David, The Theist
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 5 Votes - 2.6 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
18-10-2012, 01:11 PM
RE: David, The Theist
Umm... Jesus himself talks about hell ? Maybe if I read the links...
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-10-2012, 01:14 PM
RE: David, The Theist
(18-10-2012 07:37 AM)DLJ Wrote:  Welcome, David, The Theist.
I am much more of an idefinite article myself... David, ATheist... but DLJ to my friends.

Thanks for the welcome.

(18-10-2012 07:37 AM)DLJ Wrote:  I must say what a resounding pleasure it is to meet here a theist who can actually string a grammatically correct sentence together (with a couple of minor exceptions) given the recent drive-by theist illiterates we have witnessed recently.

Only a couple minor exceptions? Either I'm doing a great deal better than usual or you haven't been paying enough attention, but I'll accept that. Thanks.

(18-10-2012 07:37 AM)DLJ Wrote:  This is very true, btw, it certainly applies to many of my Philippian (filipina) friends. Good food and fun times... definitely something to be encouraged.

Yes, so long as we don't get too carried away. If I don't use some moderation the only way I'm going to get carried away is in a crane. Drooling
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-10-2012, 01:16 PM
RE: David, The Theist
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like morondog's post
18-10-2012, 01:37 PM
RE: David, The Theist
(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  I have debated thousands of atheists and theists online since 1996.

We're talking about scholars. Your "20 years" and "thousands" doesn't scare me. Your implication that 4/thousands are good enough for you, does not impress me.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  If I subscribed to the most prestigious academic institution they would probably tell me that the soul is immortal due to the influence of Greek philosophy in Jewish thinking about the time of Alexander the Great, and I read Ezekiel 18:4 that plainly says that the soul dies. Then some scholars disagree, noting the aforementioned influence.

We're not talking about souls yet. We're still talking "in general". No one said anything about "souls". However your presumption that there is any sort of "consensus" in mainline centers of academia on anything, is extremely presumptuous, AND that it would be reflected in a journal.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  Yes. As a deity. And why not? The term atheism itself is nonsensical because anything and anyone can be a god. A deity.

I see. Then we DO have nothing to discuss. YOU said you were a theist. That implies you have a deity. I see you have "all possible deities". THAT is not the Biblical god. So I assume you don't even know who, or what your god is. The position of atheist, that all gods seen so far, as seen so far, are dismissed, IS NOT THE SAME, and dismissal is not belief. That's typical theist crap.

Moses was NOT a real person. Since you say that, I see also we have nothing to discuss. There is no proof of Moses. Next, you'll be telling me he wrote the Pentateuch. Hahahaha.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  How many gods were mentioned by the Bible? What about Moses and the Judges of Israel, who were real people that existed. The atheist has to perform the intellectual gymnastics when it comes to an understanding of deity.

Nope. very easy. They're all crap, and all dismissed. Very simple.

Don't quote your scripture to atheists. It's circular reassoning. You must provide EXTERNAL *evidence* here. Scripture is "proof" of nothing. Zero. Nada. Zilch.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  Lets say a man makes his way across the open plains near death. Cold, hungry and tired. No fuel for lighting a fire for protection, warmth, cooking. He stumbles upon a dried pile of bison excrement. Beneath it are bugs for food. He lights it and keeps warm under the protection of the fire. He decides that this dung is his god. That dung, then, is a god.

Nope. It's still just dung.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  The Hebrew El means "Mighty One; Strong One," and is applied to Jehovah, to other gods and goddesses such as Baal, Satan, Molech, Dagon, Tammuz, and to men such as Moses, Jesus, and the Judges of Israel as well as angels. What about that do you object to, because you can shove it into any category or school of thought that you like, it doesn't change what the Bible says a god is.

It matters a great deal if "El" GOT there in the first place from somewhere else, and scholars know where it came from, and why, and how it got there. It didn't just "pop" up into Hebrew culture. I am not "confusing anything with anything. The origins are what one of my PhD theses is being done on. You pick the wrong dude to tell who is confusing what, here. Sorry. Don't patronize me with your "common mistake" bullshit.

(18-10-2012 02:27 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  You are no theist sir. I don't know what you are, but you don't get to redefine words for your personal use, AND expect that they will have meaning to others.

Nope. YOU came here, saying YOU were a theist. We dismiss them all. Define yours, or STFU. Apparently you can't, even while maintaining you found truth in the Bible with the Biblical "god", (which was NOT a "pantheist" god). It changed a few times, but Yahweh is not Jehovah, and "any greater power" is NOT god, in the Bible.

The Bible is "mythology". But you don't even know what that means, in a non pejorative sense. It was, however assembled by humans who assembled it for very, and ONLY human reasons, which you NEED, (as in Psychology), NEED to slap your external meaning, and interpretation on, and then make ultimate claims about.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  No specific scholar. The Documentary Hypothesis is really poor scholarship for someone so obsessed with academia.

Hahahahaha. For someone who is "self-taught" dismissing the Documentary Hypothesis as "poor scholarship" is hilariously fatuous, and arrogant. It's like a grade schooler telling Einstein, "you're really dumb". Scholarship has come a LONG way from Wellhausen, and they are now based very much on Archaeology. "Quite the contrary" / sarcasm

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  You are an intellectual who wants to believe the Bible is myth.

Damn right. I know it's a myth. No way you can see the mythic origins and buy into the crap as real.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  An exception to the community? I haven't been baptized, because who would baptize me? Apostate Christendom? Part of my method for not being led astray into heresy is avoiding organized religion and an over emphasis of the scholarly.

Bwahaha. That's what they all say.
Just like ole Joe Smith.

(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  I said that it was my opinion and that I may be wrong and that it didn't really matter because ultimately it has to do with sin.

It does matter. "Sin" involves moral choice. If it's not a choice, it's not a sin. Typical Biblical theist who does not know that the Garden myth, (Adam and Eve), is NOT about "sin". and "fall", but about "Chaos and Order", (taken from it's pre-Hebrew origins, which, apparently, your "self-teaching" has not discovered yet). Good luck.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
"And you quit footing the bill for these nations that are oil rich - we're paying for some of their *squirmishes* that have been going on for centuries" - Sarah Palin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 6 users Like Bucky Ball's post
18-10-2012, 01:46 PM
RE: David, The Theist
Let me just reiterate, David...

As you can see from Bucky, you're not going to be able to give vague, wordy answers and think that the community is just going to go, "Ohhh okay".

You're not really answering questions as much as posting links to your site. We asked you a question, you're supposed to answer it; not post us a link so we have to fish around to try and find a semblance of an answer that we were looking for.

Giving a straight answer isn't hard... just... answer the question.

Also, as Bucky said, don't play the "common misconception" card. We're all pretty learned here, and in fact, we have some that are working on their PhD and are actual scholars in their field.

The fact that I see some problems with your Greek and Hebrew (in the freewill link) shows that you aren't immune to "common misconceptions" either. As your Greek is not correct.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like kingschosen's post
18-10-2012, 01:56 PM (This post was last modified: 18-10-2012 02:00 PM by Vosur.)
RE: David, The Theist
Welcome to TTA. I'm sure that we'll have the opportunity to have a discussion in the near future.

Until then, I have a question for you: Do you care to elaborate on your religious beliefs?

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Vosur's post
18-10-2012, 01:59 PM
RE: David, The Theist
Careful careful Smile Don't let's scare him away.

The links were pretty good IMO. Need Bucky to comment on the idea that hell is a pagan concept. Still wanna know if God wants to burn people though 'cos I though the pit of doom in revelations was pretty explicit.

The Theist sirrah, you have been accused of your personal Greek being up the pole, how do you plead?

Any case, if God's a nice guy and *doesn't* care, and since he's not inclined to answer in any non-ambiguous way, is there any reason to worship him at all?

By the way, you said something about the definition of worship. I mean you know, let us pray, hallelujah, the Lord has blessed him, thank you Jesus for the lovely chow which not everyone gets *despite you being an omnipotent bastard*. That kinda worship.

*Do you* so worship, or have you found some other fancy definition, since there's nothing theists seem to love doing other than redefining commonly understood words within very narrow limits set by themselves Wink
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
18-10-2012, 02:15 PM
RE: David, The Theist
I'm actually researching the idea of hell... and what the Bible says about it... so, we'll see what I get from it.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-10-2012, 02:33 PM
RE: David, The Theist
(18-10-2012 02:15 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  I'm actually researching the idea of hell... and what the Bible says about it... so, we'll see what I get from it.

Check out the trash pile outside ancient Jerusalem. It was always on fire. Full of every possible thing, including animal remains. It was called *Gehenna*.
Sound familiar. Consider

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
"And you quit footing the bill for these nations that are oil rich - we're paying for some of their *squirmishes* that have been going on for centuries" - Sarah Palin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post
18-10-2012, 02:37 PM
RE: David, The Theist
(18-10-2012 12:42 PM)The Theist Wrote:  Yes. As a deity. And why not? The term atheism itself is nonsensical because anything and anyone can be a god. A deity.
I think there's a little bit of confusion on your part. The definitions of words change over time and their meaning is dependant on the context in which they are used, as well as on the cultural background of the person who is using them. In the case of atheism (a lack of belief in gods) the term "god" refers to a supernatural deity.

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: