Creationist arguments against genetics
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
16-05-2013, 12:39 AM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics



Member of the Cult of Reason

The atheist is a man who destroys the imaginary things which afflict the human race, and so leads men back to nature, to experience and to reason.
-Baron d'Holbach-
Bitcion:1DNeQMswMdvx4xLPP6qNE7RkeTwXGC7Bzp
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like fstratzero's post
16-05-2013, 01:44 AM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics
The Real Creationist Argument against Evolution and genetics.

[Image: 28-fingers-in-ears.jpg]

[Image: Hitchhikersguide_zps7678fbae.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Revenant77x's post
16-05-2013, 08:20 AM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics
(15-05-2013 09:10 AM)PleaseJesus Wrote:  Well, the "Christian" who wrote that is obviously stupid. A 100% match means we are the same species and we are chimpanzees and they are human.

Shame none of you noticed that. Confused

Wait a minute.... Really? "A 100% match means we are the same species"? Ummm... A 100% match would mean they are our (or we are their) clones!! Even identical twin have a minor variance. Or am I missing something here?

“My view is that if your philosophy is not unsettled daily then you are blind to all the universe has to offer.”
― Neil deGrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-05-2013, 01:42 PM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics
(16-05-2013 12:39 AM)fstratzero Wrote:  


Thanks for posting this. Genetics is not one of my strong suits.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-05-2013, 01:17 PM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics
Quote:Wait a minute.... Really? "A 100% match means we are the same species"? Ummm... A 100% match would mean they are our (or we are their) clones!! Even identical twin have a minor variance. Or am I missing something here?

I took 100% as the phenotype and not an exact match. I was being facetious. Thanks.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-05-2013, 01:44 PM
RE: Creationist arguments against genetics
Haven't watched frat's video yet, don't know if this is in it. But I love this guy so I had to post.




"It's a most distressing affliction to have a sentimental heart and a skeptical mind.”
― نجيب محفوظ, Sugar Street
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  does anyother creationist have a disclaimer ? Ace 5 111 14-07-2014 03:19 PM
Last Post: Reltzik
  Index to Creationist Claims Ace 7 131 12-07-2014 11:45 PM
Last Post: Ace
  Arguments to convince religious people Mozart Link 11 290 02-07-2014 02:22 AM
Last Post: JONES
  Why God can not exist - logical arguments mlecyq 70 1,466 24-06-2014 09:01 PM
Last Post: Taqiyya Mockingbird
  Commonly Used Debate Arguments for Dummies Zephony 111 14,078 21-06-2014 12:20 PM
Last Post: Forthright Atheist
  The Christians arguments for religion TrainWreck 27 425 13-06-2014 01:01 AM
Last Post: Taqiyya Mockingbird
  Using theist arguments to 'prove' God does not exist Mathilda 30 573 01-06-2014 03:29 PM
Last Post: Metazoa Zeke
Forum Jump: