Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-07-2014, 02:04 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 01:56 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 01:47 AM)Lightvader Wrote:  True, but you not pointing out an accurate definition, or the post in wich you did



*you're

*which

What exactly are you claiming is an "accurate definition™"? HoboLaughat



Really. Give it up while you're behind, Chihuahua.


[Image: 119-300x200.jpg]

Don't make fun of Lightvader's spelling, its part of his charm!

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Atothetheist's post
08-07-2014, 02:11 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 02:04 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 01:56 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  *you're

*which

What exactly are you claiming is an "accurate definition™"? HoboLaughat



Really. Give it up while you're behind, Chihuahua.


[Image: 119-300x200.jpg]

Don't make fun of Lightvader's spelling, its part of his charm!

LOL if you say so....

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 02:22 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 02:04 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 01:56 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  *you're

*which

What exactly are you claiming is an "accurate definition™"? HoboLaughat



Really. Give it up while you're behind, Chihuahua.


[Image: 119-300x200.jpg]

Don't make fun of Lightvader's spelling, its part of his charm!

He does better than some people that english is their first language. Not bad on an old cell phone in a banana republic.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 02:22 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 12:42 AM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 12:35 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  LOL

Don't make the mistake of confusing brutal frankness with anger.

Feel me baby, I'm as calm as a cucumber. Tongue

...You might need to hold on with both hands...

[Image: 20121107-IMG_0144.jpg]




Tongue

Rhincodon typus, the largest extant shark. They are gentle filter feeders. They are also ovoviviparous meaning that eggs hatch in the mother.

Magnificent creatures. If I ever get to swim with sharks, these would be the ones I would chose (run-of-the-mill maneaters are so blase'....).

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 02:23 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 02:22 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 02:04 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  Don't make fun of Lightvader's spelling, its part of his charm!

He does better than some people that english is their first language. Not bad on an old cell phone in a banana republic.

I personally find it to be endearing myself. I've learned to love it in my own way.

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 04:52 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 02:23 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 02:22 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  He does better than some people that english is their first language. Not bad on an old cell phone in a banana republic.

I personally find it to be endearing myself. I've learned to love it in my own way.

Has it crossed you mind that he might be able to spell perfectly well and could be just trolling you?

Yes

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like DLJ's post
08-07-2014, 07:49 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(07-07-2014 11:51 PM)Lightvader Wrote:  Hughsie, how does the FT identify "Anyone who comes here with the sole intent of causing chaos and conflict "
is there any specific criteria that one must meet to be seen as "Anyone who comes here with the sole intent of causing chaos and conflict"?
What if one's intentions are to share his/her worldview AND to cause chaos and conflict?
Wich means you can't ban him, because causing conflict and chaos must be his SOLE intent.
Or what about someone whose main intention is to share the worldview, and the disuption is just a bonus?

The first example can still be banned because you also said "being intentionally overly disruptive is also not acceptable"

from what point is one "overly disruptive"?

Rule 5 is just window dressing. They don't take it seriously. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
08-07-2014, 08:01 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
Is the op talking about people who overuse ad hominem attacks on this forum specifically, or is this just a place to discuss the phenomenon in general? Consider

THIS USER IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. THANK YOU, AND HAVE A GREAT DAY! http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...a-few-days
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 08:17 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 08:01 AM)Cephalotus Wrote:  Is the op talking about people who overuse ad hominem attacks on this forum specifically, or is this just a place to discuss the phenomenon in general? Consider

It was meant in general, but it morphed into something else.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-07-2014, 09:35 AM
RE: Are ad hominem queens the new drama queens?
(08-07-2014 01:56 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(08-07-2014 01:47 AM)Lightvader Wrote:  True, but you not pointing out an accurate definition, or the post in wich you did isn't making you any less stupid. Drinking Beverage



*you're

*which

What exactly are you claiming is an "accurate definition™"? HoboLaughat



Really. Give it up while you're behind, Chihuahua.


[Image: 119-300x200.jpg]

you* While my spelling can be wrong at times, my grammar is much better. Drinking Beverage
And what i mean by an accurate definition of "troll", which i would like to see trademarked, but will probably never happen, is a definition wich gives the least false negatives and positives when you apply this definitions to posters, and could be used in a rule which allows us to ban trolls, without the need for a long debate on wether one is a troll or not.

I don't really like going outside.
It's too damn "peopley" out there....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: