Eric Hovind: Debating God.

[Marco Krieger]

(28-09-2012 02:58 AM)morondog Wrote:  Can't hear you, running too fast

catch him, little butterfly, catch him...
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahah..................

[Free Thought]

Nice to be back to the forums, and with a nice, hearty laugh from the get-go.

Now to wrap up some things.

(27-09-2012 08:46 PM)Near Wrote:  Email editor@thethinkingatheist.com

Thanks!

(27-09-2012 10:04 PM)Starcrash Wrote:  What subject could possibly be outside the scope of debate? Even subjects that Hovind values like creationism are debatable, despite the enormity of the evidence against it. C'mon, Eric... you should know better.

If he doesn't create a wall between his, and our, arguments by dismissing ours as pointless, he leaves his own open to consideration in his own "pointless argument" box.

(28-09-2012 01:06 AM)Apeman Wrote:  Why wasn't Kent Hovind castrated?

Would you really waste the time or energy on the petulant puss-sack?

(28-09-2012 01:29 AM)Marco Krieger Wrote:  Free Thought, you can take my word for it.
I see, you are an Old-Movies-Fundamentalist, right?
Come on, George gave his blood and sweat to made the first three movies, and he gave... ähm... he... gave a f..k to release the last three.
But its still fun to see what CG came do for you, if you running out of ideas.
And they still have there moments.
I liked Iwan Mc Gregor for his interpretation on Obi-Wan-Kenobi and i was out of the house, seeing Yoda fighting Dooku and finally the emperor.

I'm not a traditionalist or nothing, but I do tend toward the older movies, if they do lack a little lustre technologically, frankly I love Episode I, I feel it delivered on most fronts. II & III were good, but, I admit, they kinda failed to live up to their predecessors, especially if you factor in all the hype that built up in the Fandom... Otherwise, I love all the movies.

(28-09-2012 01:29 AM)Marco Krieger Wrote:  Hm, a stuff just like tar, but with more impact on the skin...
What do you think aboute Napalm?
The guy's in the states has made good experience with it in Nam, right?
But if you use napalm instead of tar, you might use steel chips from drilling instead of feathers, because feathers would just burn, the chips will meld into the flesh.
Sounds good to me.

Napalm! That never occurred to me! And the steel chips? Pure genius.

You're sure you don't work for the CIA during their "interrogations"?

I kid, I kid. But remind me to not piss you off in the future.

[aurora]

The only debates he's good at are the 'mass' type!!!

[Marco Krieger]

(30-09-2012 11:54 PM)Free Thought Wrote:  Napalm! That never occurred to me! And the steel chips? Pure genius.

You're sure you don't work for the CIA during their "interrogations"?

I kid, I kid. But remind me to not piss you off in the future.

It's working, is'nt it? I mean, in your imagination!
Ah... sometimes CIA... sometimes KGB... Mossad... there is so much work to do and so less time...
No, dont worry, it's not so easy to offend me.