Chemtrails biochemistry
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
26-05-2013, 10:38 AM
Chemtrails biochemistry
It is clear now that the chemtrails program is gay-based. The strong correlation between air traffic and states that have legalized gay marriage can no longer be denied. The recent caving in of the Boy Scouts only shows the specific targeting ability.

But the question of the chemistry is what's interesting. Is it a single active compound or a drug cocktail? Where can we find the research on this?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 10:46 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
Consider this your first warning, if you continue to flood the science section with nonsense as part of your childish rant it will be considered spam and will be taken further. Dont do it again!

Behold the power of the force!
[Image: fgYtjtY.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 10:47 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
(26-05-2013 10:46 AM)FSM_scot Wrote:  Consider this your first warning, if you continue to flood the science section with nonsense as part of your childish rant it will be considered spam and will be taken further. Dont do it again!

I suggest you do the right thing. First, get off your high horse - the only thing holding you there is your inability to admit you are wrong on this.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 10:54 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
I suggest you grow up and stop your tantrum.

Filox asked for the scientific explanation to why something isn't right, along with the gravitational effects other planets have on the earth, its a legit science question.

You cant seem to tell the difference between a legit question and utter spam that you are posting in a sad attempt at getting your way.

You have been warned to stop spamming, grow up!

Behold the power of the force!
[Image: fgYtjtY.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 10:56 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
(26-05-2013 10:54 AM)FSM_scot Wrote:  I suggest you grow up and stop your tantrum.

Filox asked for the scientific explanation to why something isn't right, along with the gravitational effects other planets have on the earth, its a legit science question.

You cant seem to tell the difference between a legit question and utter spam that you are posting in a sad attempt at getting your way.

You have been warned to stop spamming, grow up!


You can't tell the difference between woo and science. Sad.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 11:08 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
What is Chas doing that IandI hasn't been doing for eons?

[Image: dobie.png]

Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Dom's post
26-05-2013, 11:14 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
The difference is see between Chas and IandI at this point is initial MO's since joining the forum.

[Image: 3d366d5c-72a0-4228-b835-f404c2970188_zps...1381867723]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 11:14 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
(26-05-2013 11:08 AM)Dom Wrote:  What is Chas doing that IandI hasn't been doing for eons?

Maybe the difference is that I am making a point while I&I is a mindless troll?

It's OK to be a stupid, mindless, ideological troll; not OK to be critical.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 11:15 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
(26-05-2013 11:14 AM)cheapthrillseaker Wrote:  The difference is see between Chas and IandI at this point is initial MO's since joining the forum.


Huh

Could you restate that in English?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
26-05-2013, 11:15 AM
RE: Chemtrails biochemistry
(26-05-2013 11:14 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(26-05-2013 11:08 AM)Dom Wrote:  What is Chas doing that IandI hasn't been doing for eons?

Maybe the difference is that I am making a point while I&I is a mindless troll?

It's OK to be a stupid, mindless, ideological troll; not OK to be critical.

Or maybe you're funny and he's boring?

[Image: dobie.png]

Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Dom's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: