Denouncing Pseudo-Christian Myths
Post Reply
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
04-03-2013, 01:26 PM
Denouncing Pseudo-Christian Myths
I recently started the book series, “Denouncing Pseudo-Christian Myths,” and
published my first book’s Kindle edition, “Top 7 Reasons of Why God Wouldn’t
Condemn Abortion, Stem Cell Research, and Experiments on Human Embryos and
Fetuses Today,” by Andy Alder, at amazon.

I would be grateful for your reading, reviews, and comments.
In short, this is a concise informative book, highly enlightening and somewhat
entertaining. It adds a Christian perspective to the unending debate on whether
the unborn is a human being or not – and, consequently, whether its destruction
may be justified or should be condemned; whether stem cell research,
experiments on human embryos and fetuses, and cloning for medical purposes are
permitted or must be banned.

Having being a devoted Christian for more than 17 years and, as the Bible alleges,
having the mind of Christ, I wanted to understand what God might think about
these issues of great personal, medical, and scientific importance. If he walked
among us today and met a raped or single woman who had made a decision to have
an abortion procedure, would he advise her to keep the pregnancy? If he attended
a symposium and met a group of doctors and scientists, conducting experiments
on human embryos and fetuses, would he advise them to stop it?

Periodically tracking these topics, I wonder why some anti-abortion and anti-research activists
can be so obsessively adherent to their views – to the point of chasing patients,
threatening doctors, and picketing medical clinics and scientific facilities – and
what sources they draw upon to develop their arguments. Do you know the three
magic words many of them repeat again and again? God, Christian (for instance, morale,
heritage, belief), and Bible. Sometimes it makes me laughing because I am yet
to find any strong “Christian” evidence supporting their position.

As a result, the debate frequently turns out to be either a pointless
confrontation or idle talk due to inability of pro-choicers to realize that,
instead of refuting emotional and religious arguments of pro-lifers with merits
of advancing medicine and science, they must clearly show that, frankly
speaking, “Christianity-based” reasons are not truly Christian, nor are they
Biblical, nor existent at all. Personally, I believe that some religious,
social, and political FUNdamentalists, prone to conservative thinking and endorsed
by masses of genuinely ignorant people, artificially inflate and intentionally
politicize both the issue of abortion and the issue of stem cell research and
experiments on human embryos and fetuses.

This book is for any reader looking for a better understanding of the problem. Nevertheless
it is written by a Christian and from the Christian, Bible-based, perspective,
non-Christian audience is especially welcome and will be enormously benefited
from its contents. Why? Because, at times, it is so easy to get confused,
intimidated, or even speechless, listening to or personally facing the wordy
squall of emotionally charged people whose “Christian” jargon you do not
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-03-2013, 01:36 PM
RE: Denouncing Pseudo-Christian Myths
Most of us have no problem understanding Christian jargon. But we don't believe it.

No need for your book here.

And, please, no further advertising.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-03-2013, 04:20 PM (This post was last modified: 04-03-2013 04:57 PM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Denouncing Pseudo-Christian Myths
We're not confused about anything, and many of us know a lot more about your Bible than you do.
If you know the mind of your god, ask the fucker why he/she/it didn't disclose the recipe for penicillin a few hundred thousand years earlier.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein It is objectively immoral to kill innocent babies. Please stick to the guilty babies.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: