Angry about FGM
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
04-08-2012, 07:02 PM (This post was last modified: 04-08-2012 07:07 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: Angry about FGM
(23-07-2012 04:02 PM)Red Celt Wrote:  Male circumcision is bad. Female circumcision is horrific.

The effect of circumcision is the densensitization of the genitalia. In females this is obviously horrific since some not insignificant percentage of them have trouble experiencing orgasm in the first place. Not so much for men. For men the difference between uncircumcised and circumcised is the difference between spooging in 10 seconds vs. 10 minutes. That's why I think removing my foreskin at birth was a woman's idea.

And before you fuckers start hammering me, it's a fucking joke you humorless fucks.

This is not my signature.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
04-08-2012, 07:12 PM
RE: Angry about FGM
(04-08-2012 07:02 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  ... 10 seconds vs. 10 minutes. That's why I think removing my foreskin at birth was a woman's idea.

Well, when it's a win/win situation, we do what we can.... for posterity, doncha know. Thumbsup

I think in the end, I just feel like I'm a secular person who has a skeptical eye toward any extraordinary claim, carefully examining any extraordinary evidence before jumping to conclusions. ~ Eric ~ My friend ... who figured it out.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes kim's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: