Existential Pantheism
|
|
|
24-12-2012, 01:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Existential Pantheism
(24-12-2012 12:55 AM)Starcrash Wrote: Are you calling God "screwed up"?Imbarre is screwed up, Imbarre is God. QED. |
||||
![]() |
24-12-2012, 01:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Existential Pantheism
(24-12-2012 12:55 AM)Starcrash Wrote:(17-12-2012 01:52 PM)kingschosen Wrote: I mean... is using the quote function really that mind-blowing? |
||||
24-12-2012, 06:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Existential Pantheism
(24-12-2012 01:14 AM)lmbarre Wrote:(24-12-2012 12:55 AM)Starcrash Wrote: Well, if you don't believe in the quote function then it might be difficult to master. However, I've been convinced by Imbarre that existence itself -- including the forum's quote function -- is God, and therefore perfect. Are you calling God "screwed up"? 1. Reread that again. I spelled your name correctly. Why the correction? You're lending evidence to KC's assertion that you don't even do a basic proofread with that and the fact that you messed up the quote function -- AGAIN. 2. I'm just poking fun here at your idea of pantheism, and you're giving me plenty of fodder. The Egyptians were not pantheistic but rather polytheistic, but it wouldn't matter even if they were patheistic because it wouldn't make it true simply because an ancient culture believed it. And neter is the Egyptian word for "god", not netjer. But it didn't mean "God" as in "an all-encompassing being", but rather was a generic word for a god in the same way that "neteret" was their generic word for goddess. 3. It doesn't matter how many times you define "God". There's absolutely no reason for any of us to agree with you. You've made no attempt to prove that God is everything, but rather you just keep telling us it is. If I believed that this mug of coffee I'm holding was God, it would be very easy to prove to anyone nearby that "God exists", but they'd question why I wanted to define God as a mug of coffee. And I wonder why I would, too. It would be even harder to prove further assertions such as my mug of coffee being "good". When you further define God as "good", and not everything fits the definition of "good" (unless you want to define that into something meaningless, too), then there's plenty of counter-evidence against your idea of God being everything. My girlfriend is mad at me. Perhaps I shouldn't have tried cooking a stick in her non-stick pan. |
||||
![]() |
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)