Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
12-03-2015, 07:03 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 06:52 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 05:40 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  You mean like that damn heretic Galileo Gallilei?

Well, first off, they didn't execute him, ...

I thought we were talking about whether or not they "saw fit to" 'cause they most certainly "saw fit to" torture and kill his ass.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
12-03-2015, 07:34 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 04:37 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Which is complete horseshit. If they're attracted to those of the same sex, regardless of age, they're homosexual.

That's simply not true. If you'd bother to educate yourself, you might understand. Being attracted to kids is not normal and it's a whole other category from normal sexuality.

(12-03-2015 04:37 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  No, it's an appeal to nature fallacy. Animals practice cannibalism, that doesn't make it okay.

So you're going to claim animals are sinning now? Drinking Beverage

The point of the animal kingdom is that it's very strong evidence that homosexuality is biological in origin. And, if your god exists, then your god CREATED them that way and yet condemns them like an asshole. Either way - god or none - it means it's wrong to treat homosexuals like they are doing something immoral.

@DonaldTrump, Patriotism is not honoring your flag no matter what your country/leader does. It's doing whatever it takes to make your country the best it can be as long as its not violent.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2015, 07:44 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 07:03 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 06:52 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Well, first off, they didn't execute him, ...

I thought we were talking about whether or not they "saw fit to" 'cause they most certainly "saw fit to" torture and kill his ass.

Well they clearly didn't because, you know, they didn't torture or kill him.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2015, 07:47 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 06:55 PM)pablo Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 06:53 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Well, by that logic, evolutionary science is also subjective.

Facts baby, facts. Not opinions or interpretation.

People interpret the fossils and their dating methods in different ways as well, the fact that there are so many young-earth creationists around should tell you that.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2015, 08:08 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 04:34 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 07:35 AM)Chas Wrote:  I have disagreed with many people, many times but that didn't mean they were insane.

You believe that killing people for disagreeing with your dirty little religion is justified - that is insane.

Quote:You believe that killing people for disagreeing with your dirty little religion is justified - that is insane.

Disagreeing with it is, in itself, insane.

You believe in something without evidence. Do you think that sane? Consider

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
12-03-2015, 08:11 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 04:46 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Nah, lib-tards are notoriously weak-willed wimps. There's no way you'd last more than five seconds. It's not like you even have the moral high ground here either, considering that the secularist revolutionaries were the ones to use violence first.

Oh, do tell. Was that before the Inquisition? Before the burning of 'witches'? Before the Crusades? Before the slaughter of heretics?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
12-03-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 05:01 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 01:20 AM)morondog Wrote:  PS PS: I've come across protestants who condemn various practices as 'heretical'. I'd be interested to know how you decide who's the heretic?

Evidence and theological validity.

Theology is the study of fairy tales. There is nothing valid about theology.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
12-03-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 07:47 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 06:55 PM)pablo Wrote:  Facts baby, facts. Not opinions or interpretation.

People interpret the fossils and their dating methods in different ways as well, the fact that there are so many young-earth creationists around should tell you that.

What that tells me, is that there are a lot of people so locked into a superstitious belief, they can't disagree with any of it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes pablo's post
12-03-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 06:53 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 06:52 PM)pablo Wrote:  Which ones you consider wrong isn't subjective?

Well, by that logic, evolutionary science is also subjective.

No, it is based on evidence. Apparently, you don't understand what constitutes evidence.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Chas's post
12-03-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Catholics vs. TTA......Respectfully.....
(12-03-2015 07:34 PM)Impulse Wrote:  
(12-03-2015 04:37 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  Which is complete horseshit. If they're attracted to those of the same sex, regardless of age, they're homosexual.

That's simply not true. If you'd bother to educate yourself, you might understand. Being attracted to kids is not normal and it's a whole other category from normal sexuality.

(12-03-2015 04:37 PM)PetrovPolak Wrote:  No, it's an appeal to nature fallacy. Animals practice cannibalism, that doesn't make it okay.

So you're going to claim animals are sinning now? Drinking Beverage

The point of the animal kingdom is that it's very strong evidence that homosexuality is biological in origin. And, if your god exists, then your god CREATED them that way and yet condemns them like an asshole. Either way - god or none - it means it's wrong to treat homosexuals like they are doing something immoral.

And if the fool knew ANYTHING about Adolescent Psychology, he would know that many "straight" people "go through a *phase* " when they don't really know what they want or are. He's as clueless about this subject as he is about his own fucking cult. Big Grin

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: