Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?



27112013, 07:42 AM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
I'm not a physicist and don't know the maths of this subject, but I'll give it a crack. Yes, length changes with velocity as time changes with velocity. The observer at A would see the length of the B observer contract, and B would see the distance between A and C contract. Length, mass, and time all distort while the speed of light in all reference frames remains the same. The thinking is that effectively objects travelling at different velocities kind of "rotate" into the time dimension... so our threedimensional perception of them is incomplete and distorted in much the same was as any twodimensional representation of the earth is necessarily distorted in some way. The "shape" of the vacuum of space is not exactly three dimensional.
Looking at your second case we have fixed points A and C that are in the same inertial frame. The "A" observer remains fixed with respect to its frame, as does the "C" observer. B is travelling in a different reference frame travelling at 0.5c with respect to the "A/C" reference frame. As in Ozomorid's twin paradox video the "x" dimension and time are both distorted. There is no acceleration in this case so the distortion is symmetrical. The "A/C" frame seems distorted to B, and the B frame seems distorted to A and C. I'm cribbing from wikipedia here as I go[1]. According to A and C, B starts 1 light year from A and travels at 0.5c for two years to reach A at the 2 year mark. C observes the light arriving at the same time A observes B arriving. B's time dimension and x dimension are distorted as follows: t' = gamma * (t  vx / c^2) x' = gamma * (x  vt) where gamma = 1/sqrt(1(v/c)^2). At 0.5c with c = 1ly/year, gamma is 1/sqrt(1(v/c)^2) = 1/sqrt(1(0.5)^2) = 1/sqrt(0.75) ~= 1.1547 t' = 1.1547 * (t  0.5x) x' = 1.1547 * (x  0.5t) At t=0y, x=1ly in the AC frame. I'm arbitrarily choosing 5 significant figures since we are dealing with exact quantities: t' = 1.1547 * (0  0.5*1) = 0.57735y x' = 1.1547 * (1  0.5*0) = 1.1547ly At t=2y, x=0ly in the AC frame: t' = 1.1547 * (2  0.5*0) = 2.3094y x' = 1.1547 * (0  0.5*2) = 1.1547ly ie. A thinks B is travelling at 0.5c for a distance of 1ly over a period of 2 years, but B thinks they are travelling at a speed of 0.8c for a distance of 2.3ly over a period of 2.9 years. I think. I could very easily be wrong in these calculations. I have the barest understanding of the maths and could stand to be corrected By my calculation the the event of C receiving the light pulse occurs at t' = 1.1547y and x'=1.1547ly. So both the AC frame and the B frame both see the light having travelled at light speed but each think the light has travelled for a different distance and time. The ordering of events is also different. In the B frame the C light pulse observation occurred 1.7320 years after B began its journey and 1.1547 years before B arrived at point A. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_tra...figuration Give me your argument in the form of a published paper, and then we can start to talk. 

1 user Likes Hafnof's post 
27112013, 08:38 AM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
(26112013 04:57 AM)Hafnof Wrote: If I just watch it one more time I'll make sense of it. Theism is to believe what other people claim, Atheism is to ask "why should I". 

2 users Like sporehux's post 
27112013, 09:12 AM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
(27112013 07:42 AM)Hafnof Wrote: I'm not a physicist and don't know the maths of this subject, but I'll give it a crack. Yes, length changes with velocity as time changes with velocity. The observer at A would see the length of the B observer contract, and B would see the distance between A and C contract. Length, mass, and time all distort while the speed of light in all reference frames remains the same. The thinking is that effectively objects travelling at different velocities kind of "rotate" into the time dimension... so our threedimensional perception of them is incomplete and distorted in much the same was as any twodimensional representation of the earth is necessarily distorted in some way. The "shape" of the vacuum of space is not exactly three dimensional. Thanks, whether its right or not, it explains enough to realize I wasnt thinking relatively enough.. hehe I think i will go and have a lie down.. my head seems to be hurting somewhat 

1 user Likes PursuingTruth's post 
27112013, 09:24 AM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?  
27112013, 02:26 PM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
this video will help clear things up
KingsChosen is a lying douchebag 

27112013, 10:23 PM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
Yes it does.


27112013, 11:38 PM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
O, FFS, just when I get a grip on time dialation, now I have to comprehend and factor in gravityseffectontimeconfirmed
Theism is to believe what other people claim, Atheism is to ask "why should I". 

08122013, 05:59 AM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
It's general relativity that deals with gravity and its warping effect on space time. It took Einstein about 11 years to develop general relativity from special relativity (that's the length of time between him publishing the relevant seminal papers) so don't expect the maths to be particularly comprehensible
Give me your argument in the form of a published paper, and then we can start to talk. 

08122013, 01:38 PM




RE: Does time dilation contradict the constancy of light speed?
Velocity of light will remain the same because while B is observing less time he is also observing less distance.




« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)