Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
02-04-2012, 05:57 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
(02-04-2012 07:26 AM)mysticjbyrd Wrote:  Have you guys actually watched Faux News? If so, then why is this even shocking? This isn't far from what the Republicans actually base their platform on.

But even Fox news won't run 75% of this bunk.

"IN THRUST WE TRUST"

"We were conservative Jews and that meant we obeyed God's Commandments until His rules became a royal pain in the ass."

- Joel Chastnoff, The 188th Crybaby Brigade
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-04-2012, 11:04 AM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
(02-04-2012 05:38 PM)itsacow Wrote:  My brain.... hurts.



Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
04-04-2012, 12:26 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
Conservapedia on Hitler- AN EVOLUTIONIST ATHEIST SOCIALIST NAZI WHO SUPPORTS GAY RIGHTS

That's what they have written about him,i'm not even making this up.

The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
-Karl Marx


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-04-2012, 03:13 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
(04-04-2012 12:26 PM)znk666 Wrote:  Conservapedia on Hitler...WHO SUPPORTS GAY RIGHTS

...which is why he tried to rid the world of them...

No
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-04-2012, 04:07 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
I was under the impression that Conservepedia was run by Stephen Colbert.

[Image: 4833fa13.jpg]
Poonjab
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-04-2012, 04:09 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
(04-04-2012 04:07 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  I was under the impression that Conservepedia was run by Stephen Colbert.
I can't view it as anything but satire. It's just impossible for someone to create it and be serious about it. Isn't it?

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-04-2012, 04:47 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
How i feel reading the lies and ignorance that is conservapedia.

[Image: WTFwasthat.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like FSM_scot's post
04-04-2012, 06:49 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
I'm going to use it as a source in the next paper I write... a source to prove the atrocities of the Right I mean.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-04-2012, 06:57 PM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
(04-04-2012 04:47 PM)FSM_scot Wrote:  How i feel reading the lies and ignorance that is conservapedia.

[Image: WTFwasthat.gif]
Yeah, like that.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
05-04-2012, 11:09 AM
RE: Conservapedia - The Queen Mother of Right Wing Batshit
One of the most ridiculous features of the site is the Conservative Bible Project.

From Wilipedia

"Conservapedia hosts the "Conservative Bible Project", a project aiming to rewrite the English translation of the Bible in order to remove terms described as "liberal bias". The project intends to remove sections of the Bible which are judged by Conservapedia's founder to be later liberal additions. These include the story of the adulteress in the Gospel of John in which Jesus declares "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone". The project also intends to remove Jesus's prayer on the cross, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing", since it appears only in the Gospel of Luke and since, according to Schlafly, "the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible". The adulteress story and the "forgive them" line are missing from many early manuscripts, and many modern textual scholars consider that they are not authentic parts of the gospels, though possibly historically valid.
The Bible project has met with extensive criticism. Rod Dreher, a conservative editor and columnist, described the project as "insane hubris" and "crazy"; he further described the project as "It's like what you'd get if you crossed the Jesus Seminar with the College Republican chapter at a rural institution of Bible learnin'". Ed Morrissey, another conservative Christian writer, wrote that bending the word of God to one's own ideology makes God subservient to an ideology, rather than the other way around. Joseph Farah, editor-in-chief of WorldNetDaily, stated: "I've seen some incredibly stupid and misguided initiatives by 'conservatives' in my day, but this one takes the cake" and "There's certainly nothing 'conservative' about rewriting the Bible"."

"IN THRUST WE TRUST"

"We were conservative Jews and that meant we obeyed God's Commandments until His rules became a royal pain in the ass."

- Joel Chastnoff, The 188th Crybaby Brigade
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Carlo_The_Bugsmasher_Driver's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: