An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
20-12-2016, 01:02 PM (This post was last modified: 21-12-2016 09:48 AM by theBorg.)
Bug An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
Look, here is YECreationism peer-reviewed paper in very elite Biology journal:

Stephen C. Meyer, "Intelligent Design: The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories", Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington (volume 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239).

the abstract and comments in
http://www.discovery.org/a/2177

So, the Science does not forbid you to become the True Christians. However, you will not be paid, if you open your mouth. Laugh out load Laugh out load Laugh out load

See in the film below how hurt the martyrs are, namely the Meyers and his helpers (the editor of the paper).
How no martyrs??? Is it all photoshop??? Let me open your glued together eyes. 1) anybody can read here "Biologists criticized Sternberg, because it supported ID." Biologists are persecutors of ID. Correct? 2) Experts are all Darwinist-s with agenda to kiss the ass of satan(ism), so the editor is hero. 3) He is very sad and hurt to "didn't lose his editorship", just watch his martyr's face again.

Deluded Sinner: "The magazine withdrew it with an apology." So, there is no YEC paper in the "Proceedings ..... of Washington"? The published paper is deleted???? It is surely a crime against all what is holy. Damn anti-theism.

Laugh out load Laugh out load

So, currently there is no single Creationist in the "Current Content" indexing publication system? No, it seems. The problem goes deeper: any clear and wise paper (on any subject, not only about the Theology), any fatal critique of the Current Content papers (they call it "Comment on: ....") is being rejected. Any paper of non-PhD is being rejected. The Current Content journals are totally in the Scientism - the false paganic religion.

:-( Laugh out load

Thank you for taking the side of the Dr. Meyer to fight against theBorg. But the humans, if they are not the saints, are partly satanists and partly saints. Thus, any personal stuff (the Meyer has posted on his website) is questionable. But the Current Content indexing system has the authority from the Jesus Christ. The rulers of the world, the institutions and the politics of the world are under the closest look of the Jesus Christ. Therefore, the Meyers personal works are not in compar-ency with the journal, which has sinfully changed its mind.

:-)



Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 01:07 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
If you're asking "if you believe in Creationism, is there risk of censure," then the answer is obviously "yes." It's not because of exclusiveness but rather ridiculousness. 99.9% of "Creationist theories" have been repeatedly proven to be bumpkis.

Dude, Motherfuckers laughed at Peter Higgs. If there's truth, the truth will out. Problem is, Creationism is 100% fucking wrong.

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 7 users Like houseofcantor's post
20-12-2016, 01:12 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:07 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  If you're asking "if you believe in Creationism, is there risk of censure," then the answer is obviously "yes." It's not because of exclusiveness but rather ridiculousness. 99.9% of "Creationist theories" have been repeatedly proven to be bumpkis.

Dude, Censored laughed at Peter Higgs. If there's truth, the truth will out. Problem is, Creationism is 100% Censored wrong.

A comment with f-words is wrong with 100%. You are human, not satan. So, use the political correct language.

Yes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:12 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(20-12-2016 01:07 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  If you're asking "if you believe in Creationism, is there risk of censure," then the answer is obviously "yes." It's not because of exclusiveness but rather ridiculousness. 99.9% of "Creationist theories" have been repeatedly proven to be bumpkis.

Dude, Censored laughed at Peter Higgs. If there's truth, the truth will out. Problem is, Creationism is 100% Censored wrong.

A comment with f-words is wrong with 100%. You are human, not satan. So, use the political correct language.

Yes

My dick, eat it.

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 9 users Like houseofcantor's post
20-12-2016, 01:27 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:14 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  
(20-12-2016 01:12 PM)theBorg Wrote:  A comment with f-words is wrong with 100%. You are human, not satan. So, use the political correct language.

Yes

My dick, eat it.

I am not your sex-organ. I am sorry.
Please see the video in the thread, I have just added it. And repent, my friends, repent, my brothers. Stop being on the false side of atheism!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 01:31 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
At this point you're just wasting forum bandwidth. How much spamming is allowed until they ban your sorry ass?

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 01:33 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:31 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  At this point you're just wasting forum bandwidth. How much spamming is allowed until they ban your sorry ass?

He's only here to get us to talk to each other. Tongue

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like houseofcantor's post
20-12-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:31 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  At this point you're just wasting forum bandwidth. How much spamming is allowed until they ban your sorry ass?

you will kiss my Censored in Heaven.

Laugh out load
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 01:36 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
(20-12-2016 01:33 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  
(20-12-2016 01:31 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  At this point you're just wasting forum bandwidth. How much spamming is allowed until they ban your sorry ass?

He's only here to get us to talk to each other. Tongue

Contravention is futile, anyway. Dodgy

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-12-2016, 03:35 PM
RE: An elitest YEC paper found! Is it real or fantasy?
Didn't RocketSurgeon just school you on the other thread about this Meyer shit?

I'll repost his post in this thread:

(20-12-2016 02:08 PM)RocketSurgeon76 Wrote:  
(20-12-2016 12:21 PM)theBorg Wrote:  It is not for you to judge, friends. Look, here is YECreationism peer-reviewed paper in very elite Biology journal:

Stephen C. Meyer, "Intelligent Design: The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories", Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington (volume 117, no. 2, pp. 213-239).

the abstract and comments in
http://www.discovery.org/a/2177

So, the Science does not forbid you to become the True Christians. However, you will not be paid, if you open your mouth. Laugh out load Laugh out load Laugh out load

The guy who "approved" that article for publication was a volunteer for the organization who was a Creationist, and basically broke the rules of the organization (on how papers are reviewed) to give personal approval for the paper to be published, instead of going before a board of experts.

Further, it wasn't a scientific paper:

On 4 August 2004, an article by Stephen C. Meyer (Director of Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture) titled "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories", appeared in the peer-reviewed journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. Meyer's article was a literature review article, and contained no new primary scholarship itself on the topic of intelligent design. The following month, the publisher of the journal, the Council of the Biological Society of Washington, released a statement repudiating the article and stating that their former editor Richard M. Sternberg had, in an unusual manner, handled the entire review process without consultation or review from an associate editor.

(Bold emphasis my own.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sternberg_...ontroversy

The magazine withdrew it with an apology. Though Sternberg claims he was fired for what he did, the organization showed he had tendered his resignation six months prior (from his volunteer position), and was set to leave in 2 weeks... which he did. So he told another lie.

Basically, it was just another Liar For Jesus™, who was (wait for it...) lying. It has been lambasted as a terrible paper, even for a "review" paper, from a scientific point of view, as well.

I would like to take this opportunity to remind you...

LYING FOR JESUS IS STILL LYING

You posted this after you knew that it was a lie, go fuck yourself troll!

[Image: 65c9d9f9c73a16d0ed917cd6ca9063a8e633049b...9947b5.jpg]

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes TheInquisition's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: