CNN Democratic Debate
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
14-10-2015, 07:25 PM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
So, nobody cares about Hillary's emails?
FBI does.

English is my second language.
I AM DEPLORABLE AND IRREDEEMABLE
SHE PERSISTED WE RESISTED
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-10-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 05:41 PM)kineo Wrote:  So, who's gonna pay for it? We are. The tax payers. They are. The tax payers. The rich are. The tax payers.

Financial transaction tax of .5%, least that's the ride Bernie's pimping. Undecided

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes houseofcantor's post
14-10-2015, 07:47 PM (This post was last modified: 14-10-2015 07:50 PM by ClydeLee.)
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 07:19 PM)Alla Wrote:  
(14-10-2015 05:18 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  All I saw in this debate was how far to the left the Democrats have gone. It's like they were trying to see who could hand out the most free stuff. They've gone full blown socialist. I mean, who's going to pay for this stuff? Free college? More handouts? I pay enough damn taxes. Buying votes through the promise of free shit has become the democratic platform.

who is going to pay for this stuff? most likely you and me.
and future generations.

Been demonstrably not shown that but, ti's fine, you prefer believing things on faith anyway. The evidence of what a already explained on these threads plan would be is clearly there... now would it ever go through with the current congress, no.

(14-10-2015 07:42 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  Financial transaction tax of .5%, least that's the ride Bernie's pimping. Undecided

Also his supposed plan of paying for said things is expounded out via paying for it via saving Trillions via adjusting healthcare single payer options opposed to forced purely privatized pay as well as those higher wealth tax adjustments.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-10-2015, 07:57 PM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 07:25 PM)Alla Wrote:  So, nobody cares about Hillary's emails?
FBI does.

Nope. There is a CFR policy which says Government communications on private networks is verboten but it is practically unenforceable. If I'm talking to a contractor via email I got no choice but to use his gmail account for official communications. Given her access to classified information the larger question is if there was spillage of classified info in those emails. And even if the info was unclassified at the time of the email and classified later it still counts as spillage. She fucked up. She owned up to it.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-10-2015, 08:00 PM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 07:42 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  Financial transaction tax of .5%, least that's the ride Bernie's pimping. Undecided

That could work. Thumbsup

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-10-2015, 08:26 PM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 07:47 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  Also his supposed plan of paying for said things is expounded out via paying for it via saving Trillions via adjusting healthcare single payer options opposed to forced purely privatized pay as well as those higher wealth tax adjustments.

There's all too many "via"s in there. Tongue

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like houseofcantor's post
15-10-2015, 09:46 AM (This post was last modified: 15-10-2015 09:49 AM by Alla.)
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
America got new preacher of morality - socialist Sanders.
He preaches that it is morally wrong when while some have too much others have too little.
I have questions to him and all followers of his philosophy:

1) why should I trust socialists on "right" or "wrong"?
2) why is it morally wrong when while some have too much others have too little?
3) what will happen to me if this preacher of morality gets power and I am very rich but disagree with his philosophy/morality?
will he force me to do obey him? will he jail me? will he kill me?

English is my second language.
I AM DEPLORABLE AND IRREDEEMABLE
SHE PERSISTED WE RESISTED
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 09:53 AM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(15-10-2015 09:46 AM)Alla Wrote:  America got new preacher of morality - socialist Sanders.
He preaches that it is morally wrong when while some have too much others have too little.
I have questions to him and all followers of his philosophy:

1) why should I trust socialists on "right" or "wrong"?
2) why is it morally wrong when while some have too much others have too little?
3) what will happen to me if this preacher of morality gets power and I am very rich but disagree with his philosophy/morality?
will he force me to do obey him? will he jail me? will he kill me?

1. Why would that have to do with a matter of trust? Or have to do with anything?
2. Ones morals are individual but pile into a collective. The public current US collective seems to agree with that sentiment.
3. Probably nothing will happen. Because even if he had power, he's still 1 person in a sea of a system currently filled with those who want to support the very rich. How would one be forced to obey, obey what? Obey agreeing to what exactly and why would there be punishment of jail or death?

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 09:56 AM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(14-10-2015 07:07 AM)RobbyPants Wrote:  [*]Webb - More conservative than the others, for the most part. The single, most resounding thing from him in the debate was he's super mad he didn't get to talk as much as everyone else*. Now, this is somewhat of a fair criticism, but that's pretty much all I'm going to remember about him. I also couldn't tell if his answer to the last question (who is your biggest enemy you've made) was serious or not. It was certainly dumb. I don't expect his candidacy to last much longer.
I will remember this about him: he is the only one who was honest and BRAVE when he answered the question: are all lives matter or black lives matter?
His answer was: all lives matter.
The rest (cowards) said: black lives matter.


do all lives matter or black lives matter?
Sanders answered: black lives matter. Thank you, new preacher of morality, for letting me know that my life doesn't matter.

English is my second language.
I AM DEPLORABLE AND IRREDEEMABLE
SHE PERSISTED WE RESISTED
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 10:03 AM
RE: CNN Democratic Debate
(15-10-2015 09:56 AM)Alla Wrote:  
(14-10-2015 07:07 AM)RobbyPants Wrote:  [*]Webb - More conservative than the others, for the most part. The single, most resounding thing from him in the debate was he's super mad he didn't get to talk as much as everyone else*. Now, this is somewhat of a fair criticism, but that's pretty much all I'm going to remember about him. I also couldn't tell if his answer to the last question (who is your biggest enemy you've made) was serious or not. It was certainly dumb. I don't expect his candidacy to last much longer.
I will remember this about him: he is the only one who was honest and BRAVE when he answered the question: are all lives matter or black lives matter?
His answer was: all lives matter.
The rest (cowards) said: black lives matter.


do all lives matter or black lives matter?
Sanders answered: black lives matter. Thank you, new preacher of morality, for letting me know that my life doesn't matter.

It's a matter of context. One statement is a purpose driven slogan. One statement is a truism.

I mean, duh. Tongue

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes houseofcantor's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: