9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
05-07-2015, 09:47 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(05-07-2015 01:14 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  The only thing that needs to be tested is whether the top 13% could fall and destroy the lower 85% that had to be strong enough to support everything above.

... said the dumbass who has spent a few pages talking about potential energy ... as if he knows something about it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2015, 04:55 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(05-07-2015 08:05 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(05-07-2015 03:43 PM)Chas Wrote:  Asked and answered - repeatedly. The lower 85% was heavily damaged.

Tell us where the NIST report says the lower 85% of the north tower was heavily damaged by airliner impact and fire.

psik

Apparently you can't read. Consider

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2015, 03:50 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(06-07-2015 04:55 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(05-07-2015 08:05 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Tell us where the NIST report says the lower 85% of the north tower was heavily damaged by airliner impact and fire.

psik

Apparently you can't read. Consider

YAWN! Boring insults are so impressive. But then you can't find what the NIST never wrote.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(06-07-2015 03:50 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  YAWN! Boring insults are so impressive. But then you can't find what the NIST never wrote.

psik

So... my quote did not answer your question?

Might I get an answer to mine?

Much cheers to all.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Peebothuhul's post
06-07-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(06-07-2015 03:50 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(06-07-2015 04:55 AM)Chas Wrote:  Apparently you can't read. Consider

YAWN! Boring insults are so impressive. But then you can't find what the NIST never wrote.

psik

God of the Gaps is no decent reply. Work moar, kid.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Thumpalumpacus's post
07-07-2015, 03:14 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(06-07-2015 03:50 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(06-07-2015 04:55 AM)Chas Wrote:  Apparently you can't read. Consider

YAWN! Boring insults are so impressive. But then you can't find what the NIST never wrote.

psik

This is what I was taught at blacksmithing school.

. "Heat also causes steel to lose strength and stiffness. Thermal expansion occurs at temperatures much lower than those required to reduce steel strength and stiffness."

Popular Mechanics even debunked this conspiracy theory.


Hey psik.

[Image: 163c4fac4112bffd7e850ace6eb33503.jpg]

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2015, 04:58 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Goodness you guys. Blatantly ignoring arguments being presented because you don't like the conclusions. When I first joined, I thought you were noble seekers of truth. Evidently not.

Truth seeker.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2015, 05:02 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(07-07-2015 04:58 AM)diddo97 Wrote:  Goodness you guys. Blatantly ignoring arguments being presented because you don't like the conclusions. When I first joined, I thought you were noble seekers of truth. Evidently not.

Well I am a qualified blacksmith who worked with hot metals. It seems perfectly reasonable to me that the metal structure supporting so much weight would not hold.

Anyway there is no evidence to support these conspiracy theories. Believe me, if there was evidence that GWB had a hand in it, I would shout it from the rooftops.

Great America got it's arse kicked that day by a bunch of religious zealots. Sadly some Americans cannot get over this fact.

On that day, America lost. Sadly, unlike December 7th 1941, there was no clear enemy to pursue.

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-07-2015, 05:03 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(06-07-2015 03:50 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(06-07-2015 04:55 AM)Chas Wrote:  Apparently you can't read. Consider

YAWN! Boring insults are so impressive. But then you can't find what the NIST never wrote.

psik

Read Chapter 9 of the report - it is discussed in detail.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
07-07-2015, 05:18 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(07-07-2015 04:58 AM)diddo97 Wrote:  Goodness you guys. Blatantly ignoring arguments being presented because you don't like the conclusions. When I first joined, I thought you were noble seekers of truth. Evidently not.

Indeed that is the always curious flaw with conspiracy followers. They don't actually seek any truth or skeptical approach. They'll renounce what they think is the mainstream ideas and think they have a profound greater knowledge, but never actually doubt their positions doubts. They just repeat this value of having a contrasting view making them wiser

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like ClydeLee's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: