Everybody's wrong.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-11-2016, 12:19 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
(11-11-2016 12:12 PM)socialistview Wrote:  Actually I know a lot about all the religions like hinduism has accounts of beings fighting in the sky.

An empty statement from an empty head. Drinking Beverage

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 12:37 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
How have I not grounded this before now? My GC fu has left me. Weeping




#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
Erhmans just a babbling man there's evidence there like the bible saying the people were evil but you still won't accept it even if its false.
https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-proble...of-canaan/
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:16 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
http://christ.org.tw/bible_and_theology/...ildren.htm
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:21 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
(11-11-2016 12:57 PM)socialistview Wrote:  Erhmans just a babbling man there's evidence there like the bible saying the people were evil but you still won't accept it even if its false.
https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-proble...of-canaan/

Why would anyone accept something that is false?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:24 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
(11-11-2016 12:57 PM)socialistview Wrote:  Erhmans just a babbling man there's evidence there like the bible saying the people were evil but you still won't accept it even if its false.
https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-proble...of-canaan/

Erhman is someone that actually knows something, you; however, are a babbling idiot.


He cites archeological evidence in that post about the implausibility of the biblical account of the conquest of Canaan, I'll cite these here:

External Verification and Archaeology. For biblical scholars, just as significant is the surviving physical evidence (or rather lack of it) for the conquest. Archaeologists have long noted that there is scant support for the kind of violent destruction of the cities of Canaan – especially the ones mentioned in Joshua. Think for a second: if one were to look for archaeological evidence, or other external verification, to support the historical narratives of Joshua, what would one look for?

References to the invasion and conquest in other written sources outside the Bible.

Evidence that there were indeed walled cities and towns in Canaan at the time.

Archaeological evidence that the cities and towns mentioned actually were destroyed at the time (Jericho, Ai, Heshbon, etc.).

Shift in cultural patterns: that is, evidence of new people taking over from other peoples of a different culture (as you get in the Americas when Europeans came over bringing with them their own culture, different from that of the native Americans).


Now rather than showing, once again, that you know nothing, I would think you would actually provide evidence in regards to the the explicit and specific points he made that cast doubt upon this account and could refute this with archeological evidence from reputable sources. If you can't provide reputable sources other than aplogist liars, then STFU!

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes TheInquisition's post
11-11-2016, 01:31 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
(11-11-2016 12:57 PM)socialistview Wrote:  Erhmans just a babbling man there's evidence there like the bible saying the people were evil but you still won't accept it even if its false.
https://ehrmanblog.org/historical-proble...of-canaan/

So are you backpedaling now? You're saying that story didn't really happen?

That's fine, so now we're talking about a fictional god in a fictional story, but that god in the fictional story is still a blood thirsty barbarian.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 02:47 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
I'm saying if it was false its exclaiming that they were sacrificing children to baal and worshipping man made carved idols but its not.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 02:49 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
So there's evidence that it was destroyed and conquered.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 03:11 PM
RE: Everybodies wrong.
(11-11-2016 02:47 PM)socialistview Wrote:  I'm saying if it was false its exclaiming that they were sacrificing children to baal and worshipping man made carved idols but its not.

What evidence do you have that it is true? The biblical stories don't count since they are what you are trying to prove.

(11-11-2016 02:49 PM)socialistview Wrote:  So there's evidence that it was destroyed and conquered.

Such as? Saying "there's evidence" is useless unless you provide it. Without that, it is just another empty claim.

There's evidence of destroyed cities in the region but not from the right time periods. There's no evidence to support the exodus or Joshua's reign of terror.

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes unfogged's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: