9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-07-2015, 04:12 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 02:24 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(07-07-2015 05:03 AM)Chas Wrote:  Read Chapter 9 of the report - it is discussed in detail.

So you are claiming it is HERE:

http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publicati..._id=101030

I downloaded everything years ago.

That link says it is about WTC2. I said "85 intact stories" so it would have to be WTC1. I can't paste what is says because the pdf is password protected.

I would have to do it from home.

Can't you figure out the right building? The issue with the south tower is the tilted top 30 stories so it could only have been about 75 intact stories. Therefore the center of gravity of the top matters in addition to the collapse.

I tried accessing chapter 8 that claims to be about WTC1 but get this error from their site:

Error in custom script module

Here is the link:

http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publicati..._id=101356

psik

Your objections are all meaningless. The top tilted due to differential collapsing of supports - they were not identically weakened. There is no issue with the 'center of gravity' of that top section - it stayed within the footprint of the building.

Your lack of understanding of physics combined with bizarre gullibility has you questioning the obvious. You are being tedious.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like Chas's post
08-07-2015, 07:48 PM (This post was last modified: 08-07-2015 08:01 PM by WOPR.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Hello Banjo....

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  
(08-07-2015 09:09 AM)WOPR Wrote:  Hello ClydeLee.... How about a nice game of chess?

Either a troll alert or a one trick pony alert.

Sorry. I thought we were just having a kittle fun there.... no need to be (not saying you are necessarily) a whiny little name calling bitch about it.

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  Can you do better?

Better than what?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2015, 08:17 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 07:48 PM)WOPR Wrote:  Hello Banjo....

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  Either a troll alert or a one trick pony alert.

Sorry. I thought we were just having a kittle fun there.... no need to be (not saying you are necessarily) a whiny little name calling bitch about it.

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  Can you do better?

Better than what?

What an excellent first impression you're making wopr.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2015, 08:21 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 07:48 PM)WOPR Wrote:  Sorry. I thought we were just having a kittle fun there.... no need to be (not saying you are necessarily) a whiny little name calling bitch about it.




There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
08-07-2015, 09:03 PM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2015 07:43 AM by WOPR.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 08:17 PM)pablo Wrote:  
(08-07-2015 07:48 PM)WOPR Wrote:  Hello Banjo....


Sorry. I thought we were just having a kittle fun there.... no need to be (not saying you are necessarily) a whiny little name calling bitch about it.


Better than what?



What an excellent first impression you're making wopr.

Thank you. Like I said I thought we were just having a little fun there, so if you think Banjos response implying I'm a troll was appropriate you can just piss off.... pablo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes WOPR's post
08-07-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 09:03 PM)WOPR Wrote:  
(08-07-2015 08:17 PM)pablo Wrote:  What an excellent first impression you're making wopr.

Thank you. Like I said I thought we were just having a little fun there, so if you think Banjos response implying I'm a troll was appropriate you can just piss off... pablo.

You're certainly not trying to disappoint.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like pablo's post
09-07-2015, 05:53 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(08-07-2015 07:48 PM)WOPR Wrote:  Hello Banjo....

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  Either a troll alert or a one trick pony alert.

Sorry. I thought we were just having a kittle fun there.... no need to be (not saying you are necessarily) a whiny little name calling bitch about it.

(08-07-2015 02:38 PM)Banjo Wrote:  Can you do better?

Better than what?

I read more later and you had stopped making the same identical like posts. It seemed like you may have been trolling. Last night I had both good and bad moments due to personal issues.

Later I ended up having a nice chat with a guy who had been trolling us. If indeed you are not and never were a troll, I do apologise.

Sometimes it is hard to tell.

Cheers.

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Banjo's post
09-07-2015, 08:54 AM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2015 08:59 AM by WOPR.)
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Hello Banjo and Pablo....

Thank's for that, and nice to meet you
Perhaps I was a little presumptious too

Now you've apologized to me, and I apologize to you
Maybe now we can address the topic.... What's your view?

And then there's Pablo, who clearly stepped in it
But then who hasn't so.... Why should I question it?

So now that we're clear that I'm not Diablo
I'll go ahead and apologize to Pablo!

Just a little creative license there.... when they stored me away after they made the movie they left me plugged in!

Nice (so far) to meet you both.

So about WTC7, I've already reached a conclusion but I still like to read the opinions of others.... Anyone here knowledgable on the subject?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2015, 09:53 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
I don't have the in-depth knowledge of 7 that others do here, but as a former Air Force firefighter, I can tell you that any building involved in flames for hours is a collapse hazard. Debris struck the building, starting fires that burnt all day. Collapse was to be expected in the absence of successful firefighting.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2015, 10:01 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(09-07-2015 08:54 AM)WOPR Wrote:  So about WTC7, I've already reached a conclusion but I still like to read the opinions of others.... Anyone here knowledgable on the subject?

And your conclusion is? Don't be shy.

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: