9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
30-08-2015, 07:32 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(07-02-2015 01:51 PM)cjlr Wrote:  
(07-02-2015 01:03 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  (-C-) Controlled demolition conspiracy theories require that conspirators be simultaneously smart enough to pull off the most devastating terrorist attack in US history and not get caught and too stupid to pick just one reliable method.

All conspiracy theories are like that.

"There's this big, vast, conspiracy, see? And they're so amazingly powerful and connected and intelligent that they've secretly coordinated every major event in history. And only I, an uneducated fool in a basement, have the brilliant astuteness necessary to penetrate their devious web of lies..."

It's rather revealing, in that it brings out the two major reasons people believe that shit anyway: a way to ascribe agency to random events, because chance is scary and doesn't give you anyone to blame, and a way to feel superior, because you've figured out something the rest of the sheeple didn't.

And in that sense, most major religions scratch the same two itches...
I am totally stealing this, I'll give you credit but I'm stealing it brilliant concise hits the mark, serious respect to you sir.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes adey67's post
30-08-2015, 01:30 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
[Image: 3Ni2u42.jpg]

[Image: ZF1ZJ4M.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like houseofcantor's post
31-08-2015, 09:29 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Morons who think they are intelligent can come up with what they regard as insults.

It is so curious that they cannot come up with experiments to demonstrate what they claim is true in FOURTEEN YEARS. 12 days to 14th anniversary and we can't get distribution of steel data. What does steel have to do 1ith 1300 ft skyscrapers?

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2015, 09:30 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
Quote:The 9/11 plane strikes were a hologram identical to the proposed alien invasion that Bill Cooper and Henry Kissinger referred to. Nano-aluminum, strontium and barium chemtrails are being dumped by the megaton to facilitate hologram projection. The false front attack served the same purpose as the Reichstag psyop

[Image: ZF1ZJ4M.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2015, 09:54 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 09:29 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Morons who think they are intelligent can come up with what they regard as insults.

It is so curious that they cannot come up with experiments to demonstrate what they claim is true in FOURTEEN YEARS. 12 days to 14th anniversary and we can't get distribution of steel data. What does steel have to do 1ith 1300 ft skyscrapers?

psik

You think there is a problem with what you perceive is a lack of data.
There are sufficient data to support the official version of events.

Why don't you spend time on something useful? Consider

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
31-08-2015, 12:43 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 09:29 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Morons who think they are intelligent can come up with what they regard as insults.

It is so curious that they cannot come up with experiments to demonstrate what they claim is true in FOURTEEN YEARS. 12 days to 14th anniversary and we can't get distribution of steel data. What does steel have to do 1ith 1300 ft skyscrapers?

psik

Well.. the facts that one plane hit each of said buildings which, you've admitted (I think), were simply just giant tubes of steel. Thence, large fires were created inside said giant steel tubes and thence said steel tubes were seen to collapse, straight down, with the parts above the impact points being that which fell down.

I ask again, for the umpteenth time,

What is it that you psikeyhackr, think happened on said day.

Since you keep seemingly to reject the information that I've posted above.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2015, 03:05 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 09:54 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(31-08-2015 09:29 AM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Morons who think they are intelligent can come up with what they regard as insults.

It is so curious that they cannot come up with experiments to demonstrate what they claim is true in FOURTEEN YEARS. 12 days to 14th anniversary and we can't get distribution of steel data. What does steel have to do 1ith 1300 ft skyscrapers?

psik

You think there is a problem with what you perceive is a lack of data.
There are sufficient data to support the official version of events.

Why don't you spend time on something useful? Consider

You are posting here.

Your empty claims with no support are so useful. But in FOURTEEN YEARS not a single engineering school has built a physical or virtual model demonstrating the north tower collapse. The Purdue crash simulation could not even get the building deflection correct.

Debunkers can just ignore things and pretend they are irrelevant. That is what is so funny. Physics is irrelevant in the nation that put men on the Moon. Everyone is supposed to BELIEVE what they are told.

Modeling only took 4 months in 1940. Maybe some contagious germ causing stupidity was brought back from the Moon.

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-08-2015, 06:02 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 03:05 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Your empty claims with no support are so useful. But in FOURTEEN YEARS not a single engineering school has built a physical or virtual model demonstrating the north tower collapse. The Purdue crash simulation could not even get the building deflection correct.

What do you think the odds are that 16 years from now you will be typing "But in THIRTY YEARS not a single engineering school has built a physical or virtual model demonstrating the north tower collapse." You don't feel this quest is quixotic? Because everybody else does.

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like GirlyMan's post
31-08-2015, 06:19 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 03:05 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(31-08-2015 09:54 AM)Chas Wrote:  You think there is a problem with what you perceive is a lack of data.
There are sufficient data to support the official version of events.

Why don't you spend time on something useful? Consider

You are posting here.

Your empty claims with no support are so useful. But in FOURTEEN YEARS not a single engineering school has built a physical or virtual model demonstrating the north tower collapse. The Purdue crash simulation could not even get the building deflection correct.

Debunkers can just ignore things and pretend they are irrelevant. That is what is so funny. Physics is irrelevant in the nation that put men on the Moon. Everyone is supposed to BELIEVE what they are told.

Modeling only took 4 months in 1940. Maybe some contagious germ causing stupidity was brought back from the Moon.

psik

You are making the claims, therefore it is YOU who must supply the evidence.

Do you have any? No? then shut up.

You come across as a right lunatic.

Show us your evidence or piss off.

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Banjo's post
31-08-2015, 08:27 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(31-08-2015 03:05 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(31-08-2015 09:54 AM)Chas Wrote:  You think there is a problem with what you perceive is a lack of data.
There are sufficient data to support the official version of events.

Why don't you spend time on something useful? Consider

You are posting here.

Just pointing out your delusion. Drinking Beverage

Quote:Your empty claims with no support are so useful.

Empty claims? The design of the building and the amount of steel are available data. What is your problem with that?

Quote:But in FOURTEEN YEARS not a single engineering school has built a physical or virtual model demonstrating the north tower collapse. The Purdue crash simulation could not even get the building deflection correct.

A physical model is not useful. Mass vs. strength of material does not scale.
What virtual model are you looking for? The collapse has been modeled many times.

"NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.
Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.
"

Quote:Debunkers can just ignore things and pretend they are irrelevant. That is what is so funny. Physics is irrelevant in the nation that put men on the Moon. Everyone is supposed to BELIEVE what they are told.

Modeling only took 4 months in 1940.

Modeling of what?

Quote:Maybe some contagious germ causing stupidity was brought back from the Moon.

That is even more daft than your 9-11 crap.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: