Post Reply
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
07-02-2013, 04:42 AM
RE: Apologist
I got it.

The abolitionist wouldn't be an apologist but the slaveowner would be.

Chances are the abolitionist probably wouldn't need to resort to any sort of contentious opinion - in fact, it would probably hurt the defense of their position even more to do so.

The slaveholder, on the other hand would be the apologist and would do what ever is necessary to defend his position including becoming the devil's advocate.

FUCK. I knew there was a point to what I was originally saying... I just couldn't get to it. What a retard. Dodgy

I'm going back and make an edit note before I go into a coma. Sleepy

A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like kim's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: