America vs Britain in war...
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
04-07-2014, 08:28 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
Wow!

Thread from the Dead!

But it saves me creating a new one to wish everyone a happy Fourth of July.

The day we celebrate not have to remotely manage all those religious crazies that we didn't want anymore.

Happy 4th to all ye Mukicans over there in Little Canada.

Tongue

Oh and Globoepoch, my Vietnamese girls say "Hi"... and "1:0"

Wink

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-07-2014, 09:21 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
Who would ally with who, and what additional enemy would launch attacks on America while they are caught with their pants down?

A wise person makes their own decisions; an ignorant one follows public opinion.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Elskidor's post
04-07-2014, 10:55 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
If we assume for a moment that two close allies are insane enough to go total war on each other but not quite insane enough to go nuclear war on each other...

The US has material superiority in every way, but far from enough to do anything meaningful with it. They're certainly not capable of a trans-Atlantic amphibious assault.

What's the point of this exercise? In any case there are far too many other variables for a specific answer.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-07-2014, 08:14 PM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
The US military is all very impressive... But look what they're up against.




[img]

via GIPHY

[/img]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-07-2014, 09:59 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
Ok a lot of people commenting on this subject are not thinking logically only thinking with pride & idiocracy.

First off, a few key things matter. 1st industry, 2nd number of military machines of war, 3rd logistics.
In this Hypothetical War of 2 powerful nations separated by thousands of miles of ocean "Logistics" will matter.

Where is this war going to be fought? It's going to be fought around England Cause the U.S. is a Huge area to invade and occupy. Now on to "Numbers of Military War Machines" NOT the number of (ground Troops) or who has the Best Trained military personnel. If you think your country has the Best Trained military than your a Fool. That's just pride in your country's military! You always have to assume your enemy is better trained. Bad things happen when you start thinking of another people as lower and not as smart as you.

The U.S. hase over 2X the Naval War ships than Britain has at this time. (That's GoingTo Matter) Aircraft Carriers, Destroiers, subs ext. The U.S. Hase more than 5X the military aircraft than Britain dose. That a FACT not a assumption! The U.S. Is Very Very well at "Logistics" getting it's military anywhere around the world in 72 hours and keeping them supplied. That's What they do and hase been proven for over 7O years. Britain can do the Same as well. Now in this War the U.S. Will attempt to surround England & launch bombing raids over key military positions. Britain will no doubt defend its air space with devastating defenses that will destroy many US aircraft.

Now a history lesson. In WW2 Hitler almost succeeded in starving Britain into submission. It wasn't from the bombings it was from a little sub called the U-boat. Britain would have fail if it wasn't for the supply lines from the US. His U boats sank Thousands of allied merchant ships killed Thousands of sailors & Thousands of tons of cargo was lost supplying Britain to keep them in the fight before the US ever entered the War. That's not a knock on Britain it's simply a fact of history.

So the. US will Blockade the waters around Britain and many ships on both sides will be lost. Now "Industry" No other country in the world can compete with Americas Industrial Might except China. With the loss of many Ships & Aircraft the US can pump out more ships Plans ext faster than Britain can. With the Blockade Britain will slowly run short of supplies further slowing there factorys ability to replenish their losses. It will take time, but the US will Win the war against Britain.

It all comes down to how many forces you can bring to bare and keep them coming. The US is capable of this and England's Allies are Americas Allies & they DO NOT want a War with the US so they will stay out of it.

Just think of Britain's islands as a Castle or a Fortress. The Best way to take one is to starve them out and wear them down so they can't resupply there losses and than invade. That's when (Ground Troops) and numbers will count. Many of Britain's ground forces will die in the Missile and bombing strikes. US Ground Troops will be fresh and many more of them cause of Draft that will take place in America.

Nukes Will NOT be used by America. Britain may use there's as a last resort, but probably not. Cause the U.S will use there's and All of England's citizens will be Dead.

THE END!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-07-2014, 10:11 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
(11-07-2014 09:59 AM)saleen37804 Wrote:  Ok a lot of people commenting on this subject are not thinking logically only thinking with pride & idiocracy.

First off, a few key things matter. 1st industry, 2nd number of military machines of war, 3rd logistics.
In this Hypothetical War of 2 powerful nations separated by thousands of miles of ocean "Logistics" will matter.

Where is this war going to be fought? It's going to be fought around England Cause the U.S. is a Huge area to invade and occupy. Now on to "Numbers of Military War Machines" NOT the number of (ground Troops) or who has the Best Trained military personnel. If you think your country has the Best Trained military than your a Fool. That's just pride in your country's military! You always have to assume your enemy is better trained. Bad things happen when you start thinking of another people as lower and not as smart as you.

The U.S. hase over 2X the Naval War ships than Britain has at this time. (That's GoingTo Matter) Aircraft Carriers, Destroiers, subs ext. The U.S. Hase more than 5X the military aircraft than Britain dose. That a FACT not a assumption! The U.S. Is Very Very well at "Logistics" getting it's military anywhere around the world in 72 hours and keeping them supplied. That's What they do and hase been proven for over 7O years. Britain can do the Same as well. Now in this War the U.S. Will attempt to surround England & launch bombing raids over key military positions. Britain will no doubt defend its air space with devastating defenses that will destroy many US aircraft.

Now a history lesson. In WW2 Hitler almost succeeded in starving Britain into submission. It wasn't from the bombings it was from a little sub called the U-boat. Britain would have fail if it wasn't for the supply lines from the US. His U boats sank Thousands of allied merchant ships killed Thousands of sailors & Thousands of tons of cargo was lost supplying Britain to keep them in the fight before the US ever entered the War. That's not a knock on Britain it's simply a fact of history.

So the. US will Blockade the waters around Britain and many ships on both sides will be lost. Now "Industry" No other country in the world can compete with Americas Industrial Might except China. With the loss of many Ships & Aircraft the US can pump out more ships Plans ext faster than Britain can. With the Blockade Britain will slowly run short of supplies further slowing there factorys ability to replenish their losses. It will take time, but the US will Win the war against Britain.

It all comes down to how many forces you can bring to bare and keep them coming. The US is capable of this and England's Allies are Americas Allies & they DO NOT want a War with the US so they will stay out of it.

Just think of Britain's islands as a Castle or a Fortress. The Best way to take one is to starve them out and wear them down so they can't resupply there losses and than invade. That's when (Ground Troops) and numbers will count. Many of Britain's ground forces will die in the Missile and bombing strikes. US Ground Troops will be fresh and many more of them cause of Draft that will take place in America.

Nukes Will NOT be used by America. Britain may use there's as a last resort, but probably not. Cause the U.S will use there's and All of England's citizens will be Dead.

THE END!

I had to disregard your post as in your summation you forgot to mention the citizens of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and other parts of the UK...


"Name me a moral statement made or moral action performed that could not have been made or done, by a non-believer..." - Christopher Hitchens



My youtube musings: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfFoxbz...UVi1pf4B5g
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like CiderThinker's post
11-07-2014, 10:20 AM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
(11-07-2014 10:11 AM)CiderThinker Wrote:  
(11-07-2014 09:59 AM)saleen37804 Wrote:  Ok a lot of people commenting on this subject are not thinking logically only thinking with pride & idiocracy.

First off, a few key things matter. 1st industry, 2nd number of military machines of war, 3rd logistics.
In this Hypothetical War of 2 powerful nations separated by thousands of miles of ocean "Logistics" will matter.

Where is this war going to be fought? It's going to be fought around England Cause the U.S. is a Huge area to invade and occupy. Now on to "Numbers of Military War Machines" NOT the number of (ground Troops) or who has the Best Trained military personnel. If you think your country has the Best Trained military than your a Fool. That's just pride in your country's military! You always have to assume your enemy is better trained. Bad things happen when you start thinking of another people as lower and not as smart as you.

The U.S. hase over 2X the Naval War ships than Britain has at this time. (That's GoingTo Matter) Aircraft Carriers, Destroiers, subs ext. The U.S. Hase more than 5X the military aircraft than Britain dose. That a FACT not a assumption! The U.S. Is Very Very well at "Logistics" getting it's military anywhere around the world in 72 hours and keeping them supplied. That's What they do and hase been proven for over 7O years. Britain can do the Same as well. Now in this War the U.S. Will attempt to surround England & launch bombing raids over key military positions. Britain will no doubt defend its air space with devastating defenses that will destroy many US aircraft.

Now a history lesson. In WW2 Hitler almost succeeded in starving Britain into submission. It wasn't from the bombings it was from a little sub called the U-boat. Britain would have fail if it wasn't for the supply lines from the US. His U boats sank Thousands of allied merchant ships killed Thousands of sailors & Thousands of tons of cargo was lost supplying Britain to keep them in the fight before the US ever entered the War. That's not a knock on Britain it's simply a fact of history.

So the. US will Blockade the waters around Britain and many ships on both sides will be lost. Now "Industry" No other country in the world can compete with Americas Industrial Might except China. With the loss of many Ships & Aircraft the US can pump out more ships Plans ext faster than Britain can. With the Blockade Britain will slowly run short of supplies further slowing there factorys ability to replenish their losses. It will take time, but the US will Win the war against Britain.

It all comes down to how many forces you can bring to bare and keep them coming. The US is capable of this and England's Allies are Americas Allies & they DO NOT want a War with the US so they will stay out of it.

Just think of Britain's islands as a Castle or a Fortress. The Best way to take one is to starve them out and wear them down so they can't resupply there losses and than invade. That's when (Ground Troops) and numbers will count. Many of Britain's ground forces will die in the Missile and bombing strikes. US Ground Troops will be fresh and many more of them cause of Draft that will take place in America.

Nukes Will NOT be used by America. Britain may use there's as a last resort, but probably not. Cause the U.S will use there's and All of England's citizens will be Dead.

THE END!

I had to disregard your post as in your summation you forgot to mention the citizens of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and other parts of the UK...

You're right given this opportunity they would leave England holding the bag and laugh and laugh.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-07-2014, 12:45 PM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
I tend to think the Yanks could take the world if the wanted. I certainly don't think any one country could stand against them but I could be wrong.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-07-2014, 01:31 PM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
(11-07-2014 09:59 AM)saleen37804 Wrote:  Ok a lot of people commenting on this subject are not thinking logically only thinking with pride & idiocracy.

First off, a few key things matter. 1st industry, 2nd number of military machines of war, 3rd logistics.
In this Hypothetical War of 2 powerful nations separated by thousands of miles of ocean "Logistics" will matter.

Where is this war going to be fought? It's going to be fought around England Cause the U.S. is a Huge area to invade and occupy. Now on to "Numbers of Military War Machines" NOT the number of (ground Troops) or who has the Best Trained military personnel. If you think your country has the Best Trained military than your a Fool. That's just pride in your country's military! You always have to assume your enemy is better trained. Bad things happen when you start thinking of another people as lower and not as smart as you.

The U.S. hase over 2X the Naval War ships than Britain has at this time. (That's GoingTo Matter) Aircraft Carriers, Destroiers, subs ext. The U.S. Hase more than 5X the military aircraft than Britain dose. That a FACT not a assumption! The U.S. Is Very Very well at "Logistics" getting it's military anywhere around the world in 72 hours and keeping them supplied. That's What they do and hase been proven for over 7O years. Britain can do the Same as well. Now in this War the U.S. Will attempt to surround England & launch bombing raids over key military positions. Britain will no doubt defend its air space with devastating defenses that will destroy many US aircraft.

Now a history lesson. In WW2 Hitler almost succeeded in starving Britain into submission. It wasn't from the bombings it was from a little sub called the U-boat. Britain would have fail if it wasn't for the supply lines from the US. His U boats sank Thousands of allied merchant ships killed Thousands of sailors & Thousands of tons of cargo was lost supplying Britain to keep them in the fight before the US ever entered the War. That's not a knock on Britain it's simply a fact of history.

So the. US will Blockade the waters around Britain and many ships on both sides will be lost. Now "Industry" No other country in the world can compete with Americas Industrial Might except China. With the loss of many Ships & Aircraft the US can pump out more ships Plans ext faster than Britain can. With the Blockade Britain will slowly run short of supplies further slowing there factorys ability to replenish their losses. It will take time, but the US will Win the war against Britain.

It all comes down to how many forces you can bring to bare and keep them coming. The US is capable of this and England's Allies are Americas Allies & they DO NOT want a War with the US so they will stay out of it.

Just think of Britain's islands as a Castle or a Fortress. The Best way to take one is to starve them out and wear them down so they can't resupply there losses and than invade. That's when (Ground Troops) and numbers will count. Many of Britain's ground forces will die in the Missile and bombing strikes. US Ground Troops will be fresh and many more of them cause of Draft that will take place in America.

Nukes Will NOT be used by America. Britain may use there's as a last resort, but probably not. Cause the U.S will use there's and All of England's citizens will be Dead.

THE END!

That's all meaningless. Any conflict wouldn't happen in a vacuum.

Without logistical support the Americans can't mount a trans-Atlantic invasion. Nor could they blockade the Channel. And the UK hasn't a hope of mounting any offensive at all.

Whatever the scenario it's going to take alien space bat mind control to set up.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes cjlr's post
11-07-2014, 01:51 PM
RE: America vs Britain in war...
Is this guy serious.... Your showing your an idiot. America can do the logistics of a Trans Atlantic Supply line for a War effort. I said they did it in WW2 almost 80 years ago so it wouldn't be a problem today. And they have been fighting a War on the other side of the world for over a decade.

You really shouldn't post on here anymore, your embarrassing yourself!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: