DNA? We don't need no stinkin' DNA.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-10-2016, 02:43 AM
DNA? We don't need no stinkin' DNA.
"They admitted they were guilty. The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty. The fact that that case was settled with so much evidence against them is outrageous. And the woman, so badly injured, will never be the same." - Trump this Friday on the 2002 exoneration of the Central Park based on DNA evidence.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
08-10-2016, 02:53 AM
RE: DNA? We don't need no stinkin' DNA.
(08-10-2016 02:43 AM)GirlyMan Wrote:  "They admitted they were guilty. The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty. The fact that that case was settled with so much evidence against them is outrageous. And the woman, so badly injured, will never be the same." - Trump this Friday on the 2002 exoneration of the Central Park based on DNA evidence.


Don't you know Girly, the police are incapable of coercing false confessions? Rolleyes

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes EvolutionKills's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: