Crooked Melania
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-07-2016, 05:02 PM
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 04:40 PM)Born Again Pagan Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 01:21 PM)onlinebiker Wrote:  Dude --- if it's "Your guy" in office -- he/she could rape an entire troop of girl scouts, roll up a joint using the Constitution as a rolling paper, and take a shit in the middle of the Capital Rotunda -- and the typical party loyalist will use the most convoluted logic to justify, or excuse the behavior....................

The retard has already proudly proclaimed that he could shoot someone on the street in New York and nobody would care. So what for a bit of plagiarism by his old lady?

Yup....

The first thing that should clue you that a person is unsuited for public office???

They're trying to get the job.....

.......................................

The difference between prayer and masturbation - is when a guy is through masturbating - he has something to show for his efforts.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes onlinebiker's post
19-07-2016, 05:07 PM
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 05:02 PM)KUSA Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 01:01 PM)dancefortwo Wrote:  They shouldn't have asked him any personal questions concerning his sex life in the first place. What business was it of theirs.

I agree. I mean what was Bill to do? He had an ugly hag for a wife and needed a little nookie. Nobody's business.

He probably didn't even notice the blowjob. He was just getting the cigar ready to smoke. You don't just clip the tip and light it up. That's for Philistines.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
19-07-2016, 05:12 PM
RE: Crooked Melania
If Bill Clinton had said "Yeah -- I banged an intern... In the Oval Office...... And I used a cigar for a dildo --- you gotta problem with it?" --- I would have due respect for the guy.....

But -- he stared straight into the camera -- pointed his finger at us --- and LIED to our faces.........................


Fuck him..............

If you can't own it -- don't buy it.....

.......................................

The difference between prayer and masturbation - is when a guy is through masturbating - he has something to show for his efforts.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes onlinebiker's post
19-07-2016, 05:18 PM
Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 05:07 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  He probably didn't even notice the blowjob. He was just getting the cigar ready to smoke. You don't just clip the tip and light it up. That's for Philistines.

Never thought of it like that. LOL!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes KUSA's post
19-07-2016, 06:26 PM
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 01:16 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 01:09 PM)dancefortwo Wrote:  So let's remove the statues and historical monuments to all the presidents that have had affairs. Let's erase them from the history books. Impeach them in absentia. There wouldn't be many presidents left. Like I said. It was none of their damn business and they shouldn't have asked the question in the first place. Bunch of nosey, sex obsessed, fucked up, religious zealots.

Sometime Men in power harass women, but if we like their ideology, we can give them a pass. If they commit additional crimes to cover up their harassment we will excuse that too.

The above is what the people who brainwashed you want.


Honey, most of the presidents of the US had affairs, with the exception of maybe Harry Truman and a couple others. If you don't know this then you've been brainwashed to believe in cherry tree myths along with your silly Jesus crap.

Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors.... on Donald J. Trump:

He is deformed, crooked, old, and sere,
Ill-fac’d, worse bodied, shapeless every where;
Vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind,
Stigmatical in making, worse in mind.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like dancefortwo's post
19-07-2016, 07:06 PM
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 01:26 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  It is possible that they deliberately copied Michelle Obama's speech thinking nobody would notice, but I think the probability of that being true is less than it being an innocent coincidence or a deliberate attempt to generate publicity.

Trump would want a lot of publicity around Melania. She is beautiful. Hilary is ugly. America wants beautiful leaders. Christie, Newt, they never had a chance at being VP because they are fat and ugly. Homely doesn't win elections.

Oddly enough, no. At the moment, Melania is one of the least popular spouses of a candidate in a very long time. Her Net Favorability is -4.

---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-07-2016, 01:10 AM (This post was last modified: 20-07-2016 01:13 AM by Thumpalumpacus.)
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 12:07 PM)Vosur Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 09:44 AM)Dom Wrote:  I still get a chuckle out of that - impeach a guy because he got a blow job. Priceless!

You two realize that Bill Clinton was going to be impeached because he lied under oath, not because he had an affair, right? Is lying to a grand jury suddenly not a serious crime anymore when it's committed by a Democrat? Consider

Given that he wasn't convicted, asserting that he did in fact lie under oath seems a bit of a stretch. It's not like that particular Senate was friendly to him; if they had the goods, they would have pulled the trigger.

The vote was largely along party divide. Every Democrat voted not-guilty on the perjury charge to which you refer, and most Republicans voted guilty. However, ten Repubilicans crossed party lines and voted not-guilty, giving the not-guilty result a five-vote margin.

In other words, if you take partisanship out of the vote, you still have presumably-objective -- or even antagonistic, politically -- jurists finding for the defendant.

Plainly asserting, then, that he "lied under oath", seems to contradict the judgement of the people who actually ruled on the case, and who could have politically benefitted from casting a guilty vote yet refused to do so.


Republican Senators who voted not-guilty:

John H. Chafee (R-Rhode Island)
Susan Collins (R-Maine)
Slade Gorton (R-Washington)
James M. Jeffords (R-Vermont)
Richard C. Shelby (R-Alabama)
Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine)
Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania)
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)
Fred Thompson (R-Tennessee)
John W. Warner (R-Virginia)

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1...nate.vote/

Not one Democrat crossed party lines to vote guilty, but these ten Republicans did to vote not-guilty. Yet you say he committed perjury.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-07-2016, 02:53 AM
RE: Crooked Melania
(20-07-2016 01:10 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  Not one Democrat crossed party lines to vote guilty, but these ten Republicans did to vote not-guilty. Yet you say he committed perjury.

Although the Senate chose not to convict him, he was fined $25000 and his license to practice law in Arkansas was suspended for 5 years. He was also disbarred from arguing before the Supreme Court.

But if you read the articles of impeachment, no where does it say they were impeaching him because he got a blow job.

Even if all 10 republicans voted for impeachment, Clinton still would not have been convicted because all the democrats lined up behind him and gave him a pass on both his harassment of women, and his attempt to usurp justice.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-07-2016, 04:42 AM
RE: Crooked Melania
(19-07-2016 01:26 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 01:14 AM)DLJ Wrote:  OMSelf!

I was just formulating something about ... what's the betting that they'd come out with a "if the shoe was on the other foot" argument or a "did it on purpose" argument or some such lame-arsed excuse? Then I refreshed the page and read HJ's post.

:mind blown:

Big Grin

It is possible that they deliberately copied Michelle Obama's speech thinking nobody would notice, but I think the probability of that being true is less than it being an innocent coincidence or a deliberate attempt to generate publicity.

Trump would want a lot of publicity around Melania. She is beautiful. Hilary is ugly. America wants beautiful leaders. Christie, Newt, they never had a chance at being VP because they are fat and ugly. Homely doesn't win elections.

Yah but have you seen her ass, it sticks out like two little boys fighting in a sack Yes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-07-2016, 04:53 AM
RE: Crooked Melania
(20-07-2016 01:10 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  
(19-07-2016 12:07 PM)Vosur Wrote:  You two realize that Bill Clinton was going to be impeached because he lied under oath, not because he had an affair, right? Is lying to a grand jury suddenly not a serious crime anymore when it's committed by a Democrat? Consider

Given that he wasn't convicted, asserting that he did in fact lie under oath seems a bit of a stretch. It's not like that particular Senate was friendly to him; if they had the goods, they would have pulled the trigger.

The vote was largely along party divide. Every Democrat voted not-guilty on the perjury charge to which you refer, and most Republicans voted guilty. However, ten Repubilicans crossed party lines and voted not-guilty, giving the not-guilty result a five-vote margin.

In other words, if you take partisanship out of the vote, you still have presumably-objective -- or even antagonistic, politically -- jurists finding for the defendant.

Plainly asserting, then, that he "lied under oath", seems to contradict the judgement of the people who actually ruled on the case, and who could have politically benefitted from casting a guilty vote yet refused to do so.


Republican Senators who voted not-guilty:

John H. Chafee (R-Rhode Island)
Susan Collins (R-Maine)
Slade Gorton (R-Washington)
James M. Jeffords (R-Vermont)
Richard C. Shelby (R-Alabama)
Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine)
Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania)
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)
Fred Thompson (R-Tennessee)
John W. Warner (R-Virginia)

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1...nate.vote/

Not one Democrat crossed party lines to vote guilty, but these ten Republicans did to vote not-guilty. Yet you say he committed perjury.
"A bit of a stretch"? Really? It's a bit of a stretch to suggest that Bill Clinton was lying when he claimed that he did not have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky even though she blew him almost a dozen times? Facepalm

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: