Bigfoot
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
24-01-2013, 10:11 PM (This post was last modified: 24-01-2013 10:18 PM by ghostexorcist.)
RE: Bigfoot
This is one extremely flawed analysis of the original Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film by the professional SFX artist Bill Munns. I've listed some of the things I find wrong with it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...O8c38cRo#!

1. The picture of the human model (HM) and the screen capture of the Bigfoot were taken at different distances and angles, which causes scaling issues.
2. The HM, a woman who appears to have a long torso, is not going to have the same proportions of the man who is believed to have worn the suit.
3. The HM is standing erect, whereas the Bigfoot is slightly bent forward.
4. The image of the HM had to be manipulated in order for it to line up with the frame from the P-G film.
3. The hips of the HM and Bigfoot are angled differently, the latter being twisted away from the camera. This would obviously cause scaling issues because the hips and knees of Bigfoot would not line up with those of the HM. Plus, the hip angle makes the Bigfoot torso appear shorter and the arms longer.
4. The left leg of the HM is not at the same angle as Bigfoot.
5. Bill dismisses the idea of padded shoulders or arm extensions too easily. Padded shoulders would make the arms look much longer.
6. The heads of the HM and the Bigfoot are at different angles, the former facing towards the camera and the latter angled slightly away.

I'm surprised that a professional with decades of experience with camera angles and anatomy would make so many mistakes. Yet, people take what he says as gospel.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-02-2013, 01:41 PM
RE: Bigfoot
Ladies and gentlemen, I present the dumbest conspiracy nut bigfoot comment I've ever read. I found the highlighted bit to be the funniest part. Apparently the
validity of evolution would be marred if a previously unknown species of ape was found in North America. I have a feeling this person doesn't know much about anything.

Quote:
Miltary men have already said the US keeps the Sasquatch covered
because they know they are part human and it doesnt fit with the history
books or Darwin theory that they want most people buying into
.
I've always had the feeling Sasquatch is some sort of human hybrid.
Really awesome all the things some of the military guys talked
about on Coast to Coast Am with Art bell on why governement doesnt
come out and acknowledge them is true. Squatch is pretty much an
intelligent form of humanoid that was itentionally not
classified for tons of reasons.

Even the St. Helens Volcano incident there are detail reports of one
Sasquatch that looked so human in many ways and was trying to
communicate and government wisked it away with other bodies.. All these
folks saying its an ape I am now certain are in for a rude awakening. (source)
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-02-2013, 02:25 PM
RE: Bigfoot
Ha! Just the other day i heard about a film crew from one of these shows instigating a sighting not too far from where I live. Now, pardon me for thinking, but where in the fuck is squatch (I love that word) going to hide all of his life in the middle of fucking Kansas?

"It's a most distressing affliction to have a sentimental heart and a skeptical mind.”
― نجيب محفوظ, Sugar Street
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes evenheathen's post
02-02-2013, 04:01 PM
RE: Bigfoot
(02-02-2013 01:41 PM)ghostexorcist Wrote:  Ladies and gentlemen, I present the dumbest conspiracy nut bigfoot comment I've ever read. I found the highlighted bit to be the funniest part. Apparently the
validity of evolution would be marred if a previously unknown species of ape was found in North America. I have a feeling this person doesn't know much about anything.

Quote:
Miltary men have already said the US keeps the Sasquatch covered
because they know they are part human and it doesnt fit with the history
books or Darwin theory that they want most people buying into
.
I've always had the feeling Sasquatch is some sort of human hybrid.
Really awesome all the things some of the military guys talked
about on Coast to Coast Am with Art bell on why governement doesnt
come out and acknowledge them is true. Squatch is pretty much an
intelligent form of humanoid that was itentionally not
classified for tons of reasons.

Even the St. Helens Volcano incident there are detail reports of one
Sasquatch that looked so human in many ways and was trying to
communicate and government wisked it away with other bodies.. All these
folks saying its an ape I am now certain are in for a rude awakening. (source)



[Image: IcJnQOT.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Vosur's post
16-07-2013, 12:31 PM
RE: Bigfoot
A stabilized version of the original Patterson-Gimlin bigfoot film. It still looks like a man in a suit to me.

[Image: mk_davis_pgf.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes ghostexorcist's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: