Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
31-03-2014, 12:05 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
Impulse, the thread already exists, we just want it 18+, thats all.

If bullshit were music some people would be a brass band.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-03-2014, 12:09 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
Is it this hard to understand?
The same rules,only an age limitation. I do not see how this could lead to more trouble.
The no porn rule kinda dissapears when you set the age requirement,but they still want that rule just to be careful.

-no pr0n\
. . . . . . . .unless via PM
-no pics /
-age requirement
-sexy banter
-sexy pi&s

I don't really like going outside.
It's too damn "peopley" out there....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Lightvader's post
31-03-2014, 12:09 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:03 PM)Anjele Wrote:  I had suggested in an earlier post, that probably wasn't read by anyone other than Stark and chas...that it be a legal aged, known members thread or subforum. Known members so that trolls and socks wouldn't be allowed to dive right in. It often takes a little while to catch on to socks so it makes sense to not have the area open to every newcomer.

As for porn...videos, pictures, etc....forum rules apply. I am fairly sure that those who want porn know exactly where to find it outside of this forum. Not to mention that everyone here has email and other ways to pass around pictures and videos.

What is being asked for is a place where adults can talk with other adults without wondering if the kids can hear. This could also have the benefit of being a place to move to when other threads get a bit iffy as to age-appropriateness.

It ain't that difficult. Facepalm

We read it and I think most everyone is in agreement with this Big Grin
Whether or not it will happen...I've got my fingers crossed.

This thread is badly titled I will admit. I'm sorry Weeping
We need a section for adults only to dicuss adult issues. No porn. I'm not asking for porn. I don't want porn. The internet is full of porn we don't need more. That's not what this is even about and I think my title gives the wrong impression but even reading my first post should have been enough to convey what I wanted. I am glad you get it haha

Swing with me a while, we can listen to the birds call, we can keep each other warm.
Swing with me forever, we can count up every flower, we can weather every storm.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Losty's post
31-03-2014, 12:15 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:09 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  
(31-03-2014 12:03 PM)Anjele Wrote:  I had suggested in an earlier post, that probably wasn't read by anyone other than Stark and chas...that it be a legal aged, known members thread or subforum. Known members so that trolls and socks wouldn't be allowed to dive right in. It often takes a little while to catch on to socks so it makes sense to not have the area open to every newcomer.

As for porn...videos, pictures, etc....forum rules apply. I am fairly sure that those who want porn know exactly where to find it outside of this forum. Not to mention that everyone here has email and other ways to pass around pictures and videos.

What is being asked for is a place where adults can talk with other adults without wondering if the kids can hear. This could also have the benefit of being a place to move to when other threads get a bit iffy as to age-appropriateness.

It ain't that difficult. Facepalm

We read it and I think most everyone is in agreement with this Big Grin
Whether or not it will happen...I've got my fingers crossed.

This thread is badly titled I will admit. I'm sorry Weeping
We need a section for adults only to dicuss adult issues. No porn. I'm not asking for porn. I don't want porn. The internet is full of porn we don't need more. That's not what this is even about and I think my title gives the wrong impression but even reading my first post should have been enough to convey what I wanted. I am glad you get it haha

Don't blame yourself for the fights others started here, you didn't do anything bad.

[Image: 20cad83ad8d757191e2878b0f4bf05a9.png]
"Don't answer that. A rhetorical question."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes ELK12695's post
31-03-2014, 12:18 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
All right, I've been PMing Seth.

Here's the deal... if this is going to fly, Seth wants some ground rules and they need to be followed.

1) No porn
2) No nudity
3) No intentional erotica
4) Age verification
5) (mainly for the FT) The intentions of this forum are clearly identified in the heading. Seth doesn't want new members or casual members to get the wrong idea about it aka having a "porn" section.

This is as good as it's going to get. I think this is a fair compromise for both sides of the coin.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like kingschosen's post
31-03-2014, 12:20 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:18 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  All right, I've been PMing Seth.

Here's the deal... if this is going to fly, Seth wants some ground rules and they need to be followed.

1) No porn
2) No nudity
3) No intentional erotic
4) Age verification
5) (mainly for the FT) The intentions of this forum are clearly identified in the heading. Seth doesn't want new members or casual members to get the wrong idea about it aka having a "porn" section.

This is as good as it's going to get. I think this is a fair compromise for both sides of the coin.

That is basically what was asked for so sounds great.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Revenant77x's post
31-03-2014, 12:21 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:18 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  All right, I've been PMing Seth.

Here's the deal... if this is going to fly, Seth wants some ground rules and they need to be followed.

1) No porn
2) No nudity
3) No intentional erotic
4) Age verification
5) (mainly for the FT) The intentions of this forum are clearly identified in the heading. Seth doesn't want new members or casual members to get the wrong idea about it aka having a "porn" section.

This is as good as it's going to get. I think this is a fair compromise for both sides of the coin.

It's not even a compromise. It's exactly what I wanted. Big Grin

Swing with me a while, we can listen to the birds call, we can keep each other warm.
Swing with me forever, we can count up every flower, we can weather every storm.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Losty's post
31-03-2014, 12:21 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:20 PM)Revenant77x Wrote:  
(31-03-2014 12:18 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  All right, I've been PMing Seth.

Here's the deal... if this is going to fly, Seth wants some ground rules and they need to be followed.

1) No porn
2) No nudity
3) No intentional erotic
4) Age verification
5) (mainly for the FT) The intentions of this forum are clearly identified in the heading. Seth doesn't want new members or casual members to get the wrong idea about it aka having a "porn" section.

This is as good as it's going to get. I think this is a fair compromise for both sides of the coin.

That is basically what was asked for so sounds great.




[Image: 20cad83ad8d757191e2878b0f4bf05a9.png]
"Don't answer that. A rhetorical question."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes ELK12695's post
31-03-2014, 12:22 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
I get what the definition of porn is. Really I do. You guys are missing my point (probably because I'm delivering it poorly) so I'll try again.

We are not avoiding legal ramifications here. If we want to do that, just add a "click if you're 18+" button to enter the adult forum section. What we want to avoid is the hassle involved with people deciding THEY think something is porn. Then there's a bunch of shit to muddle through. Sure you can link to as many definitions as you want, but that doesn't mean "sexy banter" won't be pointed at as porn by someone.

We are a community. We can police ourselves. We can let members know that nude pictures are frowned upon in the adult section. But making a rule about it causes a blurry line where we most need a clear one.

So many cats, so few good recipes.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-03-2014, 12:25 PM
RE: Area69 for Adults(and Gwyneth lovers) only
(31-03-2014 12:22 PM)Stark Raving Wrote:  I get what the definition of porn is. Really I do. You guys are missing my point (probably because I'm delivering it poorly) so I'll try again.

We are not avoiding legal ramifications here. If we want to do that, just add a "click if you're 18+" button to enter the adult forum section. What we want to avoid is the hassle involved with people deciding THEY think something is porn. Then there's a bunch of shit to muddle through. Sure you can link to as many definitions as you want, but that doesn't mean "sexy banter" won't be pointed at as porn by someone.

We are a community. We can police ourselves. We can let members know that nude pictures are frowned upon in the adult section. But making a rule about it causes a blurry line where we most need a clear one.

Nope my reading comprehension is at level 0 today.
This cannot be what you are saying:
Nude pictures frowned upon=clear line
Nude pictures not allowed=blurry line???

No that cannot be what you're saying so I just don't understand I think.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: