Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
12-09-2013, 09:43 AM
Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
The rebels went into a town near ghoutta called latkia then kidnapped many women and children. Some of the children in the pictures of the chemical attack were identified as being kidnapped weeks earlier by rebel (alqaeda) forces.

The longer this is out the more and more the world can see right through the total bullshit of alqaeda and it's backers in the west.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...rders.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180149.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180130.html#nb2-1

In summary, US, British and French services are 100% certain that the Syrian Arab army gassed an unknown number of civilians:

- 1. For this they would have used a new kind of old sarin gas that does not affect women.
- 2. For four days, the United States observed the preparing of the crime without intervening.
- 3. The day before use, the magic gas killed children who were kidnapped by jihadists two weeks earlier and more than 200 miles away.
- 4. These events are known through authentic films made and sometimes posted in advance on YouTube.
- 5. They are confirmed by a telephone interception produced ​​by the Israeli enemy.
- 6. Western secret services have a secret method for identifying sarin gas without having to culture human tissue.
- 7. As it would be the fifteenth such operation, the "régime" would have crossed a "red line " and should be "punished" by bombing it to deprive it of its means of defense.

Another issue not noted in the west is that the videos were posted on youtube before the attack was said to have taken place.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2013, 05:13 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
So should the US keep funding Alqaeda that kills kids and then like the west parades dead kids on tv to goad people into a war?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2013, 05:43 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
What? A CNN report corroborating the idea that the attack was fake? When did CNN start real reporting?

http://youtu.be/kji74CZEiXI
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2013, 07:32 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
(12-09-2013 09:43 AM)I and I Wrote:  The rebels went into a town near ghoutta called latkia then kidnapped many women and children. Some of the children in the pictures of the chemical attack were identified as being kidnapped weeks earlier by rebel (alqaeda) forces.

The longer this is out the more and more the world can see right through the total bullshit of alqaeda and it's backers in the west.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...rders.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180149.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180130.html#nb2-1

In summary, US, British and French services are 100% certain that the Syrian Arab army gassed an unknown number of civilians:

- 1. For this they would have used a new kind of old sarin gas that does not affect women.
- 2. For four days, the United States observed the preparing of the crime without intervening.
- 3. The day before use, the magic gas killed children who were kidnapped by jihadists two weeks earlier and more than 200 miles away.
- 4. These events are known through authentic films made and sometimes posted in advance on YouTube.
- 5. They are confirmed by a telephone interception produced ​​by the Israeli enemy.
- 6. Western secret services have a secret method for identifying sarin gas without having to culture human tissue.
- 7. As it would be the fifteenth such operation, the "régime" would have crossed a "red line " and should be "punished" by bombing it to deprive it of its means of defense.

Another issue not noted in the west is that the videos were posted on youtube before the attack was said to have taken place.

You just copy paste shit from web sites, and regurgitate it?
There is no "new kind of Sarin gas, that only affects women" you idiot. Sarin gas affect the respiratory muscles, and has absolutely no way of discriminating between female respiratory muscles, and those found in males. Thanks for proving your utter and complete ignorance of every sort of science knowledge.
Really.
You're embarrassing yourself.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music - Friedrich Nietzsche
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2013, 07:40 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
(13-09-2013 07:32 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(12-09-2013 09:43 AM)I and I Wrote:  The rebels went into a town near ghoutta called latkia then kidnapped many women and children. Some of the children in the pictures of the chemical attack were identified as being kidnapped weeks earlier by rebel (alqaeda) forces.

The longer this is out the more and more the world can see right through the total bullshit of alqaeda and it's backers in the west.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...rders.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180149.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/article180130.html#nb2-1

In summary, US, British and French services are 100% certain that the Syrian Arab army gassed an unknown number of civilians:

- 1. For this they would have used a new kind of old sarin gas that does not affect women.
- 2. For four days, the United States observed the preparing of the crime without intervening.
- 3. The day before use, the magic gas killed children who were kidnapped by jihadists two weeks earlier and more than 200 miles away.
- 4. These events are known through authentic films made and sometimes posted in advance on YouTube.
- 5. They are confirmed by a telephone interception produced ​​by the Israeli enemy.
- 6. Western secret services have a secret method for identifying sarin gas without having to culture human tissue.
- 7. As it would be the fifteenth such operation, the "régime" would have crossed a "red line " and should be "punished" by bombing it to deprive it of its means of defense.

Another issue not noted in the west is that the videos were posted on youtube before the attack was said to have taken place.

You just copy paste shit from web sites, and regurgitate it?
There is no "new kind of Sarin gas, that only affects women" you idiot. Sarin gas affect the respiratory muscles, and has absolutely no way of discriminating between female respiratory muscles, and those found in males. Thanks for proving your utter and complete ignorance of every sort of science knowledge.
Really.
You're embarrassing yourself.

You must be fucking stupid. The comment about a "new kind of sarin gas" is called being a smart ass because it challenges the idea that according to official videos there are no fucking women. Hence the smart ass comment "it must be a new kind of chemical that doesn't affect women"

You are fucking stupid.

The CNN report, your thoughts?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-09-2013, 09:39 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
I&I, your 'evidence' for this kidnapping scenario consists entirely of the online rantings of another madman. I was wondering What this "Voltaire Network" was, and noticed that the author of the first article, Thierry Meyssan, is also its founder. The article is written by this one individual, and all its citations/sources are...itself. The evidence for this was a staged is based entirely on speculation and interpretation from this Thierry Meyssan guy.

Now, maybe Thierry Meyssan has sources he just could not disclose on his controversial claims. Most journalists when not disclosing sources will at least give the reader some description of the source to indicate what basis the journalist has for believing them. Thierry Meyssan gives no such attribution for his most controversial claims.

So, I&I, you are asking us to accept opinion from Thierry Meyssan as fact. Thierry Meyssan's articles could only be a basis for evidence if we considered him the direct source of this information and that he somehow has some direct knowledge of the events. His credibility is relevant to evaluating his claims. Would it surprise anyone that Thierry Meyssan claims that the 911 attacks were actually caused by "the US military industrial complex in order to impose a military regime". And that the Pentagon attack was caused by a missile and not a plane? Thierry Meyssan has also claimed that US agents have him marked for assassination . (ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan )

Your obsession with intricate conspiracy theories, and credulous acceptance of these outlandish claims of conspiracies, makes me think you could use professional help.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-09-2013, 02:25 AM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
(13-09-2013 09:39 PM)BryanS Wrote:  I&I, your 'evidence' for this kidnapping scenario consists entirely of the online rantings of another madman. I was wondering What this "Voltaire Network" was, and noticed that the author of the first article, Thierry Meyssan, is also its founder. The article is written by this one individual, and all its citations/sources are...itself. The evidence for this was a staged is based entirely on speculation and interpretation from this Thierry Meyssan guy.

Now, maybe Thierry Meyssan has sources he just could not disclose on his controversial claims. Most journalists when not disclosing sources will at least give the reader some description of the source to indicate what basis the journalist has for believing them. Thierry Meyssan gives no such attribution for his most controversial claims.

So, I&I, you are asking us to accept opinion from Thierry Meyssan as fact. Thierry Meyssan's articles could only be a basis for evidence if we considered him the direct source of this information and that he somehow has some direct knowledge of the events. His credibility is relevant to evaluating his claims. Would it surprise anyone that Thierry Meyssan claims that the 911 attacks were actually caused by "the US military industrial complex in order to impose a military regime". And that the Pentagon attack was caused by a missile and not a plane? Thierry Meyssan has also claimed that US agents have him marked for assassination . (ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan )

Your obsession with intricate conspiracy theories, and credulous acceptance of these outlandish claims of conspiracies, makes me think you could use professional help.

Hey stupid, the link has a CNN video report. Is CNN a conspiracy website now!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-09-2013, 01:34 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
(14-09-2013 02:25 AM)I and I Wrote:  
(13-09-2013 09:39 PM)BryanS Wrote:  I&I, your 'evidence' for this kidnapping scenario consists entirely of the online rantings of another madman. I was wondering What this "Voltaire Network" was, and noticed that the author of the first article, Thierry Meyssan, is also its founder. The article is written by this one individual, and all its citations/sources are...itself. The evidence for this was a staged is based entirely on speculation and interpretation from this Thierry Meyssan guy.

Now, maybe Thierry Meyssan has sources he just could not disclose on his controversial claims. Most journalists when not disclosing sources will at least give the reader some description of the source to indicate what basis the journalist has for believing them. Thierry Meyssan gives no such attribution for his most controversial claims.

So, I&I, you are asking us to accept opinion from Thierry Meyssan as fact. Thierry Meyssan's articles could only be a basis for evidence if we considered him the direct source of this information and that he somehow has some direct knowledge of the events. His credibility is relevant to evaluating his claims. Would it surprise anyone that Thierry Meyssan claims that the 911 attacks were actually caused by "the US military industrial complex in order to impose a military regime". And that the Pentagon attack was caused by a missile and not a plane? Thierry Meyssan has also claimed that US agents have him marked for assassination . (ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan )

Your obsession with intricate conspiracy theories, and credulous acceptance of these outlandish claims of conspiracies, makes me think you could use professional help.

Hey stupid, the link has a CNN video report. Is CNN a conspiracy website now!

I was responding to the OP. But your CNN link has nothing to do with your conspiracy theory that a bunch of people were kidnapped, gassed, and then used as props for a staged attack. It only goes as far as saying that a hospital visited by this reporter states that those he interviewed only reported injuries from conventional munitions.

You should not that if you search for "Chemical Attack Frederik Pleitgen" on youtube, you will find a lot of stories from Mr Pleitgen, the reporter that had been edited into your youtube post. I would like to find the actual unedited video. Most of his other videos are consistent with the point of view in the edited version you linked to, but also discloses that he is operating within government controlled areas, hospitals, with government escorts, etc. These disclosures are important when evaluating the reporting. Youtube doesn't have to include these disclosures, but in numerous other reports from this same reporter, he does disclose this. As the only US journalist allowed to operate on the ground, this reporter is seeing the evidence that the Syrian government allows him to see. That doesn't make his reporting wrong, but it does provide needed context.

And you haven't addressed providing evidence for your kidnap claims. I stand by my statement that I think you need professional help.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-09-2013, 03:22 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
And you haven't provided any evidence and neither has any US official that Assad used chemical weapons on his people.

Since when did it become a conspiracy theory to believe that alqaeda are mass murdering thugs? Bryan, look at your fucking self, the US is supporting alqaeda and not as condemning of alqaeda and now the sheep follow along, so people like you are defending alqaeda. Just a few years ago if someone told you that alqaeda kidnapped people then killed them you wouldn't have been so inquisitive for evidence. but now that uncle sam jazzed in your mouth that assad must go "alqaeda in syria killed kids? where is the evidence, I need to investigate before I come to a conclusion about thesse guys."

Mother fucking stupid.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-09-2013, 04:39 PM
RE: Children in chemical attack video were kidnapped by rebels then killed later.
(14-09-2013 03:22 PM)I and I Wrote:  And you haven't provided any evidence and neither has any US official that Assad used chemical weapons on his people.

Since when did it become a conspiracy theory to believe that alqaeda are mass murdering thugs? Bryan, look at your fucking self, the US is supporting alqaeda and not as condemning of alqaeda and now the sheep follow along, so people like you are defending alqaeda. Just a few years ago if someone told you that alqaeda kidnapped people then killed them you wouldn't have been so inquisitive for evidence. but now that uncle sam jazzed in your mouth that assad must go "alqaeda in syria killed kids? where is the evidence, I need to investigate before I come to a conclusion about thesse guys."

Mother fucking stupid.

Look for any claim where I said Assad was personally responsible for ordering the chemical attacks. Good luck hunting for that.

From the tone of your reply, I can tell you have difficulties controlling yourself. Really, you are one paranoid, sick individual.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: