A beautiful creation
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
15-03-2014, 05:41 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:39 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:38 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  Would humankind and monkey-kind be the same thing? Consider

Apekind, Teen.

~ Miss Meng

So....yes? Consider

[Image: ezgif_save_1.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:42 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:36 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  I can but first you must answer my question. It is either bacteria be the same kind or families be the same kind. You can't have both.

Keep it simple, Freethinker. We don't need those classifications. Bacteria is bacteria (a kind in itself)! Laugh out load

~ Miss Meng
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:42 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:41 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  So....yes? Consider

Apekind and Humankind are different kinds, Teen. He created them this way.

~ Miss Meng
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:43 PM
A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:36 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  I can but first you must answer my question. It is either bacteria be the same kind or families be the same kind. You can't have both.

Keep it simple, Freethinker. We don't need those classifications. Bacteria is bacteria (a kind in itself)! Laugh out load

~ Miss Meng

Is the thread getting too difficult for your troll persona to understand?

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.”
― Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:44 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:36 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  I can but first you must answer my question. It is either bacteria be the same kind or families be the same kind. You can't have both.

Keep it simple, Freethinker. We don't need those classifications. Bacteria is bacteria (a kind in itself)! Laugh out load

~ Miss Meng

Then you just shot yourself in the foot. Why you ask? Because you just said the bacteria is the same kind. So that mean eukryotes are the same kind. If we don't need taxonomy all life is the same kind.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] ♪僕は恐怖の一定した状態に住んで、不幸、逃すもう?僕は、それはもう痛いときも気づかないと
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:44 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:36 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  I can but first you must answer my question. It is either bacteria be the same kind or families be the same kind. You can't have both.

Keep it simple, Freethinker. We don't need those classifications. Bacteria is bacteria (a kind in itself)! Laugh out load

~ Miss Meng

How can an entire domain be a kind, when Felidae -- a family -- is also a kind? Do you have any idea how many phyla alone there are in the domain bacteria?

[Image: ezgif_save_1.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:45 PM
A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:39 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:38 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  Would humankind and monkey-kind be the same thing? Consider

Apekind, Teen.

~ Miss Meng

(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:41 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  So....yes? Consider

Apekind and Humankind are different kinds, Teen. He created them this way.

~ Miss Meng


You sure change your mind a lot.

“It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.”
― Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:45 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:41 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  So....yes? Consider

Apekind and Humankind are different kinds, Teen. He created them this way.

~ Miss Meng

http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/prim_8.htm

Not according to science.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] ♪僕は恐怖の一定した状態に住んで、不幸、逃すもう?僕は、それはもう痛いときも気づかないと
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:46 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:44 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  Then you just shot yourself in the foot. Why you ask? Because you just said the bacteria is the same kind. So that mean eukryotes are the same kind. If we don't need taxonomy all life is the same kind.

You are over thinking it, Freethinker. There are different kinds of animal, just as there are different kinds of plant, and different kinds of bacteria, etc.

~ Miss Meng
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-03-2014, 05:46 PM
RE: A beautiful creation
(15-03-2014 05:44 PM)Teen-skeptic-go! Wrote:  
(15-03-2014 05:42 PM)Miss Meng Wrote:  Keep it simple, Freethinker. We don't need those classifications. Bacteria is bacteria (a kind in itself)! Laugh out load

~ Miss Meng

How can an entire domain be a kind, when Felidae -- a family -- is also a kind? Do you have any idea how many phyla alone there are in the domain bacteria?

[Image: full.png]

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] ♪僕は恐怖の一定した状態に住んで、不幸、逃すもう?僕は、それはもう痛いときも気づかないと
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Metazoa Zeke's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: