Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-09-2016, 07:00 AM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(19-09-2016 06:31 AM)theBorg Wrote:  I also often is writing the ideas in plain sentences.

Rather ironic, isn't it... Drinking Beverage

Help for the living. Hope for the dead. ~ R.G. Ingersoll

Freedom offers opportunity. Opportunity confers responsibility. Responsibility to use the freedom we enjoy wisely, honestly and humanely. ~ Noam Chomsky
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Fatbaldhobbit's post
19-09-2016, 07:11 AM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
Quote:So stop the bullying and insults, stop talking the f-words. My view of atheists and any other sinners...

You gibbering idiot.

Do you have any idea how hypocritical it is for you to tell us to stop insulting you, and then insult us in the very next sentence???
As part of your sig-line, so it appears in EVERY post you make...

[Image: godzilla-facepalm_zpsmsy5kihe.jpg]

Help for the living. Hope for the dead. ~ R.G. Ingersoll

Freedom offers opportunity. Opportunity confers responsibility. Responsibility to use the freedom we enjoy wisely, honestly and humanely. ~ Noam Chomsky
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Fatbaldhobbit's post
19-09-2016, 02:39 PM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(19-09-2016 01:18 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(18-09-2016 10:03 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  QED has just three closed loops so renormalization works quite nicely.
Let me insert the missing words:
Quote:AFTER THE RENORMALIZATION the QED STILL has "just" three INFINITE INTEGRALS FOR THE closed loops so renormalization DOES NOT workED OUT quite nicely.

Wrong. There are three closed loops prior to renormalization. That's why renormalization is necessary.

Seriously? Do you not even understand the Wikipedia page that you're misrepresenting? You have no credibility left.

---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-09-2016, 02:42 PM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(19-09-2016 02:00 AM)theBorg Wrote:  And let me repeat: hurting me you hurt only yourself. So stop the bulling and insults, stop talking the f-words.

Go fuck your self sideways with a splintery broomstick. And twice on Sundays.

---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Paleophyte's post
19-09-2016, 02:49 PM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
It's spelt as Joule

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes ClydeLee's post
21-09-2016, 07:13 AM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(19-09-2016 02:39 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  .... Wrong. There are three closed loops prior to renormalization....
Just wishful thinking! Go ask the atheist Morgan Freeman, if the atheistic community do hold and support each other with love.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
21-09-2016, 07:17 AM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(21-09-2016 07:13 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(19-09-2016 02:39 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  .... Wrong. There are three closed loops prior to renormalization....
Just wishful thinking! Go ask the atheist Morgan Freeman, if the atheistic community do hold and support each other with love.

Is it OK if I ask one of the cleaners here about stamp collecting instead?

You don't even try responding to questions do you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Mathilda's post
23-09-2016, 03:54 PM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?



Don't let those gnomes and their illusions get you down. They're just gnomes and illusions.

--Jake the Dog, Adventure Time

Alouette, je te plumerai.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-09-2016, 04:07 PM
RE: Do we really have the “jewel” of physics?
(21-09-2016 07:13 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(19-09-2016 02:39 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  .... Wrong. There are three closed loops prior to renormalization....
Just wishful thinking! Go ask the atheist Morgan Freeman, if the atheistic community do hold and support each other with love.

You are not right in the head. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: