Experimental verification

[houseofcantor]

For your consideration: it has been postulated that the intersection of this unworthy one and Gwyneth Paltrow would result in the termination of this one's function by exploding head. It has also been postulated that "Gwyneth Paltrow" is the archetype of "sweet and adorable." A sufficient and necessary consideration.

This being hypothesized, the nature of the experimentation is such that a less lethal proxy has been tested. To wit:



The young lady to the right is "sweet and adorable" (Julia). In the flesh, as it were. (The young lady to the left, Avery, completes the archetype of "The Sisters;" a whole 'nother story.)

This story begins with the arousal of I from the void of sleep, Saturday afternoon, in orbit around the alcoholic planetoid Annihilated. Just in time for lobsterfest. And from another's void, this Julia element is introduced into the environment."

"She has nothing to do with Gwyneth Paltrow," JJ declares.

"There ain't nothing about I that has nothing to do with Gwyneth," I reply. "Furthermore, as Julia is a hard copy representation of my Gwynnie's "sweet and adorable;" she is definitely an energetic attractor in the locality."

I told him I "run simulations," where Julia is "an overlay" in reality of the Gwynnite philosophy. Consider:



The energy of attraction found utility in the above manner. While everybody else was bored with a three hour return trip, I was sketching Julia from the void of my Gwynnies.

(If it ain't cool, I'm 'splainin' it wrong. )

[Erxomai]

This may be the most coherent you've ever been about Gwynniesism. However, I wish there was some way of washing my eyes from having seen your bony foot.

[DLJ]

Being a mere beginner in learning HoC my HoCese is uber-limited. But am I to take it that Johnny is in lurve?

[houseofcantor]

(12-08-2012 06:56 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Being a mere beginner in learning HoC my HoCese is uber-limited. But am I to take it that Johnny is in lurve?

With Gwyneth. Julia is currently involved, part of my extended family, and seventeen. The only "in" part of that love is inspiration. Julia is excellent portrait material.

[DLJ]

Ah, ok. Thanks for clarifying.

Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

[Erxomai]

(12-08-2012 09:29 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Ah, ok. Thanks for clarifying.

Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

That's not nearly as poetic.

[Chas]

(12-08-2012 09:29 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Ah, ok. Thanks for clarifying.

Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

There may be no direct translation into HoCese for that term.

[houseofcantor]

(12-08-2012 09:29 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Ah, ok. Thanks for clarifying.

Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

It was amusing.

[Bucky Ball]

(12-08-2012 09:29 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

Prophets need to make you think they are in touch with something you aren't, or they got's no job left. It's, forsooth, verbum dei, hocus pocus, dominocus, ya know.

[Erxomai]

(13-08-2012 12:00 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  

(12-08-2012 09:29 PM)DLJ Wrote:  Would it have been so hard just to write "I have found my muse"?

Prophets need to make you think they are in touch with something you aren't, or they got's no job left. It's, forsooth, verbum dei, hocus pocus, dominocus, ya know.