Comfort vs Hovind
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
28-02-2013, 03:16 AM
Comfort vs Hovind
Hopefully this is the right area for this...

But anyways, Ray Comfort vs. Kent Hovind.

Bananaman vs Dr. Dino

Whose arguments are dumber? Who's the biggest fraud? And above all, who's funnier?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2013, 05:09 AM (This post was last modified: 28-02-2013 05:16 AM by Free Thought.)
RE: Comfort vs Hovind
It's no contest.


The prize goes to:

[Image: CCznK4k.jpg]


Comfort's apologetics, from what I've seen, is based almost entirely dishonest bending of definitions and bastardisations of things like evolution which could be best described as Straw Men and Appeal to Ridicule fallacies put into a car compactor and forced into a convenient cube.

Hovind is just plain stupid and dishonest, preying on children and impressionable, unfortunately stupid adults.

They are equally dumb, I think Hovind was the bigger fraud for a time. Then the Us government found him out. Comfort is funnier, but just as frustrating.

A single action is worth more than the words it takes to describe it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Free Thought's post
28-02-2013, 08:10 AM
RE: Comfort vs Hovind
I don't even want to think about that.

It's like asking me if I'd rather be eaten alive or burned alive. Both are going to royally suck. No

[Image: h8m4.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like LostLocke's post
28-02-2013, 08:29 AM
RE: Comfort vs Hovind
Hovind pretends to be an expert on science and parades about as if he is some philosopher with a secret. He tricks people by making them think he is spewing out knowledge when he is doing nothing more than prattling off opinions based on speculation, hearsay, and a misunderstanding of science.

Comfort is almost as bad. He will at least take on the opposing side in debates but with Kirk Cameron at his side, he is more marketable. Meaning that he gets his message of stupid out to more people. Comfort comes with Cameron by default, they are an inseparable douche duo. I would say Comfort was not as bad, except for the copies of "On the Origin of Species" they handed out for free on college campuses where he wrote an unofficial intro to it.

The choice between a turd sandwich and a giant douche is one I would rather not make. I guess Comfort is worse because he comes with Cameron and Hovind's ideas can be dealt with by elementary school kids. This is his son, but still.

Is this place still a shithole run by a dumbass calvinist?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: