Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-12-2013, 12:37 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:28 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 10:51 AM)kingschosen Wrote:  Oh shut up.

That's not spam. Give it a rest.

The point of this thread is to discuss whether or not it is spam. I think it is because in each instance, his post contain no content relevant to the subject being discussed. The memes and such would be fine if they were included with content that actually was about the discussion.

Here we have a poster who goes around posting in threads with the sole purpose of promoting his idea that I am an idiot/etc.

That's off topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2013, 12:38 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:37 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 12:28 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  The point of this thread is to discuss whether or not it is spam. I think it is because in each instance, his post contain no content relevant to the subject being discussed. The memes and such would be fine if they were included with content that actually was about the discussion.

Here we have a poster who goes around posting in threads with the sole purpose of promoting his idea that I am an idiot/etc.

That's off topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

And I thought it was social commentary. Undecided

See here they are, the bruises, some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Anjele's post
19-12-2013, 12:40 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:28 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 10:51 AM)kingschosen Wrote:  Oh shut up.

That's not spam. Give it a rest.

The point of this thread is to discuss whether or not it is spam. I think it is because in each instance, his post contain no content relevant to the subject being discussed. The memes and such would be fine if they were included with content that actually was about the discussion.

Here we have a poster who goes around posting in threads with the sole purpose of promoting his idea that I am an idiot/etc.


Attached File(s)
.jpg  image.jpg (Size: 76.84 KB / Downloads: 29)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2013, 12:42 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:38 PM)Anjele Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 12:37 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  That's off topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

And I thought it was social commentary. Undecided

That too.

Great social commentary at that.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like kingschosen's post
19-12-2013, 12:43 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:37 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 12:28 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  The point of this thread is to discuss whether or not it is spam. I think it is because in each instance, his post contain no content relevant to the subject being discussed. The memes and such would be fine if they were included with content that actually was about the discussion.

Here we have a poster who goes around posting in threads with the sole purpose of promoting his idea that I am an idiot/etc.

That's off topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

I'd argue that it's not derailment so much as insulting them and moving on with ones day.

On the topic of derailment however:
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQhA84excPWmhltVQZiIBw...2CUbfSKm2b]

Spiderman thread!

The people closely associated with the namesake of female canines are suffering from a nondescript form of lunacy.
"Anti-environmentalism is like standing in front of a forest and going 'quick kill them they're coming right for us!'" - Jake Farr-Wharton, The Imaginary Friend Show.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Free Thought's post
19-12-2013, 12:48 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:34 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  EK deserves 40 lashes with a wet noodle.

Theists; seems they'll do most anything to get their kink on. Shy

I think in the end, I just feel like I'm a secular person who has a skeptical eye toward any extraordinary claim, carefully examining any extraordinary evidence before jumping to conclusions. ~ Eric ~ My friend ... who figured it out.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like kim's post
19-12-2013, 01:05 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 12:37 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

Rule 1 defines spam as follows: "Repetitious posts with similar content out of context is also considered spam".

EK's posting of the meme's are spam because they meet the above definition.

1)His posts are repetitious.
2)His posts are of similar content.
3)His posts are out of context.

How do you justify your claim that EK's post do not meet your definition of SPAM? Is my claim of 1, 2, or 3 not the case? If so how?

Vosur, Anjele, Hanoff.....have you learned nothing in my absence?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2013, 01:10 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
I swear I could hear the teacher from the Charlie Brown shows talking…


whah! whah! whah! whah! wut, whah!


"Life is a daring adventure or it is nothing"--Helen Keller
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Bows and Arrows's post
19-12-2013, 01:18 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
(19-12-2013 01:05 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(19-12-2013 12:37 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  topic posting and derailment. That's not spam.

Rule 1 defines spam as follows: "Repetitious posts with similar content out of context is also considered spam".

EK's posting of the meme's are spam because they meet the above definition.

1)His posts are repetitious.
2)His posts are of similar content.
3)His posts are out of context.

How do you justify your claim that EK's post do not meet your definition of SPAM? Is my claim of 1, 2, or 3 not the case? If so how?

Because it's not.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-12-2013, 01:20 PM
RE: Evolution Kills continually violates Rule 1
Heywood sounds more and more like I&I every day. Spiffy, just fucking spiffy.

See here they are, the bruises, some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Anjele's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: