9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
02-07-2015, 10:45 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
It's shocking people trying to protect against far more frequent dangerous things have done studies testing equake stability of buildings...

but not tested a potential theory on how a building couldn't come down from a plane crashing into it? You've got to admit you are clearly viewing things through a bizarre lens with that idea. It's a entirely jaded view upon one angle.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-07-2015, 01:02 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 10:38 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(01-07-2015 03:04 PM)morondog Wrote:  Psikey: Nothing! I know it all already. I know that no matter what you guys know, you're wrong, because you're not me and I know about the words "potential energy". I don't know what the fuck they mean but who cares about details like that. Trololol.

Then a few good experiments to prove it should not be that difficult.

Curious that no engineering school has come up with one in nearly 14 years. But they can do stuff like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oJ-4Oq5YRA

psik

OK, let me say this one last time, and I think I speak for the rest of the Forum when I say this:

A FUCKING JETLINER SMASHED INTO THE TOWERS DOING 500+ MPH AND EXPLODED CAUSING A CATASTROPHIC STRUCTURAL FAILURE.

200,000 lbs of flying projectile carrying upwards of 15,000 gallons of jetfuel flew directly into the buildings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767
and you want a school project experiment to show how this could possibly be able to bring the buildings down. Consider

YOU SIR, ARE A RETARD, NO DISREPECT. Yes



Now go home and play with your washers and closet rod.

“I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man’s reasoning powers are not above the monkey’s.”~Mark Twain
“Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man - who has no gills.”~ Ambrose Bierce
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Full Circle's post
02-07-2015, 01:23 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 01:02 PM)Full Circle Wrote:  
(02-07-2015 10:38 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Then a few good experiments to prove it should not be that difficult.

Curious that no engineering school has come up with one in nearly 14 years. But they can do stuff like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oJ-4Oq5YRA

psik

OK, let me say this one last time, and I think I speak for the rest of the Forum when I say this:

A FUCKING JETLINER SMASHED INTO THE TOWERS DOING 500+ MPH AND EXPLODED CAUSING A CATASTROPHIC STRUCTURAL FAILURE.

200,000 lbs of flying projectile carrying upwards of 15,000 gallons of jetfuel flew directly into the buildings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767
and you want a school project experiment to show how this could possibly be able to bring the buildings down. Consider

YOU SIR, ARE A RETARD, NO DISREPECT. Yes

Now go home and play with your washers and closet rod.

Typical, you people can't get your data correct.

It was 300,000 lb and 10,000 gallons of fuel. 550 mph for the south tower and 440 mph for the north.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-07-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 01:02 PM)Full Circle Wrote:  
(02-07-2015 10:38 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Then a few good experiments to prove it should not be that difficult.

Curious that no engineering school has come up with one in nearly 14 years. But they can do stuff like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oJ-4Oq5YRA

psik

OK, let me say this one last time, and I think I speak for the rest of the Forum when I say this:

A FUCKING JETLINER SMASHED INTO THE TOWERS DOING 500+ MPH AND EXPLODED CAUSING A CATASTROPHIC STRUCTURAL FAILURE.

200,000 lbs of flying projectile carrying upwards of 15,000 gallons of jetfuel flew directly into the buildings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767
and you want a school project experiment to show how this could possibly be able to bring the buildings down. Consider

YOU SIR, ARE A RETARD, NO DISREPECT. Yes



Now go home and play with your washers and closet rod.

I think we should take psycho's kindergarten washer and closet rod hilarious non-experiment and shoot a shotgun slug into it to see what would happen. That would at least be more realistic. And it sounds like a lot of fun!

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
02-07-2015, 03:23 PM (This post was last modified: 02-07-2015 06:48 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 01:23 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Typical, you people can't get your data correct.

It was 300,000 lb and 10,000 gallons of fuel. 550 mph for the south tower and 440 mph for the north.

And yet you completely ignored the impact of this kinetic energy in your idiotic non-analysis. What engineering school did you fail out of? ... Oh silly me, like any engineering school would ever admit you in the first place. Hell if they had admission requirements to High School you'd never get in. You're literally a fucking ignorant idiot. A monument should be raised to your ignorance.

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like GirlyMan's post
02-07-2015, 06:49 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 01:23 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(02-07-2015 01:02 PM)Full Circle Wrote:  OK, let me say this one last time, and I think I speak for the rest of the Forum when I say this:

A FUCKING JETLINER SMASHED INTO THE TOWERS DOING 500+ MPH AND EXPLODED CAUSING A CATASTROPHIC STRUCTURAL FAILURE.

200,000 lbs of flying projectile carrying upwards of 15,000 gallons of jetfuel flew directly into the buildings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767
and you want a school project experiment to show how this could possibly be able to bring the buildings down. Consider

YOU SIR, ARE A RETARD, NO DISREPECT. Yes

Now go home and play with your washers and closet rod.

Typical, you people can't get your data correct.

It was 300,000 lb and 10,000 gallons of fuel. 550 mph for the south tower and 440 mph for the north.

psik

Facepalm

“I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man’s reasoning powers are not above the monkey’s.”~Mark Twain
“Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man - who has no gills.”~ Ambrose Bierce
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Full Circle's post
02-07-2015, 09:37 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha oh my Lawd the stupid, it hurts. Big Grin

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Banjo's post
03-07-2015, 05:35 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Sorry but 9/11 was not inside job. The planes were not missles, the buildings took more than 10 seconds to fall, etc etc.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2015, 07:54 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(03-07-2015 05:35 PM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  Sorry but 9/11 was not inside job. The planes were not missles, the buildings took more than 10 seconds to fall, etc etc.

When did you become Captain America? I thought you despised America. Have you had a change of heart? Are you here to save us now Zeke?

Trivia question: In what year was Captain America born?

“I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man’s reasoning powers are not above the monkey’s.”~Mark Twain
“Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man - who has no gills.”~ Ambrose Bierce
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2015, 08:14 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(02-07-2015 10:38 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Then a few good experiments to prove it should not be that difficult.

Curious that no engineering school has come up with one in nearly 14 years. But they can do stuff like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oJ-4Oq5YRA
In case you didn't know/realize it, an earthquake and a jet hitting a building, are not the same thing.

[Image: fdyq20.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: