Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
28-11-2013, 11:54 PM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(28-11-2013 10:58 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(28-11-2013 10:34 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  What is the double standard?

I claim it is harder for theists to accumulate positive rep on this forum then atheists.

Chas has selective memory...if you read the thread in question you will see the reason I "whined" is because some people were making a big deal about me having a negative rep(I was minus 8 minus 9 at the time). Others made an issue about my rep first, but Chas gives them a pass because he is in that clique. If I counter the claims of that clique...I'm whining....in his mind at least.

Hmm....
I give rep to people who I either really like for some reason or other or they generally say things I agree with. So by my standards, yes, it is harder for a theist to get reps. It is not a double standard though. It's just that I don't usually agree with theists, so to catch my attention a theist would have to make an extra effort.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Losty's post
29-11-2013, 12:05 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(28-11-2013 11:54 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  
(28-11-2013 10:58 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  I claim it is harder for theists to accumulate positive rep on this forum then atheists.

Chas has selective memory...if you read the thread in question you will see the reason I "whined" is because some people were making a big deal about me having a negative rep(I was minus 8 minus 9 at the time). Others made an issue about my rep first, but Chas gives them a pass because he is in that clique. If I counter the claims of that clique...I'm whining....in his mind at least.

Hmm....
I give rep to people who I either really like for some reason or other or they generally say things I agree with. So by my standards, yes, it is harder for a theist to get reps. It is not a double standard though. It's just that I don't usually agree with theists, so to catch my attention a theist would have to make an extra effort.

Then there's KC, who I don't agree with, but I'm pretty sure I'd enjoy sitting down and having a beer with. Heywood, PJ, alpha male, and Lion IRC don't fall into that category, so I've never repped them; simple as that. Drinking Beverage

[Image: GrumpyCat_01.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes EvolutionKills's post
29-11-2013, 12:34 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(28-11-2013 11:54 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  Hmm....
I give rep to people who I either really like for some reason or other or they generally say things I agree with. So by my standards, yes, it is harder for a theist to get reps. It is not a double standard though. It's just that I don't usually agree with theists, so to catch my attention a theist would have to make an extra effort.

So you agree with my claim that it is harder for theists to gain positive rep but disagree with me calling it a double standard? When I say "double standard" I am talking about a combination of the phenomena you describe as well as other phenomena. For instance in the "I and I got banned" thread. Bucky ridiculed my name. Everyone simply ignored it. I ridiculed Bucky's name and I got called out for it......by a mod. Why is it okay for Bucky to ridicule someone else but not me?

In this thread Bucky called me a "fool" and claimed I haven't said anything intelligent.....which obviously poor, trollish behavior....and it gets ignored. Were I to start trashing Bucky back....well then I am just being an arrogant ass, or a troll, or weak minded....that's the double standard.

.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 12:44 AM (This post was last modified: 29-11-2013 12:52 AM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:34 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(28-11-2013 11:54 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  Hmm....
I give rep to people who I either really like for some reason or other or they generally say things I agree with. So by my standards, yes, it is harder for a theist to get reps. It is not a double standard though. It's just that I don't usually agree with theists, so to catch my attention a theist would have to make an extra effort.

So you agree with my claim that it is harder for theists to gain positive rep but disagree with me calling it a double standard? When I say "double standard" I am talking about a combination of the phenomena you describe as well as other phenomena. For instance in the "I and I got banned" thread. Bucky ridiculed my name. Everyone simply ignored it. I ridiculed Bucky's name and I got called out for it......by a mod. Why is it okay for Bucky to ridicule someone else but not me?

In this thread Bucky called me a "fool" and claimed I haven't said anything intelligent.....which obviously poor, trollish behavior....and it gets ignored. Were I to start trashing Bucky back....well then I am just being an arrogant ass, or a troll, or weak minded....that's the double standard.

.

Waaaa waaaa waaaa
Someone who comes to TTA, makes a name called Hey-would-ya-blow-me, then proceeds to whine about it, is a fool. You are a troll. You have never once posted anything intelligent, from day one.
Keep whining, maybe you'll get more mercy fucks, Blowjob.
Pardon me, for "ridiculing" your august name. Mr. Jablowme.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music - Friedrich Nietzsche
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 12:45 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:34 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  For instance in the "I and I got banned" thread. Bucky ridiculed my name. Everyone simply ignored it. I ridiculed Bucky's name and I got called out for it......by a mod. Why is it okay for Bucky to ridicule someone else but not me?

In this thread Bucky called me a "fool" and claimed I haven't said anything intelligent.....which obviously poor, trollish behavior....and it gets ignored. Were I to start trashing Bucky back....well then I am just being an arrogant ass, or a troll, or weak minded....that's the double standard.

Because your name is fucking ridiculous.

And how many threads are you going to turn into a whine-fest? If someone gives you shit, give 'im shit back.

[Image: klingon_zps7e68578a.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like houseofcantor's post
29-11-2013, 12:57 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(28-11-2013 10:58 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(28-11-2013 10:34 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  What is the double standard?
I claim it is harder for theists to accumulate positive rep on this forum then atheists.

Oh, really?

That is an interesting hypothesis.

Thumbsup

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 01:09 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:45 AM)houseofcantor Wrote:  And how many threads are you going to turn into a whine-fest? If someone gives you shit, give 'im shit back.

Read this thread. Chas claimed I whined to get my rep increase. Am I not allowed to disagree with him? If I am allowed to disagree with him am I not allowed to make my case? I'm sorry if my case sounds like whining to you, but remember...Chas brought this subject up....not me.

HOC, Why is it everytime I make my case in response to an accusation, you always whine about it?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 01:21 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:44 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Waaaa waaaa waaaa
Someone who comes to TTA, makes a name called Hey-would-ya-blow-me, then proceeds to whine about it, is a fool. You are a troll. You have never once posted anything intelligent, from day one.
Keep whining, maybe you'll get more mercy fucks, Blowjob.
Pardon me, for "ridiculing" your august name. Mr. Jablowme.

The double standard is getting called out for ridiculing your name while you not getting called out for ridiculing mine. We both had reasons for ridiculing each others names.

You say my name is an excuse to be a dick to me.
I say you dickish behavior toward me is an excuse to be a dick to you.

I get called out for being a dick, you don't. That's the double standard because we were both being dicks.

In any event your last post is just another example of why I neg repped you. If you want me to rescind the neg rep....just promise to stop insulting people.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 01:26 AM
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:57 AM)Dark Light Wrote:  
(28-11-2013 10:58 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  I claim it is harder for theists to accumulate positive rep on this forum then atheists.

Oh, really?

That is an interesting hypothesis.

Thumbsup

I remember the 'ol days, when rep was a pain to gain. Now people are generous with it.

The people closely associated with the namesake of female canines are suffering from a nondescript form of lunacy.
"Anti-environmentalism is like standing in front of a forest and going 'quick kill them they're coming right for us!'" - Jake Farr-Wharton, The Imaginary Friend Show.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-11-2013, 01:38 AM (This post was last modified: 29-11-2013 02:20 AM by EvolutionKills.)
RE: Blowjob FINALLY has enough rep points to neg rep Bucky
(29-11-2013 12:34 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  So you agree with my claim that it is harder for theists to gain positive rep but disagree with me calling it a double standard? When I say "double standard" I am talking about a combination of the phenomena you describe as well as other phenomena. For instance in the "I and I got banned" thread. Bucky ridiculed my name. Everyone simply ignored it. I ridiculed Bucky's name and I got called out for it......by a mod. Why is it okay for Bucky to ridicule someone else but not me?

In this thread Bucky called me a "fool" and claimed I haven't said anything intelligent.....which obviously poor, trollish behavior....and it gets ignored. Were I to start trashing Bucky back....well then I am just being an arrogant ass, or a troll, or weak minded....that's the double standard.


I'm struck by two things here.

First, try going to CatholicForums and posting politely as an agnostic and see what kind of response you'll get in comparison to going in their with a obvious joke name and being a belligerent anti-theist. I doubt they'd be anywhere near as tolerable as this forum has been in putting up with ridiculous bullshit. Also, the positive reputations of both KC and TheThinkingTheist lend more weight to the idea that reputation is a gauge of how you present yourself in the forum, not what you present in the forum. I strongly disagree with both of them on any number of issues, but they've both handled their presence here with far more grace and aplomb then you have. Flip side of course is that people here generally are going to be more favorable to a certain point of view, it is in the fucking name of the forum after all. That said I think Taq can be just as uncouth and boorish as you, even if he does agree with me, and it's why I haven't repped him either. But then gain, I don't negative rep anyone either.

Also, the reason we haven't bothered to correct Bucky when he claims you've said nothing intelligent, it's because I assume many of us mostly agree with him and are tired of your behavior. Yes, Bucky is being an ass; and yes, you deserve it to an extent. You have your moments, and lately you've been making progress; but you never seem to be able to keep on the up and up. Honestly outside of the Theism/Atheism forum you're pretty reasonable. But every time I start thinking that you're making improvement, I always end up reading something you've posted and it sets you right back where you started. Quite simply you're digging yourself out of a monstrous hole that you put yourself into, so don't be surprised when it takes you even more work to get up and out of your hole; let alone making upward progress. Forums have long memories and you've left a bad taste in a lot of mouth's here.

[Image: GrumpyCat_01.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 7 users Like EvolutionKills's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: