Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
|
|
|
12-03-2016, 06:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(11-03-2016 10:59 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:I find this utterly hilarious. You expect me to believe a gay guy calling me dear and sweetie has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is gay?(11-03-2016 05:46 PM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: It's used in conversations by opposing genders. It's what led me to believe you had feminine tendencies and my hunch turned out to be correct. I'm making a poll. Let's see what everyone thinks. |
||||
12-03-2016, 06:29 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote:(11-03-2016 10:59 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote: No kidding, genius. But not exclusively.I find this utterly hilarious. You expect me to believe a gay guy calling me dear and sweetie has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is gay? Depends. Is he using it to be an asshole, is he using it sarcastically, or is he using it with earnest endearment? Also, a woman could also use that word in all of those exact same ways (and more) to a man, or to another woman for that matter. So yeah, it really has nothing to do with the fact that he's gay. The only thing that would change is if he used it in an honestly endearing way because he found you to be genuinely attractive, as opposed to a straight man pretending to do so for whatever reason. That's it. The straight dude could say it in the exact same way. Actors get paid to do this. So the important determining factor here is the context of the usage, and not the sexual preference of the 'gay guy'. (12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: It's what led me to believe you had feminine tendencies and my hunch turned out to be correct. Wait, what? Feminine tendencies? You have idiotic tendencies, given your forums posts. Wonder how long it'll take all of us to verify that. Wait, it's already done? Hot damn! Isn't armchair psychology great!? (12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: I'm making a poll. Let's see what everyone thinks. ![]() ![]() |
||||
![]() |
12-03-2016, 06:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(11-03-2016 10:01 PM)WhiskeyDebates Wrote:To represent does not mean to imply. If you are going to use he English language to win an argument at least use it honestly.(10-03-2016 11:44 PM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/plagiarismI'd ask if you were serious but I'd be wasting my time. I've already explained this what must be a half a dozen times or more now, still glutton for punishment that I am I'll do it again and I'll be as through as I possibly can. If you want to label someone then at least use a label that fits. I'm sure you can find some negative flaws in my character, but plagiarism just doesn't stick. Your best argument is now based on the logic that failure to place a reference link implies plagalrism because it somehow implies I represented the information as my own. Do you know the difference between represent and imply? Dictionary.com: represent [rep-ri-zent] Spell Syllables Synonyms Examples Word Origin See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com verb (used with object) 1. to serve to express, designate, stand for, or denote, as a word, symbol, or the like does; symbolize: In this painting the cat represents evil and the bird, good. 2. to express or designate by some term, character, symbol, or the like: to represent musical sounds by notes. 3. to stand or act in the place of, as a substitute, proxy, or agent does: He represents the company in Boston. 4. to speak and act for by delegated authority: to represent one's government in a foreign country. 5. to act for or in behalf of (a constituency, state, etc.) by deputed right in exercising a voice in legislation or government: He represents Chicago's third Congressional district. 6. to portray or depict; present the likeness of, as a picture does: The painting represents him as a man 22 years old. 7. to present or picture to the mind. 8. to present in words; set forth; describe; state. 9. to set forth or describe as having a particular character (usually followed by as, to be, etc.): The article represented the dictator as a benevolent despot. 10. to set forth clearly or earnestly with a view to influencing opinion or action or making protest. 11. to present, produce, or perform, as on a stage. 12. to impersonate, as in acting. 13. to serve as an example or specimen of; exemplify: a genus represented by two species. 14. to be the equivalent of; correspond to: The llama of the New World represents the camel of the Old World. No where does the definition of represent say it can be "implied". A representation cannot be implied. The words clear and official has been used to show how representation is done. There is no clear and official statement from me showing I have represented the said information as my own. You yourself have admitted it's somehow implied, due to a lack of reference. Your rebuttal to that is a disclaimer that I wrote stating the information found in posts 1 & 2 are not my official replies and in fact are plagued with errors and mistakes which I do not support. See post 4. Your rebuttal to that is that it has already been "represented" and therefore cannot be retracted. The problem with that is it has never been "represented" & the ones implying that I claim the information as my own isn't me. Let's see how well you tackle these points if you truly are good at debates: 1. Plagiarism requires representation 2. To imply does not mean to represent 3. Not doing something is not the same as representing something 4. I have never represented the information as my own It's not my fault you misunderstand the meaning of plagiarism and use it incorrectly. I would gladly admit fault if you could at least find the proper terminology for the fault. Here I will help you: I am guilty of partial copyleft infringement & it is not considered a form of plagiarism. |
||||
12-03-2016, 06:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2016 07:05 AM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: I find this utterly hilarious. You expect me to believe a gay guy calling me dear and sweetie has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is gay? Of course you do, of course you do, fool. ![]() When mommy lets you out of the basement in Podunck Junction, go check out one of the MANY places in Oceanside (or where ever) all the gay marines congregate and tell them they have "feminine tendencies". When you wake up with your concussion, black eye, and fat lip, maybe you'll rethink you idiotic, sexist stereotypes you buy into out there in Podunck, which Hollywood has convinced you are true. Fucking ignoramus. (Why is it, all (ugly) homophobic men are *just so sure* gay men would even give them a second look, when in fact, even on a desert island, they would have NOTHING to worry about ?) ![]() Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
12-03-2016, 07:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2016 07:20 AM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote:(11-03-2016 10:59 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote: No kidding, genius. But not exclusively.I find this utterly hilarious. You expect me to believe a gay guy calling me dear and sweetie has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is gay? By the way, (sorry to burst you homophobic bubble) it has NOTHING to do with you. Your not special. For a few years on TTA, it's my response of "utter contempt" as in "this one is not even worth arguing with" on TTA. You're just one in a LONG line of fools who got the "yes dear, whatever you say" from me. It means "you're hopelessly ignorant". (Hughsie actually even once threw it back at me). So, no "honey" ![]() Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
12-03-2016, 07:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2016 07:24 AM by Agnostic Shane.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 07:13 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:My bubble encompasses all straight guys.(12-03-2016 06:12 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: I find this utterly hilarious. You expect me to believe a gay guy calling me dear and sweetie has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he is gay? You could burst our bubble/nuts (pun intended) by showing me how many female posters you have called "sweetie", "dear" & "honey" in the past 5 years. That should shut me up for quite some time. Total replies per female user/ feminine insults Ratio against Total replies per male user/ feminine insults |
||||
12-03-2016, 07:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2016 07:27 AM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 07:19 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote:(12-03-2016 07:13 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: By the way, (sorry to burst you homophobic bubble) it has NOTHING to do with you. For a few years on TTA, it's my response of "utter contempt" as in "this one is not even worth arguing with" on TTA. You're just one in a LONG line of fools who got the "yes dear, whatever you say" from me. It means "you're hopelessly ignorant". (Hughsie actually even once threw it back at me). So, no "honey"My bubble encompasses all straight guys. LMAO. We do get that you are SO fucking clueless that you would think that. Unlike you, I don't divide the world into black and white stereotypes by gender. ![]() How about you tell us what "feminine tendencies" are, Mr. Creepy Man Who Hugs People WAY Too Much. Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
12-03-2016, 07:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2016 07:31 AM by Agnostic Shane.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 07:22 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:(12-03-2016 07:19 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: My bubble encompasses all straight guys. Avoiding the opportunity to prove me wrong i see. It's understandable considering that you always fail. Total single replies per female user/ feminine insults Ratio against Total single replies per male user/ feminine insults You are right though, I stopped sending those hugs after you confirmed you were gay. Didn't want you to get the wrong impressions. So are you saying Peebothol is also creepy considering he has sent me so many hugs? Or does it only apply to people you call sweetie/dear/honey? |
||||
12-03-2016, 07:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 07:26 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote:(12-03-2016 07:22 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: LMAO. You proved yourself wrong .... "girlfriend". ![]() Fucking clueless ignoramus Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
12-03-2016, 07:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Commentary on Paleophyte and Agnostic Shane
(12-03-2016 07:31 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:Expected as much from you.(12-03-2016 07:26 AM)Agnostic Shane Wrote: Avoiding the opportunity to prove me wrong i see. It's understandable considering that you always fail. Never was able to prove anything you say past the fact that you always think you are right. At least even when I think I am mostly right, I still give others the opportunity to prove me wrong. Your just plain stubborn. I think you and I have 2 different concepts of the word Homphobic. You seem to be using it incorrectly quite often. When your finished describing what you think a Homphobic is I'm sure you can label yourself a Hugaphobic with the very same logic. |
||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)