Banning
|
|
|
10-02-2015, 09:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(10-02-2015 09:21 AM)DLJ Wrote:(10-02-2015 07:49 AM)morondog Wrote: And what exactly the fuck is wrong with that? You make a prophetic argument. ![]() Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
10-02-2015, 05:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(09-02-2015 09:15 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: But it's also a dictatorship, so someone can be banned just because they're being a dick. Technically it's a duumvirate but one of the pair is always stoned out of his gourd and is still pondering, "What the fuck is a quasi atheist anyway?" ![]() #sigh |
||||
![]() |
10-02-2015, 09:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(10-02-2015 05:18 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:(09-02-2015 09:15 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: But it's also a dictatorship, so someone can be banned just because they're being a dick. ![]() So many cats, so few good recipes. |
||||
![]() |
12-02-2015, 02:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(09-02-2015 10:36 PM)Stark Raving Wrote:(09-02-2015 09:29 PM)claywise Wrote: I guess I can't say The Q Continuum is an actual dick, but jeeeeezzzz, is he a predictable, tiresome one note. Plus I hate looking at his avatar; never liked Q's face. I put Q on ignore, I just can't stomach his inanities anymore. A point I would like to make, he is here to proselytize, because he's polite, he's gotten around the forum rules that usually get the theist pricks banned. Because he knows to obey the rules, he's effectively using the forum to proselytize without being banned. He's such an execrable, pompous, dishonest jackass he may actually drive people away from the theist position, but I believe a lot of pastors and assistant pastors are big-time con artists/used car salesman. They're selling their beat up lemon and telling everyone how wonderful it is, they will figure out how to sell their lemon in every place that will give them a chance. Anyway, I feel better now. ![]() Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition |
||||
![]() |
12-02-2015, 02:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(09-02-2015 10:36 PM)Stark Raving Wrote:(09-02-2015 09:29 PM)claywise Wrote: I guess I can't say The Q Continuum is an actual dick, but jeeeeezzzz, is he a predictable, tiresome one note. Plus I hate looking at his avatar; never liked Q's face. That would help explain why he hasn't gotten banned. |
||||
![]() |
13-02-2015, 01:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(12-02-2015 02:07 PM)Rik Wrote:(09-02-2015 10:36 PM)Stark Raving Wrote: His avatar suits him well. Pompous prick. I have nothing against him either. He's always polite, doesn't seem to break any rules or anything. He's a theist, so we can't realistically expect him to behave any other way. ![]() Having problems with your computer? Visit our Free Tech Support thread for help! |
||||
![]() |
13-02-2015, 02:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(09-02-2015 10:42 PM)Full Circle Wrote:(09-02-2015 10:36 PM)Stark Raving Wrote: His avatar suits him well. Pompous prick. lol A theist gets your goat? ![]() Having problems with your computer? Visit our Free Tech Support thread for help! |
||||
![]() |
13-02-2015, 02:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Banning
(12-02-2015 02:00 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:(09-02-2015 10:36 PM)Stark Raving Wrote: His avatar suits him well. Pompous prick. Actually proselytizing isn't really against the rules. Causing a disturbance, spamming, and not even trying to engage in meaningful debate however can result in a ban. HBL who would copy/paste the same post in two or thre of the threads he started... Q is annoying, but like a few others tomasia, silly childeye, don't really come close as others who have been banned. Just my 2 cents. But as if to knock me down, reality came around And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces |
||||
![]() |
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)