Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
23-02-2017, 07:17 PM
Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
Arizona Senate votes to seize assets of those who plan, participate in protests that turn violent

Quote:Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.
SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.

But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.

Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.

“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’

Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

But Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, said that chilling effect is aimed at a very specific group of protesters.

“You now have a situation where you have full-time, almost professional agent-provocateurs that attempt to create public disorder,’’ he said.

“A lot of them are ideologues, some of them are anarchists,’’ Kavanagh continued. “But this stuff is all planned.’’

There’s something else: By including rioting in racketeering laws, it actually permits police to arrest those who are planning events. And Kavanagh, a former police officer, said if there are organized groups, “I should certainly hope that our law enforcement people have some undercover people there.’’

“Wouldn’t you rather stop a riot before it starts?’’ Kavanagh asked colleagues during debate. “Do you really want to wait until people are injuring each other, throwing Molotov cocktails, picking up barricades and smashing them through businesses in downtown Phoenix?’’

Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, said the new criminal laws are necessary.
“I have been heartsick with what’s been going on in our country, what young people are being encouraged to do,’’ she said.

She agreed with Quezada that there already are laws that cover overt acts. But Allen said they don’t work.

“If they get thrown in jail, somebody pays to get them out,’’ she said. “There has to be something to deter them from that.’’

Farley, however, said the legislation does far more than simply going after those who might incite people to riot, something which actually already is a crime. And he warned Republicans that such a broad law could end up being used against some of their allies.

For example, he said, a “Tea Party’’ group wanting to protest a property tax hike might get permits, publicize the event and have a peaceful demonstration.
“And one person, possibly from the other side, starts breaking the windows of a car,’’ Farley said.

“And all of a sudden the organizers of that march, the local Tea Party, are going to be under indictment from the county attorney in the county that raised those property taxes,’’ he said. “That will have a chilling effect on anybody, right or left, who wants to protest something the government has done.’’

Sen. Katie Hobbs, D-Phoenix, said the whole legislation is based on a false premise of how disturbances happen.

“This idea that people are being paid to come out and do that?’’ she said. “I’m sorry, but I think that is fake news.’’

Sen. Andrea Dalessandro, D-Green Valley, had her own concerns.
“I’m fearful that ‘riot’ is in the eyes of the beholder and that this bill will apply more strictly to minorities and people trying to have their voice heard,’’ she said.

The 17-13 party-line vote sends the bill to the House.

Sent to Arizona's House in a party-line vote to expand the state's racketeering laws so that if you're a citizen at a protest and it turns violent (like thousands upon thousands of peaceful Americans have been when small groups come and commit violence), they want to be able to seize your money, property, etc. Blatant attempts to intimidate people and curtail Americans' freedoms of speech and assembly at its finest most disgusting.

Need to think of a witty signature.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Shai Hulud's post
23-02-2017, 07:49 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
Do overzealous police sicking dogs on peaceful protesters, near oil pipelines, get exempt from that? Consider

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like TheGulegon's post
23-02-2017, 07:53 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
If I'm ever near a riot demonstration, I head the other way. My lawyers are better than the popo's lawyers, anyway. Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Fireball's post
23-02-2017, 08:02 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
Gestapo tactics meant to squash people's right to free speech and free assembly.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 8 users Like pablo's post
23-02-2017, 09:07 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
(23-02-2017 08:02 PM)pablo Wrote:  Gestapo tactics meant to squash people's right to free speech and free assembly.

Yes Except that there is sometimes a contingent of violent peckerheads who show up just to cause problems for everybody else, for their own personal gain.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Fireball's post
23-02-2017, 09:08 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
What the fuckity fuck?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like julep's post
23-02-2017, 09:11 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
(23-02-2017 09:08 PM)julep Wrote:  What the fuckity fuck?

That should be your catch phrase.

"If you keep trying to better yourself that's enough for me. We don't decide which hand we are dealt in life, but we make the decision to play it or fold it" - Nishi Karano Kaze
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like JDog554's post
23-02-2017, 09:12 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
(23-02-2017 09:07 PM)Fireball Wrote:  
(23-02-2017 08:02 PM)pablo Wrote:  Gestapo tactics meant to squash people's right to free speech and free assembly.

Yes Except that there is sometimes a contingent of violent peckerheads who show up just to cause problems for everybody else, for their own personal gain.

Like was mentioned in the article, with this law in place, what's to stop someone who opposes the protesters from posing as one of them and causing trouble.
This can't be allowed, it's far too overreaching.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like pablo's post
23-02-2017, 09:30 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
That's messed up.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Lucipurr's post
23-02-2017, 09:41 PM
RE: Arizona Senate Votes To Seize Assets of Protesters When Protests Turn Violent
Can't possibly survive a court challenge.

Atheism is NOT a Religion. It's A Personal Relationship With Reality!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Minimalist's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: