertaining, buddy, than this pseudointellectual economic *yawn* discussion.

Whodunit? And why? And why that spot? And what steps did they take after the "operation" to ensure its secrecy? And how did you, of all people, come to the Truth?

Have you checked your garage tonight? Have you secured your computer against NSA spyware? I'm worried that this information might die with you before you're able to lay it out ... so please, lay it out here.


[Image: 2258345996_a5fe2f9ced.jpg]

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 06:39 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(24-06-2015 09:28 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(24-06-2015 08:33 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Why is that "really important"?


That number would mean what? I should not buy a car because it's gonna wear out? ....

Yes, it is a pity that sarcasm is beyond the comprehension of some people.

But then logic is beyond them also.

The depreciation cannot be eliminated. Therefore economists getting Nobel Prizes while not mentioning that depreciation for decades makes how much sense? Running the economy of a planet with 7 billion people while ignoring Demand Side Depreciation is so intelligent.

Kind of like physicists not talking about the distribution of steel and concrete to compute Potential Energy accurately.

psik

No, really, why is it important?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 07:47 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(24-06-2015 10:08 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  I want you to go back to talking about your conspiracy theory regard the Twin Towers.

Provide a quote to what I ever said about a "conspiracy" regarding the Twin Towers.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 07:49 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 07:47 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(24-06-2015 10:08 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  I want you to go back to talking about your conspiracy theory regard the Twin Towers.

Provide a quote to what I ever said about a "conspiracy" regarding the Twin Towers.

psik

How's your foil hat going?

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 08:41 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 07:47 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(24-06-2015 10:08 PM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  I want you to go back to talking about your conspiracy theory regard the Twin Towers.

Provide a quote to what I ever said about a "conspiracy" regarding the Twin Towers.

psik

So you don't think it was the result of a conspiracy?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 08:48 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 08:41 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  
(25-06-2015 07:47 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Provide a quote to what I ever said about a "conspiracy" regarding the Twin Towers.

psik

So you don't think it was the result of a conspiracy?

Next he'll claim he's the official government spokesperson Rolleyes

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
25-06-2015, 12:34 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 08:41 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  
(25-06-2015 07:47 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Provide a quote to what I ever said about a "conspiracy" regarding the Twin Towers.

psik

So you don't think it was the result of a conspiracy?

Talking about conspiracies before the physics is resolved is asinine. Human beings can't change physics. If the physics dictates that there had to be a conspiracy then that is too damn bad.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 12:39 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Of course it's a coverup! 9/11 was an insect job!

[Image: 52616082.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes natachan's post
25-06-2015, 07:35 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 12:34 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Talking about conspiracies before the physics is resolved is asinine.

Have the physicists and architects and structural and construction and demolition engineers made any further progress on this yet? Keep us posted. Thumbsup

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-06-2015, 07:50 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(25-06-2015 07:35 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Have the physicists and architects and structural and construction and demolition engineers made any further progress on this yet? Keep us posted. Thumbsup

The problem is you aren't smart enough to figure out middle school physics for yourself.

You haven't noticed that the physicists have not said anything about the distribution of steel in the skyscrapers. The funny thing, is that really their job? Why would physicists think about stuff so simple? But then why haven't the engineers discussed the obvious?

So the problem is 7th graders should understand more steel had to be toward the bottom. Therefore that affects the Potential Energy.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: