9/11 truthers "are crazy"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
25-10-2012, 05:36 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"



E 2 = (mc 2)2 + (pc )2
614C → 714N + e + ̅νe
2 K(s) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 KOH(aq) + H2 (g) + 196 kJ/mol
It works, bitches.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 05:54 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
The falling debris.
How does falling debris on one side of a building cause all the sides to collapse along with and at the same speed of the gouged side. And where are the photos and videos of these huge impacts of falling debris?

Can you city any precedence for a building collapsing in on itself due to fire?

And since when could support beams of a building be melted due to a fire in a building?

And since when does a fire in a building burn through concrete to even get to the steel?

Drinking Beverage

evil questions
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 06:21 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
(22-10-2012 05:54 AM)bemore Wrote:  
(22-10-2012 01:31 AM)Diablo Wrote:  So you think the building has to melt to fail?! ROFL!!!

Whats your expert explanation or are you just looking to mock my opinions???

If your opinion is that the steel has to melt before the building will fail, then there is no amount of mocking that could ever be done to do the world justice.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 06:28 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
(25-10-2012 06:21 PM)Diablo666 Wrote:  
(22-10-2012 05:54 AM)bemore Wrote:  Whats your expert explanation or are you just looking to mock my opinions???

If your opinion is that the steel has to melt before the building will fail, then there is no amount of mocking that could ever be done to do the world justice.

A building fell.

A building fell in on itself.

those are two very different phrases.

Building number 7 didn't just "fall". According to you guys, a fire got so hot.... then just happen to weaken the support beams on all sides to make the building fall in on itself.

If you guys state something then it is up to you provide evidence.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 06:51 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
You're an idiot.


Falling debris on top and the side of the building, setting all the contents of the building on fire. The heat of the fire weakens the steel, which softens and expands. The structure is unevenly heated and the steel superstructure warps, popping welds/rivets, until in one place the lateral supports under a floor buckle and collapse, falling down and knocking out the floor underneath and possibly several more. The vertical supports, without lateral struts to stabilize them, buckle and a whole section of the building's interior collapses in on itself. This huge void in the frame puts huge stress on other structural members causing them to collapse in a chain reaction. This took eight seconds. The interior of the building falls in on itself, leaving the outer masonry structure unsupported. The weight of the top of the masonry bearing down on it and the pressure from the collapsed interior pushing out causes the bottom few floors of the masonry exterior to collapse, causing the top 40 floors to fall at near free-fall speed, toppling to a 30 degree angle and going an unknown distance out of its footprint as it falls and significantly damaging all nearby structures.


All of this verified by video footage, engineering analysis, and simulations. All part of the conspiracy of course; we know the real answer was that the Navy Seals came in and wired the whole place with 10 billion tons of nanothermite then crashed a cruise missile shaped like a plane into it because flarglehumpgurnaglarb.

E 2 = (mc 2)2 + (pc )2
614C → 714N + e + ̅νe
2 K(s) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 KOH(aq) + H2 (g) + 196 kJ/mol
It works, bitches.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 07:04 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
(25-10-2012 06:51 PM)Phaedrus Wrote:  You're an idiot.


Falling debris on top and the side of the building, setting all the contents of the building on fire. The heat of the fire weakens the steel, which softens and expands. The structure is unevenly heated and the steel superstructure warps, popping welds/rivets, until in one place the lateral supports under a floor buckle and collapse, falling down and knocking out the floor underneath and possibly several more. The vertical supports, without lateral struts to stabilize them, buckle and a whole section of the building's interior collapses in on itself. This huge void in the frame puts huge stress on other structural members causing them to collapse in a chain reaction. This took eight seconds. The interior of the building falls in on itself, leaving the outer masonry structure unsupported. The weight of the top of the masonry bearing down on it and the pressure from the collapsed interior pushing out causes the bottom few floors of the masonry exterior to collapse, causing the top 40 floors to fall at near free-fall speed, toppling to a 30 degree angle and going an unknown distance out of its footprint as it falls and significantly damaging all nearby structures.


All of this verified by video footage, engineering analysis, and simulations. All part of the conspiracy of course; we know the real answer was that the Navy Seals came in and wired the whole place with 10 billion tons of nanothermite then crashed a cruise missile shaped like a plane into it because flarglehumpgurnaglarb.

Can you post pictures of raging fires and debris wreckage on all sides of the building?

It was nice talking to you in this thread, see you in the next one. Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 07:06 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
Yeah, right at the top of the thread, numbnuts.

E 2 = (mc 2)2 + (pc )2
614C → 714N + e + ̅νe
2 K(s) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 KOH(aq) + H2 (g) + 196 kJ/mol
It works, bitches.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 07:12 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
(25-10-2012 06:28 PM)I and I Wrote:  
(25-10-2012 06:21 PM)Diablo666 Wrote:  If your opinion is that the steel has to melt before the building will fail, then there is no amount of mocking that could ever be done to do the world justice.

A building fell.

A building fell in on itself.

those are two very different phrases.

Building number 7 didn't just "fall". According to you guys, a fire got so hot.... then just happen to weaken the support beams on all sides to make the building fall in on itself.

If you guys state something then it is up to you provide evidence.


No those are the same thing... I am talking about the main tower btw, not some subsequent building.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 07:41 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
Raging inferno eh. Im too lazy ATM to find it, but what about the vid of the woman - whom, if memory serves,they identified - standing in the entry wound of one of the towers waving a rag in distress? Sure. So raging, able to soften steel - while a woman stands there for minutes on end.

Makes perfect sense.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-10-2012, 07:43 PM
RE: 9/11 truthers "are crazy"
Don't remember any such vid.

E 2 = (mc 2)2 + (pc )2
614C → 714N + e + ̅νe
2 K(s) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 KOH(aq) + H2 (g) + 196 kJ/mol
It works, bitches.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: