9/11 EXPOSED
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 2 Votes - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
13-09-2015, 02:48 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(13-09-2015 03:35 AM)natachan Wrote:  I'm simply going by what the engineers and architects wrote down. Any loading on the horizontal beams would have been negligible. The highest point of axial stress was high, but still not outside the working limit of steel.

Horizontal members in steel frame construction do not, as a rule, take vertical loads.
Hiya fella ask him what caused the collapse I guarantee he wont answer Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2015, 03:32 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(13-09-2015 01:22 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(13-09-2015 03:35 AM)natachan Wrote:  I'm simply going by what the engineers and architects wrote down. Any loading on the horizontal beams would have been negligible. The highest point of axial stress was high, but still not outside the working limit of steel.

Horizontal members in steel frame construction do not, as a rule, take vertical loads.

So provide a link to what one of these ENGINEERS said about the horizontal beams in the core? I have not noticed much discussion of the subject.

psik

Natachan does this shit for a living. You do this shit because you are batshit insane. I'm going with natachan.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like GirlyMan's post
13-09-2015, 04:08 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
[Image: 55f58bd45dfec.jpeg]

"If you keep trying to better yourself that's enough for me. We don't decide which hand we are dealt in life, but we make the decision to play it or fold it" - Nishi Karano Kaze
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like JDog554's post
13-09-2015, 04:23 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(13-09-2015 04:08 PM)JDog554 Wrote:  [Image: 55f58bd45dfec.jpeg]

False, Crabby Patty's can't collapse vertically when titled 90% off jilter.

Scrooge McDuck did 9/11

[Image: RFA.bmp]

It was all done to create what was a tourist attraction, into a tourist attraction.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like ClydeLee's post
13-09-2015, 04:37 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(13-09-2015 04:23 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  
(13-09-2015 04:08 PM)JDog554 Wrote:  [Image: 55f58bd45dfec.jpeg]

False, Crabby Patty's can't collapse vertically when titled 90% off jilter.

Scrooge McDuck did 9/11

[Image: RFA.bmp]

It was all done to create what was a tourist attraction, into a tourist attraction.

My photographic evidence begs to differ.

[Image: Hurk+bernie+memes_df3309_5424945.jpg]

The people closely associated with the namesake of female canines are suffering from a nondescript form of lunacy.
"Anti-environmentalism is like standing in front of a forest and going 'quick kill them they're coming right for us!'" - Jake Farr-Wharton, The Imaginary Friend Show.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like Free Thought's post
14-09-2015, 05:36 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
.....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes pablo's post
14-09-2015, 05:40 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(13-09-2015 01:22 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  
(13-09-2015 03:35 AM)natachan Wrote:  I'm simply going by what the engineers and architects wrote down. Any loading on the horizontal beams would have been negligible. The highest point of axial stress was high, but still not outside the working limit of steel.

Horizontal members in steel frame construction do not, as a rule, take vertical loads.

So provide a link to what one of these ENGINEERS said about the horizontal beams in the core? I have not noticed much discussion of the subject.

psik


I cannot believe, but must, that this idiocy continues.

Everyone here thinks you are crazy, insane, to post again would only confirm it.

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-09-2015, 02:10 AM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
[Image: mlfw8237-2bd.gif]

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes EvolutionKills's post
22-09-2015, 09:12 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(14-09-2015 05:40 PM)Banjo Wrote:  
(13-09-2015 01:22 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  So provide a link to what one of these ENGINEERS said about the horizontal beams in the core? I have not noticed much discussion of the subject.

psik
I cannot believe, but must, that this idiocy continues.

Everyone here thinks you are crazy, insane, to post again would only confirm it.

What I see is that it has been two weeks and natachan has not provided a link to an "engineer" talking about the horizontal beams in the core. The length of horizontal steel in the core had to be around 2.5 times as great as the vertical steel. Curious thing for engineers to ignore for 14 years.

Talk about idiocy and insanity and can't deal with the data. Or is it the missing data?

psik
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-09-2015, 09:21 PM
RE: 9/11 EXPOSED
(22-09-2015 09:12 PM)psikeyhackr Wrote:  Talk about idiocy and insanity and can't deal with the data.

Like the clear data that shows we only use this subforum to laugh at idiots like you?

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes houseofcantor's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: