Creation Science Hall of Fame
|
|
|
26-09-2012, 12:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(20-09-2012 06:24 AM)Chas Wrote: In Latin, the plural of forum is fora. Like maximum/maxima, minimum/minima, bellum/bella, etc. Recte, sed declinatio illa secunda est, non tertia. Religious disputes are like arguments in a madhouse over which inmate really is Napoleon. |
||||
26-09-2012, 03:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(26-09-2012 12:19 PM)cufflink Wrote:(20-09-2012 06:24 AM)Chas Wrote: In Latin, the plural of forum is fora. Like maximum/maxima, minimum/minima, bellum/bella, etc. Yes, thanks. The confusing thing is that there are 3rd declension nouns ending -um. And are neuter nouns of first declension adjectives declined 2nd or 3rd? e.g. maximus/maximum. It's been a lot of years since I took Latin. And, no, it was not widely spoken at the time. ![]() Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
26-09-2012, 03:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
Lading meizhou shi dun
E 2 = (mc 2)2 + (pc )2 614C → 714N + e– + ̅νe 2 K(s) + 2 H2O(l) → 2 KOH(aq) + H2 (g) + 196 kJ/mol It works, bitches. |
||||
26-09-2012, 05:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(26-09-2012 03:35 PM)Chas Wrote: The confusing thing is that there are 3rd declension nouns ending -um. Hmm. ![]() I wonder, though, if you're thinking of the 3rd declension nouns in -us, like corpus, corporis . . . ? I believe those are all neuter. So it's Hoc est enim corpus meum, not *corpus meus. In -us/-a/-um adjectives, the neuter one is declined 2nd. Quote:It's been a lot of years since I took Latin. Same here. Quote:And, no, it was not widely spoken at the time. Getting the jump on Erxy, eh? ![]() Religious disputes are like arguments in a madhouse over which inmate really is Napoleon. |
||||
![]() |
26-09-2012, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(26-09-2012 03:42 PM)Phaedrus Wrote: Lading meizhou shi dun Bu shi. Lading hen youyong. Keshi zai zheli Zhongwen bi Lading zhongyao. Religious disputes are like arguments in a madhouse over which inmate really is Napoleon. |
||||
26-09-2012, 05:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(26-09-2012 05:17 PM)cufflink Wrote:Quote:It's been a lot of years since I took Latin. Exactly. ![]() Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
26-09-2012, 06:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
Member of the Cult of Reason
Bitcion:1DNeQMswMdvx4xLPP6qNE7RkeTwXGC7Bzp
The atheist is a man who destroys the imaginary things which afflict the human race, and so leads men back to nature, to experience and to reason. -Baron d'Holbach- |
||||
09-01-2013, 02:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2013 02:08 AM by EvolutionKills.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
(26-09-2012 05:10 AM)Karl Wrote: I saw one the other day on you tube! I remember that one, and found it for you! This is the same guy that does the 'Golden Crocoduck Awards' for creationist stupidity, of which Eric Hovind (Kent Hovind's son) is the most recent recipient. In this video, a Dr. Richard Kent claims that small nostrils combined with a change in oxygen levels led to dinosaur's nostrils catching on fire and becoming the basis for dragon myths.. I wish I was making this up... Epic Creationist Fails of Our Time #2 - potholer54 ![]() |
||||
![]() |
15-01-2013, 08:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Creation Science Hall of Fame
so..much ....quote mining
|
||||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)