Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-03-2015, 08:48 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(08-03-2015 08:04 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(08-03-2015 09:38 AM)unfogged Wrote:  Laugh out load
Something tells me that if we start playing the "find the biggest asshole in the Catholic hierarchy" we'd never reach the end of the list! They seem to vie with each other as to who can be the biggest hypocrite and who can justify the vilest actions.

The biggest current living asshole? Consider

Because the sine qua non of Catholic assholes has to be the Papal legate Arnaud Amalric of "Kill them all, God will know His own" fame at the massacre at Béziers.

Hmm. I never knew that. He was Abbott of Citeaux about 100 years after Bernard of Clairvaux, Stephen Harding and Robert of Molesme. Pretty scandalous for the Cistercians. No wonder they never mention it.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 03:45 AM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
Pope Pius ix, pope from 1846-78, was one seriously big asshole.

He declared himself infallible!

http://one-evil.org/content/people_19c_pius_ix.html
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Mark Fulton's post
09-03-2015, 04:54 AM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(09-03-2015 03:45 AM)Mark Fulton Wrote:  Pope Pius ix, pope from 1846-78, was one seriously big asshole.

He declared himself infallible!

http://one-evil.org/content/people_19c_pius_ix.html

Hehehe Big Grin That's one funky lil' site you linked to...

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 05:13 AM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(09-03-2015 04:54 AM)morondog Wrote:  
(09-03-2015 03:45 AM)Mark Fulton Wrote:  Pope Pius ix, pope from 1846-78, was one seriously big asshole.

He declared himself infallible!

http://one-evil.org/content/people_19c_pius_ix.html

Hehehe Big Grin That's one funky lil' site you linked to...

Wow! Yes.

And I thought I'd been joking all this time when I called them The Cafia.

And there it is, listed among all the other crimes of which he was accused.... creating the Cosa Nostra.

Nice chap.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:17 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(07-03-2015 07:07 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(07-03-2015 06:54 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  And? All that would mean is that I get to whine about being banned from here like you guys have whined about getting banned from Suscipe Domine for literal pages.

It's "literally" dear. Adverbs end in "ly", which you will learn when you go get an education.

(07-03-2015 06:54 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Violence, death, fire, death, fire-death, and death-fire. That enough for ya bro?Smile

Jebus has done so much for you, I see.

(07-03-2015 06:54 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Oh, I'm well aware of that. The pedophelia problem in the Church in the U.S. is less pre-pubescent pedophelia, and more of a post-pubescent homosexual problem. Not that that's our fault either, you can thank your precious Sexual Revolution for all the faggots that just 'coincidentally' happen to also be pedos infiltrating the Church's ranks in the U.S.

Prove it. (And BTW, that's not what your idiotic John Jay Law School report said, that YOU referenced. So which is it ? )
It's not "pedophelia, dear. It's spelled "pedophilia".
You know SO much about it, and you can't even fucking spell it. Laughat
The pedo problem exists in all countries not just the US, dear. Obviously you know NOTHING about the huge mess also in Ireland and many other countries.
Nice try at the same ole same ole attempt at dismissing the problem. There is no evidence the victims were the initiators. In fact there is a mountain of evidence they were not.

Quote: It's "literally" dear. Adverbs end in "ly", which you will learn when you go get an education.

Check your grammar, bud, that's not the right usage.


Quote:Prove it. (And BTW, that's not what your idiotic John Jay Law School report said, that YOU referenced. So which is it ? )
It's not "pedophelia, dear. It's spelled "pedophilia".
You know SO much about it, and you can't even fucking spell it. Laughat
The pedo problem exists in all countries not just the US, dear. Obviously you know NOTHING about the huge mess also in Ireland and many other countries.
Nice try at the same ole same ole attempt at dismissing the problem. There is no evidence the victims were the initiators. In fact there is a mountain of evidence they were not.

When did I ever say that the victims were the initiators? I said that this happened because of the massive 'outage' so to speak of sodomites during the Sexual Revolution. Although, if you dispute this, could you mind explaining why this wasn't even an issue 'until' the Sexual Revolution happened.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:19 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(09-03-2015 05:13 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(09-03-2015 04:54 AM)morondog Wrote:  Hehehe Big Grin That's one funky lil' site you linked to...

Wow! Yes.

And I thought I'd been joking all this time when I called them The Cafia.

And there it is, listed among all the other crimes of which he was accused.... creating the Cosa Nostra.

Nice chap.

i
Quote:n line with the most ancient satanic worship of Inanna and Astarthe, the female God of Power, Sex and War.

Somehow, I don't think that site is very reliable.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:24 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(07-03-2015 08:54 PM)Mark Fulton Wrote:  
(07-03-2015 06:54 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  And? All that would mean is that I get to whine about being banned from here like you guys have whined about getting banned from Suscipe Domine for literal pages.


Violence, death, fire, death, fire-death, and death-fire. That enough for ya bro?Smile


Oh, I'm well aware of that. The pedophelia problem in the Church in the U.S. is less pre-pubescent pedophelia, and more of a post-pubescent homosexual problem. Not that that's our fault either, you can thank your precious Sexual Revolution for all the faggots that just 'coincidentally' happen to also be pedos infiltrating the Church's ranks in the U.S.

Petrov is blaming the paedphile behaviour of Catholic priests on the secular world! He is not the only Catholic to use this tactic....

Various Catholic officials are still arrogant enough to try to pass the blame for the sexual abuse perpetrated by their own priests on to others!

- They’ve claimed that psychiatrists and psychologists knew little of pedophilia and therefore they weren’t able to predict future behavior. This isn’t true, and is feeble. When has the Vatican seriously ever listened to health professionals, and particularly psychiatrists?

- The Reverend Raniero Cantalamessa, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raniero_Cantalamessa) speaking at Good Friday prayers 2010 in St Peter’s Basilica, attended by the Pope, likened criticism of his church to the
“most shameful aspects of anti-Semitism,” (http://richarddawkins.net/articles/5364–...-semitism) as if to say he now knew how the Jews have felt. He was treading on very shaky ground, as his church has treated Jews abysmally over the centuries.

- Papal spokesman have claimed they’re being picked on, for example that news coverage was motivated by sensationalism. They defend their church from outside “enemies” who “assault” it and subject it to “a smear campaign.” They have the church itself as the victim! What’s more, they don’t realize or care that the publicity helps protect future victims from abuse.

- They’ve been quoted as blaming the “secular world,” “gay culture,” child pornography, or people hoping for a payout. Giovanni Maria Vian, editor of L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican’s official newspaper, said the criticism of Pope Benedict XVI and the Vatican in handling the clerical sex abuse crisis was part of a media campaign to sell newspapers (Catholic Spirit. April 12, 2010.)

- They’ve stated that the church is being unfairly picked out because pedophiles are at least as common in other walks of life, which is a dubious assertion. What about their claim to be society’s shining example of morality? What then, is their excuse for protecting offenders?

- As recently as April 2010, at Easter Mass in St. Peter’s Square, Angelo Sodano, dean of the College of Cardinals, publically assured Benedict that the faithful were
“…unimpressed by the gossip of the moment.”

If he really needed to tell the pope this, he should have done it privately. He was trying to create public opinion, not report on it.

- Ratzinger himself claimed
“…in the 1970s, pedophilia was theorized as something fully in conformity with man and even with children” (http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-d...on-society - ixzz1FXDtPn3n).
I don’t know anyone who would agree with him.

Ratzinger also tried to twist the focus onto others by stating how child sexual tourism in the third world was
“…threatening an entire generation.”

If he had really cared about that, he should have done his bit by removing all child-abusing priests from their jobs and handed their records over to the police. (http://www.sott.net/article/220257-Vatic...-his-day).

These excuses and this blame shifting amount to pathetic arguments. Vatican officials try to talk about a broader context that the church isn’t responsible for and can’t or couldn’t have done anything about, and thereby deliberately avoid addressing the contexts that matter: admitting the church’s guilt, how they’re going to deal with past and future offenders, and how they propose to recompense the victims.

Well, actually, I am blaming it on the secular world, because the Sexual Revolution was the secular world's fault in the first place.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(07-03-2015 07:47 PM)DLJ Wrote:  
(07-03-2015 07:31 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  I thought one smoked faggots in Britain.

Actually, I'm having a fag right now.

But technically, yes, faggots would produce smoke.

[Image: The-real-definition-of-faggot-lgbt-28232273-480-361.jpg]

They both produce smoke when burned Weeping
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(09-03-2015 11:19 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  ...
Somehow, I don't think that site is very reliable.

My instinct leads me to agree.

But given the general cuckoo-ness of catholic wisdom and its historically / hysterically fascistic tendencies / associations it's not altogether unbelievable.

Drinking Beverage

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-03-2015, 11:32 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(09-03-2015 11:26 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(07-03-2015 07:47 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Actually, I'm having a fag right now.

But technically, yes, faggots would produce smoke.

[Image: The-real-definition-of-faggot-lgbt-28232273-480-361.jpg]

They both produce smoke when burned Weeping

Correction: All three forms of faggot would produce smoke when burned.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: