|
Explain Yourself
|
|
|
|
|
19-03-2010, 08:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 19-03-2010 09:14 AM by Stark Raving.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Explain Yourself
(19-03-2010 06:15 AM)jaronm90 Wrote:(17-03-2010 10:54 AM)Stark Raving Wrote: Signature: It just makes sense dammit! I have always wanted to know at what point the quote was altered, but Carl Sagan has used it both ways. At some point he used the reverse because it was also good logic. If I see no footprints in the newly fallen snow, it is evidence that noone has walked through the field today. The lack of evidence is what tells me that. It does not, however, tell me noone has walked through the field yesterday, since the newly fallen snow could simply be covering the footprints in the soil. To me, what matters is when you LOOK for the evidence. The scientist will move the snow, or wait for it to melt. Once you start to actively search, and still find no evidence, that is when absence is evidence. I apply this to god. I believe a thinking atheist searches for god, and that is why s/he knows there is not one. Lack of real evidence. In the end, even if the quote isn't what Sagan said, it's still applicable. Heck, I get stuff wrong all the time. I'm ok with it! LOL Ugh, read my post and realized I was unclear...... What I wrote is simply a way to argue both sides. Sorry, my thoughts tend to get away with me and I forget to mention important information. LOL What I didn't mention is that I am pretty sure that adding the "not" is the actual misquote, but since I haven't found the proof yet, I thought I would explain why it doesn't really matter. Truth be told, my quote is in fact more accurate than saying absence is not evidence, but thats just how I see it. I'll do some research though, and come back to it........I know I've seen this argument somewhere before. |
||||
|
19-03-2010, 10:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
Not proof that it is a misquote either way, but an interesting read. It also raises the point about WHO said it. Looks like we may have both been wrong about that one.
http://logbase2.blogspot.com/2009/01/abs...dence.html |
||||
|
19-03-2010, 11:27 AM
|
||
|
||
RE: Explain Yourself
(19-03-2010 08:34 AM)Stark Raving Wrote:(19-03-2010 06:15 AM)jaronm90 Wrote:(17-03-2010 10:54 AM)Stark Raving Wrote: I'm pretty sure it's in Pale Blue Dot that Sagan says this quote and uses it in an statement concluding (essentially): since we haven't found any evidence of aliens yet that doesn't mean they don't exist. I did a quick Google search and found a couple quote indexes. Link Link 2 But I also came across this page which might support the context you were trying to explain in the form of a logic proof. Link 3 This is more analytical than the context Carl was using the quote for when I first heard it. I agree that without proof of something one can logically and correctly state that they have not found evidence for that which they were looking for and deduce that it doesn't exist, but, that is working under the assumption that anywhere one can look for evidence, one has, and still found no proof, making it logical to conclude it doesn't exist. Sagan was stating that: though we have looked and still found no evidence, we have not looked everywhere and it would be too soon to deduce nonexistence (in reference to extraterrestrial intelligence). Here's another link with the quote in it along with his reason for saying it and how it applies to his theological perspective. Link 4 I'm almost 100% sure the lack of "not" in the quote would imply the opposite of how Carl viewed the world, with a fair balance of open-mindedness and skepticism. If you can find a link to prove otherwise, i.e. that Carl said it without the "not", I would quickly rescind my position. I think it's clear we were operating under different conditions for our understanding of the quote. Before I posted this I found one more link which puts this quote in Sagan's Demon Haunted World as well, I wasn't 100% on if I was correctly remembering this being in here until this refreshed my memory. Link 5 (19-03-2010 10:53 AM)Stark Raving Wrote: Not proof that it is a misquote either way, but an interesting read. It also raises the point about WHO said it. Looks like we may have both been wrong about that one. Saw this after I posted the other. Hahahaha... Rumsfeld. That guy is a blabbering moron in my opinion. But I was never putting forward that I believed Sagan was the first to coin the quote, only that he's where I first heard it from (while reading Pale Blue Dot) and that there was a "not" in it. |
||
|
19-03-2010, 11:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
I am sure we can agree that the interesting part of the discussion is not where the quote origionated, but whether one or the other holds more water. Thanks for sparking the discussion! I am going to start a thread about it, just so we don't completely hijack this one! lol.
Hope to continue this... |
||||
|
19-03-2010, 02:25 PM
|
||
|
||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
USERNAME: I love platypuses. Or is it platypii? No idea, but they're damned cool animals. Also: poison claw of DEATH!
AVATAR: Just a cool picture of a platypus I found once. TITLE: From the kid's show "Phineas and Ferb", their mild-mannered pet platypus is, by night, a brave secret agent called Agent P. His theme song features the line: "He's a semi-aquatic egg-laying mammal of action." QUOTE: I say this all the time, because it's true. There are secularists, humanists, freethinkers and such running around southern Louisiana, but they are few and far between. |
||
|
31-03-2010, 02:45 PM
|
||
|
||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
USERNAME: I always wanted that username and this is the first time it wasn't already taken. When I heard of the aquamarine gemstone I liked the way it sounds and since my real name is Marina, I immediately adopted it
![]() AVATAR: I'm an anime addict and this girl kinda goes with the username because of her haircolor xD TITLE: that's how I see myself (PS ran out of ideas) SIGNATURE: I love the rain...that's all I have to say |
||
|
03-04-2010, 10:19 AM
|
||
|
||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
avatar - Polaroid picture I took.
username - Favorite Harlan Ellison book (title). custom title - One of my favorite label "warnings". signature - One of my favorite authors. |
||
|
22-04-2010, 06:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
Profile change, so here we go again.
My new avatar is Gamal from the webcomic "Men In Hats", which is about six men in an unnamed desert who talk and occasionally eat sandwiches. Gamal is the only sort-of normal man there, and serves as the voice of reason in the series. I considered making Amar, the sadistic and hilarious dude in the top hat, my avatar, but I couldn't find an expression that was as funny as Gamal's. My title is a (fairly obvious) reference to a line from "Sympathy For the Devil" by the Rolling Stones. The opening verse goes like this, in case you haven't heard it: Please allow me to introduce myself I'm a man of wealth and taste I've been around for a long, long year Stole many a man's soul and faith I was 'round when Jesus Christ Had his moment of doubt and pain Mad damn sure that Pilate Washed his hands and sealed his fate Pleased to meet you Hope you guess my name But what's puzzling you is The nature of my game Of course, it's being sung by the devil, so... yeah. Figured it was appropriate. And my new signature is from The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents, which is one of my favorite Terry Pratchett books. ----------SPOILER! If you want to read the book without knowing how it ends, stop here------------ A talking cat (Maurice) and some talking rats (the educated rodents) move into a small town looking for their fortunes, but discover that the town is in danger from a mysterious being named "Spider". Spider, as it turns out, is a Rat King - a group of rats whose tails were tied together by rat catchers for fun - consisting of eight individual rats. Eventually, Dangerous Beans, the most intelligent of the rats, confronts Spider in the sewers underneath the city. The full scene goes like this: Quote:'I want to see who I am talking to,' said Dangerous Beans, firmly. I had to cut a bit out of the speech, of course - stupid character limits - but I still think it's very powerful writing. "Sometimes it is better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness." - Terry Pratchett |
||||
|
18-08-2010, 08:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: Explain Yourself
Bump for the newbies. EXPLAIN YOURSELVES!
Oh, my current avatar is H. P. Lovecraft, my title shows my love of games of all types, and my signature is another Terry Pratchett quote. "Sometimes it is better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness." - Terry Pratchett |
||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Hi, I'll explain my story. | bigcatlover2000 | 21 | 959 |
15-12-2011 03:49 PM Last Post: bigcatlover2000 |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)






![[+]](images/night/collapse_collapsed.gif)


