Forum Rules Need Tweaking
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
12-09-2013, 08:05 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
I read the thread that was locked. KC made it abundantly clear that it was a temporary lock for now, while we discussed it.

The fact is, pedophilia is an out of bounds topic on this forum. I don't like it, and neither do most others, but it's a fact. Sometimes you just gotta live within the rules.

So many cats, so few good recipes.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-09-2013, 08:19 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
At first, I thought the title said that the forum rules need twerking.

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Tartarus Sauce's post
12-09-2013, 08:49 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
(12-09-2013 08:19 AM)Tartarus Sauce Wrote:  At first, I thought the title said that the forum rules need twerking.

They just might, at that. Consider

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
12-09-2013, 09:19 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
You do NOT want to see me twerk.

So many cats, so few good recipes.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Stark Raving's post
12-09-2013, 10:45 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
(12-09-2013 09:19 AM)Stark Raving Wrote:  You do NOT want to see me twerk.

Au contraire, mon ami! Evil_monster

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-09-2013, 10:47 AM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
(12-09-2013 09:19 AM)Stark Raving Wrote:  You do NOT want to see me twerk.


Pics or it didn't happen. Tongue

I'm not anti-social. I'm pro-solitude. Sleepy
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-09-2013, 07:21 PM
RE: Forum Rules Need Tweaking
(06-09-2013 05:05 AM)DLJ Wrote:  Ooooh!

The stars are explained. I missed the memo.

Thanks DL, for the link.

Something struck me as odd, though (and I read though 10 pages to find that it wasn't covered):
Some contributors have an 'eighth star' but haven't made the target number of posts to get their sixth or seventh yet.

For example, as a contributing member but with a post count of < 10,000, my stars should now be:
* * * * * * _ *

or there is something wrong with the wording of the announcement i.e. change 'eighth' to 'eight'.

No need to thank me. Any time. Smartass

Contributors automatically get 8 (I think) stars as opposed to the corresponding amount for their post count. Reason is that it would simply be too complex to have them have red stars that automatically increase.

Best and worst of Ferdinand .....
Best
Ferdinand: We don't really say 'theist' in Alabama. Here, you're either a Christian, or you're from Afghanistan and we fucking hate you.
Worst
Ferdinand: Everyone from British is so, like, fucking retarded.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: