Argument for God
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
02-04-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Argument for God
I'd like to do this in the Socratic method. I think it works better. If you just lay out an argument, atheists just say, "Nope!" and stick their heads back in the sand. Doing it this way is better. Less intimidating. And if I'm asking the questions and you're giving the answers then you can't very well escape with "prove it" can you?

So, would you agree that a thing either exists or does not exist? Consider
Quote this message in a reply
02-04-2013, 02:15 PM
RE: Argument for God
Yes and no...

Next.

See here they are, the bruises, some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Anjele's post
02-04-2013, 02:18 PM
RE: Argument for God
I suppose in the strict material sense, probably so.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-04-2013, 02:18 PM (This post was last modified: 04-04-2013 06:38 PM by Doctor X.)
RE: Argument for God
******

Those who administer and moderate in order to exercise personal agenda merely feed into the negative stereotype of Atheism
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Doctor X's post
02-04-2013, 02:19 PM
RE: Argument for God
Is a concept a thing? A concept about a thing (i.e. Unicorns) can exist, but that does not mean the actual thing exists.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of Calvinism is that good Atheists do nothing." ~Eric Oh My
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 8 users Like Erxomai's post
02-04-2013, 02:27 PM
RE: Argument for God
Argue with Egor?
Hit thumb with hammer?
Hmmn... difficult choice. Consider

[Image: 10339580_583235681775606_5139032440228868471_n.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 8 users Like houseofcantor's post
02-04-2013, 02:47 PM
 
RE: Argument for God
(02-04-2013 02:15 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Yes and no...

Next.

I need to use you for an example: You are disqualified from this discussion.

You will not argue in good faith, which makes you an intellectual coward. If that's not it, then you apparently can't tell the difference between something existing or not existing, in which case you're out of your mind and again, disqualified. Also you reveal that you haven't even thought about your atheism, which means your point of view isn't worth considering.

Feel free to stick around and be atheistic background noise. That seems to be what you're good at anyway. Dodgy
Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Egor's post
02-04-2013, 02:52 PM
 
RE: Argument for God
(02-04-2013 02:18 PM)DeavonReye Wrote:  I suppose in the strict material sense, probably so.

Let me know when you come up with a decision you feel sure about.

(02-04-2013 02:18 PM)Doctor X Wrote:  Atheists analyze it.

Unhappy with the analysis but unable to defend it, you cry and run away after a particularly mundane tantrum.

Thus it ever has been, son.

Now . . . about those . . . Choices . . . that child you are ignoring cannot hold on forever.

--J.D.

Mentally ill response as usual. You can be ignored from here on out.


(02-04-2013 02:27 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  Argue with Egor?
Hit thumb with hammer?
Hmmn... difficult choice. Consider

Background noise.
Quote this message in a reply
02-04-2013, 02:54 PM
RE: Argument for God
I may not look sure, but as far as I know, it is probably the case [as I stated in my first post on this thread].
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-04-2013, 02:55 PM
RE: Argument for God
I don't know for sure, what I do know that I can either perceive it, or I cannot perceive it.

[Image: dobie.png]

Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: